Mirror, mirror on the wall: Culture's consequences in a value test of its own design

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 885-904

  Ailon, Galit ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547554235     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.34421995     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Ahrens, T. 1996. Styles oi accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21: 139-173.
2. Ailon, G. 2007. Global ambitions and local identities: An Israeli-American high-tech merger. New York: Berghahn Books.
3. Ailon-Souday, G., & Kunda, G. 2003. The local selves of global workers: The social construction of national identity in the face of organizational globalization. Organization Studies, 24: 1073-1096.
4. Baskerville, R. F. 2003. Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28: 1-14.
5. Bhagat, R. S. 2002. Book review of Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (second edition). Academy of Management Review, 27: 460-462.
6. Bing, J. W. 2004. Hofstede's consequences: The impact of his work on consulting and business practices. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 80-87.
7. Brannen, M. Y. 2004. When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29: 593-616.
8. Brown, R. H. 1990. Rhetoric, textuality, and the postmodern turn in sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 8: 188-197.
9. Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9: 221-235.
10. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. 1979. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
11. Calás, M. B. 1992. An/other silent voice? Representing "Hispanic woman" in organizational texts. In A. J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis: 201-221. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Calás, M. B. 1993. Deconstructing charismatic leadership: Re-reading Weber from the darker side. Leadership Quarterly, 4: 305-328.
13. Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. 1991. Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organization Studies, 12: 567-601.
14. Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. 1992. Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organizations: New directions in organizational theory and analysis: 227-253. London: Sage.
15. Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. 1993. Dangerous liaisons: The "feminine-in-management" meets "globalization." Business Horizons, 36(2): 71-81.
16. Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. 1999. Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24: 649-671.
17. Chandy, P. R., & Williams, T. G. E. 1994. The impact of journals and authors on international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 715-728.
18. Clegg, S. R., & Hardy, C. 1999. Introduction. In S. R. Clegg & C. Hardy (Eds.), Studying organization: Theory & method: 1-22. London: Sage.
19. Cooper, R. 1989. Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization Studies, 10: 479-502.
20. Cooper, R., Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 9:91-112.
21. Derrida, J. 1972. Positions. (Translated and annotated by A. Bass.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Eckhardt, G. 2002. Book review of Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (second edition). Australian Journal of Management, 27: 89-94.
23. Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Ferguson, K. E. 1994. On bringing more theory, more voices and more politics to the study of organizations. Organi zation, 1: 81-99.
25. Foucault, M. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. (Translated by A. M. S. Smith.) New York: Pantheon.
26. Foucault, M. 1977. Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. (Edited by D. F. Bouchard.) Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. (Edited by C. Gordon.) New York: Pantheon.
28. Frost, P. 1980. Toward a radical framework for practicing organization science. Academy of Management Review, 5: 501-507.
29. Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. 1990. Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 5: 584-602.
30. Harrison, G. L, & McKinnon, J. L. 1999. Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: A review of the current state. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 24: 483-506.
31. Hart, W. B. 1999. Interdisciplinary influences in the study of intercultural relations: A citation analysis of the International Journal of Inteicultuial Relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23: 575-589.
32. Hofstede, G. 1978. The poverty of management control philosophy. Academy of Management Review, 3: 450-461.
33. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in wori-relafed values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. Hofstede, G. 1983. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2): 75-89.
35. Hofstede, G. 1990. A reply and comment on Joginder P. Singh: "Managerial culture and work-related values in India." Organization Studies, 11: 103-106.
36. Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
37. Hofstede, G. 1994. Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40: 4-13.
38. Hofstede, G. 1996. An American in Paris: The influence of nationality on organization theories. Organization Studies, 17: 525-537.
39. Hofstede, G. (Ed.). 1998a. Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Hofstede, G. 1998b. Masculinity/femininity as a dimension of culture. In G. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 3-28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Hofstede, G. 1998c. The cultural construction of gender. In G. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 77-105. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Hofstede, G. 1998d. Comparative studies of sexual behavior: Sex as achievement or as relationship? In G. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 153-178. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Hofstede, G. 1998e. Religion, masculinity, and sex. In G. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 192-209. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. 1988. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4): 4-21.
46. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. 2005. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (revised & expanded 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. 2004. Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38: 52-88.
