Completeness of data entry in three cancer surgery database

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 850-856

  Warsi, A A ^a   White, S ^a   McCulloch, P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AINTREE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CALCULATION; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; GASTROESOPHAGEAL CANCER; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; TIME; TRAINING;

EID: 0036892494     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1283     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Black N. Developing high quality clinical database. BMJ 1997; 315: 38-2.
2. Little JM. Clinical databases and surgical research. Aust NJZ Surg 1992; 62: 327-32.
3. George AM, Maddocks GB. Accuracy of diagnostic content of hospital activity analysis in infectious diseases. BMJ 1979; 1: 1332-4.
4. Marubini E, Mariani L, Salvadori B et al. Results of a breast-cancer-surgery trial compared with observational data from routine practice. Lancet 1996; 347: 1000-3.
5. Weinshenker BG. Databases in MS research: pitfalls and promises. Mult Scler 1999; 5: 206-11.
6. Hunter JG, Lyon C, Galloway K, Putterill M, van Rij A. Complete clinical outcomes audit. Resource requirements and validation of the instrument. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 699-704.
7. Corley DA, Cello JP, Koch J. Accuracy of endoscopic databases for assessing patient symptoms: comparison with self-reported questionnaires in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 129-33.
8. Dornan S, Murray FE, White G et al. An audit of the accuracy of upper gastrointestinal diagnoses in Scottish Morbidity Record I data in Tayside. Health Bull (Edinb) 1995; 53: 274-9.
9. Shroyer AL, Edwards FH, Grover FL. Updates to the Data Quality Review Program: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac National Database. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 1494-7.
10. Evans WK, Crook J, Read D, Morriss J, Logan DM. Capturing tumour stage in a cancer information database. Cancer Prev Control 1998; 2: 304-9.
11. Lyons C, Gumpert R. Medical audit data: counting is not enough. BMJ 1990; 300: 1563-6.
12. MacIntyre CR, Ackland MJ, Chandraraj EJ, Pilla JE. Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes in hospital morbidity data, Victoria: implications for public health research. Aust NZJ Public Health 1997; 21: 477-82.
13. Murdoch JB, Weeks JF, Howe K, Smith J, Kirkpatrick A, McCrum A. The surgical management of cervical carcinoma within the South West of England: progress through an audit loop. Gynaecology Tumour Panel. BJOG 2000; 107: 308-15.
14. Lennox B, Clarke JA, Drake F, Ewen SWB. Incidence of salivary gland tumours in Scotland: accuracy of national records. BMJ 1978; 1: 687-9.
15. Wei YL, Detre KM, Everhart JE. The NIDDK liver transplantation database. Liver Transpl Surg 1997; 3: 10-22.
16. Volk T, Hahn L, Hayden R, Abel J, Puterman ML, Tyers GF. Reliability audit of a regional cardiac surgery registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 903-10.
17. Barrie JL, Marsh DR. Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database. BMJ 1992; 304: 159-62.
18. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a postal survey regarding 30, 376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70: 467-72.
19. Owen JL, Bolenbaucher RM, Moore ML. Trauma registry databases: a comparison of data abstraction, interpretation, and entry at two level I trauma centers. J Trauma 1999; 46: 1100-4.