How corporate social performance is institutionalised within the governance structure: The Dutch corporate governance model

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 177-189

  De Graaf, Frank J ^a,b,c   Herkströter, Cor A J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Business School   (Netherlands)

^c Wellbeing and Sports   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Corporate governance; Corporate social performance; Stakeholder influence

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547553813     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9229-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ackerman, R. W.: 1973, 'How Companies Respond to Social Demands', Harvard Business Review 51(4), 88-98.
2. Bauer, R. A. and R. W. Ackerman: 1976, Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemma (Reston Publishing Company, Reston)..
3. Berman, S. and T. Rowley: 2000, 'A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance', Business and Society 39(4), 397-418.
4. Bovens, M. A. P.: 1998, The Quest for Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
5. Caldwell, C and R. Karri: 2005, 'Organizational Governance and Ethical Systems: A Convenante Approach of Building Trust', Journal of Business Ethics 58, 249-259.
6. Carrol, A. B.: 1979, 'A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Review 4, 497-505.
7. Coffey, B. S. and J. Wang: 1998, 'Board Diversity and Managerial Control as Predictors of Corporate Social Performance', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1593-1603.
8. Daboub, A. J. and J. M. Calton: 2002, 'Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks', Journal of Business Ethics 41, 81-98.
9. Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman and F. David: 1997, 'Toward a Stewardship Theory of the Firm', Academy of Management Review 22(1), 20-47.
10. Freeman, R. E. and D. Reed: 1993, 'Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance', California Management Review 25(3), 88-106.
11. Frooman, J.: 1999, 'Stakeholder Influence Strategies', Academy of Management Review 24(2), 191-205.
12. Gargiulo, M.: 1993, 'Two-Step Leverage: Managing Constraint in Organizational Polities', Administrative Science Quarterly 38(1), 1-19.
13. Grandori, A.: 1997, 'Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models', Journal of Management and Governance 1, 29-47.
14. Griffin, J. J.: 2000, 'Corporate Social Performance, Research Directions for the 21st Century', Business and Society 39(4), 479-491.
15. Heath, J. and W. Norman: 2004, 'Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach Us in. the Post-Enron era?', Journal of Business Ethics 53, 247-265.
16. Hillman, A. J., G. D. Keim, and R. A. Luce: 2001, 'Board Composition and Stakeholder Performance: Do Stakeholder Directors Make a Difference?', Business and Society 40(3), 295-315.
17. Kochan, T. A. and S. A. Rubinstein: 2000, 'Toward a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: The Saturn Partnership', Organization Science 11(4), 367-386.
18. Leader, S.: 1999, 'Participation and Property Rights', Journal of Business Ethics 21, 97-109.
19. Luoma, P. and J. Goodstein: 1999, 'Stakeholders and Corporate Boards: Institutional Influences on Board Composition and Structure', Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 553-564.
20. Margolis, J. D. and J. P. Walsh: 2003, 'Misery Loves Companies', Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 268-305.
21. Moerland, P. W.: 1995, 'Alternative Disciplinary Mechanisms in. Different Corporate Systems', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 26, 17-34.
22. Nooteboom, B.: 1999, 'Voice- and Exit-Based Forms of Corporate Control: Anglo-American, European, and Japanese', Journal of Economic Issues XXXIII(4), 845-860.
23. Sociaal-Economische Raad: 2000, De Winst van waarden, Den Haag.
24. Swanson, D. L.: 1995, 'Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 43-64.
25. Swanson, D. L.: 1999, 'Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Review 24(3), 506-521.
26. Wartick, S. L. and P. L. Cochran: 1985, 'The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model', Academy of Management Review 10(4), 758-769.
27. Weimer, J. and J. Pape: 1999, 'Corporate Governance', A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance 7(2), 152-166.
28. Whitley, R.: 1999, Divergent Capitalisms, The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
29. Williamson, O. E.: 2000, 'The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead', Journal of Economic Literature 38(3), 595-613.
30. Wood, D. J.: 1991, 'Corporate Social Performance Revisited', Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691-718.
31. Zadek, S.: 1998, 'Balancing Performance, Ethics, and Accountability', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1421-1441.