48. Hoppe, M. H. 2004. An interview with Geert Hofstede. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 75-79.
49. Jack, G., & Lorbiecki, A. 2003. Asserting possibilities of resistance in the cross-cultural teaching machine: Reviewing videos of others. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement: 213-232. New York: Palgrave.
50. Jack, G., & Westwood, R. 2006. Postcolonialism and the politics of qualitative research in international business. Management International Review, 46: 481-501.
51. Joseph, G. G., Reddy, V., & Searle-Chatterjee, M. 1990. Ethnocentrism in the social sciences. Race & Class, 31(4): 1-26.
52. Kirkman, B. L., & Law, K. S. K. 2005. From the editors: International management research in AMJ: Our past, present, and future. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 377-386.
53. Kirkman, B. L., Lowe., K. B., Gibson, C. B. 2006. A quarter century of Culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 285-320.
54. Kitayama, S. 2002. Culture and basic psychological processes - Toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128: 89-96.
55. Knights, D., & Morgan, G. 1991. Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12: 251-273.
56. Kuhn, T. 1972. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108: 480-498.
58. Kwek, D. 2003. Decolonizing and re-presenting Culture's consequences: A postcolonial critique of cross-cultural studies in management. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement: 121-146. New York: Palgrave.
59. Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60. Manning, P. K., & Cullum-Swan, B. 1994. Narrative, content, and semiotic analysis. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: 463-477. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. 2004. Qualitative research methods in international business: The state of the art. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business: 5-24. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
62. Martin, J. 1994. The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research. Organization, 1: 401-431.
63. McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55: 89-118.
64. Merker, S. L. 1982. Book review of Geert Hofstede's Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Behavioral Science, 27: 195-197.
65. Meyerson, D. E. 1998. Feeling stressed and burned out: A feminist reading and re-visioning of stress-based emotions within medicine and organization science. Organization Science, 9: 103-118.
66. Morgan, G. 1983. The significance of assumptions. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research: 377-382. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
67. Mumby, D. K., & Putnam, L. L. 1992. The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality. Academy of Management Review, 17: 465-486.
68. Nkomo, S. M. 1992. The emperor has no clothes: Rewriting "Race in organizations." Academy of Management Review, 17: 487-513.
69. Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. 2002. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128: 3-72.
70. Parker, M. 1992. Post-modern organizations or postmodern organization theory. Organization Studies, 13: 1-17.
71. Prasad, A. (Ed.). 2003. Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement. New York: Palgrave
72. Reed, M. 1992. Introduction. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking organizations: New directions in organizational theory and analysis: 1-16. London: Sage.
73. Richardson, L. 1994. Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: 516-529. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Robinson, R. V. 1983. Book review of Culture's consequences: International differences in wort-related values. Work and Occupations, 10: 110-115.
75. Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Random House.
76. Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. 2005. Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9: 17-31.
77. Schcoler, C. 1983. Book review of Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Contemporary Sociology, 12: 167.
78. Singh, J. P. 1990. Managerial culture and work-related values in India. Organization Studies, 11: 75-101.
79. Søndergaard, M. 1994. Research note: Hofstede's consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications. Organization Studies, 15: 447-456.
80. Sorge, A. 1983. Book review of Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 625-629.
81. Spivak, G. C. 1988. Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography. In R. Guha & G. C. Spivak (Eds.), Selected subaltern studies: 3-34. New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Triandis, H. C. 1993. Reviews on cultural phenomena - Cultures and organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 132-134.
83. Triandis, H. C. 2004. The many dimensions of culture. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 88-93.
84. Van Deusen, C. 2002. Book review of Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Business & Society, 41: 125-128.
85. Vunderink, M. & Hofstede, G. 1998. Femininity shock: American students in the Netherlands. In G. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures: 139-152. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86. Weaver, G. R., & Gioia, D. A. 1994. Paradigms lost: Incommensurability vs structurationist inquiry. Organization Studies, 15: 565-590.
87. Westwood, R. 2004. Towards a postcolonial research paradigm in international business and comparative management. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business: 56-83. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
88. Williamson, D. 2002. Forward from a critique of Hofstede's model of national culture. Human Relations, 55: 1373-1395.