ENT challenges at the small scale

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 91-96

  Coulson, C J ^a,c   Reid, A P ^a   Proops, D W ^a   Brett, P N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Robotics; Sinus surgery

Indexed keywords

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; KNEE PROSTHESES; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ACROBOTS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; HUMAN PERCEPTION; REPLACEMENT SYSTEMS; ROBOTIC SOLUTIONS; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS APPLICATIONS; SINUS SURGERY; SMALL SCALE;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EAR NOSE THROAT SURGERY; EAR SURGERY; ELECTRODE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MASTOIDECTOMY; MYRINGOTOMY; REVIEW; RHINOSINUSITIS; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 34547567034     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.132     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Young N, Nguyen T, Wiet R. Cochlear implantation. Operat Techn Otolaryngol 2003; 14(4): 263-267.
2. Doden E, Halves R. On the functional morphology of the human petrous bone. Am J Anat 1984; 169: 451-462.
3. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W et al. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 348-352.
4. Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, et al. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27(8): 1083-1088.
5. Skar y ski H, Lorens A, D'Haese P, et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002; 64(4): 247-253.
6. th International Congress. (London) p561-567.
7. Eljamel MS. Comparison of a neurosurgical robot and a stereotatic frame in a neurosurgical phantom. Presented at American Society for Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Presented at: Meeting of the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, June 1-4 2006; Boston, USA.
8. Schipper J, Aschendorff A, Arapakis I, et al. Navigation as a quality management tool in cochlear implant surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2004; 118(10): 764-770.
9. Brett PN, Baker DA, Reyes L, Blanshard J. An automatic technique for micro-drilling a stapedotomy in the stapes exible footplate. Proc IMechE H 1995; 255-262.
10. Brett PN, Baker DA, Taylor R, Griffiths MV. Controlling the penetration of flexible bone tissue using the stapedotomy microdrill. J Syst Control Eng 2004; 218: 343-351.
11. Hirshowitz BI, Curtiss LE, Peters CW, Pollard HM. Demonstration of a new gastroscope, the fiberscope. Gastroenterology 1958; 35(1): 50.
12. Neumann AM, Pasquale-Niebles K, Bhuta T, Sillers MJ. Image-guided transnasal endoscopic surgery of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base. Am J Rhinol 1999; 13(6): 449-454.
13. Knott PD, Batra PS, Butler RS, Citardi MJ. Contour and paired-point registration in a model for image-guided surgery. Laryngoscope 2006; 116(10): 1877-1881.
14. Jakopec M, Harris SJ, y Baena FR, et al. The first clinical application of a 'hands-on' robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6(6): 329-339.