Environmental policy integration through OECD peer reviews: Integrating the economy with the environment or the environment with the economy?

Environmental Politics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 15-35

  Lehtonen, Markku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; OECD; POLICY MAKING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 34547530042     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644010601073432     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1996) Organizational Learning II. Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
2. Beyeler, M. (2002) OECD surveillance and welfare states in Western Europe - concepts and methods of a comparative research project. paper presented at COST A15 Second Conference Welfare Reforms for the 21st Century Oslo
3. Borras, S. and Jacobsson, K. (2004) The open method of coordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2, pp. 185-208.
4. Council of the EU (2000) Note on the ongoing experience of the Open Method of Coordination.
5. de la Rosa, S. (2005) The Open Method of Coordination in the new member states - the perspectives for its use as a tool of soft law. European Law Journal, 11:5, pp. 618-640.
6. Dostal, J. M. (2004) Campaigning on expertise: How the OECD framed EU welfare and labour market policies - and why success could trigger failure. Journal of European Public Policy, 11:3, pp. 440-460.
7. EEA (2005) Environmental Policy Integration in Europe: State of Play and an Evaluation Framework, EEA Technical Report No. 2, EEA, Copenhagen
8. Feinstein, O. N. (2002) Use of evaluations and evaluation of their use. Evaluation, 8:4, pp. 433-439.
9. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52:4, pp. 887-917.
10. Forss, K., Reubien, C. C. and Carlsson, J. (2002) Process use of evaluations: Types of use that precede lessons learned and feedback. Evaluation, 8:1, pp. 29-45.
11. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1994) The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics, 10:3, pp. 197-207.
12. Goldsmith, E., Allen, R., Allaby, M., Davoll, J. and Lawrence, S. (1972) A Blueprint for Survival, Penguin Books, London
13. Grant, D., Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C. (2001) Organisational discourse: key contributions and challenges. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 31:3, pp. 5-24.
14. Heclo, H. (1974) Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance, Yale University Press, New Haven
15. Henry, G. T. and Mark, M. M. (2003) Beyond use: Understanding evaluation's influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation, 24:3, pp. 293-314.
16. Hertin, J. and Berkhout, F. (2003) Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration: The case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5:1, pp. 39-56.
17. Hodgson, G. M. (1988) Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Polity Press and Blackwell, Cambridge and Oxford
18. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) (1980) World Conservation Strategy: Living Resources Conservation for Sustainable Development, International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland
19. Julnes, G., Mark, M. and Henry, G. T. (1998) Promoting realism in evaluation: Realistic evaluation and the broader context. Evaluation, 4:4, pp. 483-504.
20. Lafferty, W. M. and Hovden, E. (2003) Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12:3, pp. 1-22.
21. Lehtonen, M. (2005) OECD environmental performance programme: accountability (f)or learning?. Evaluation, 11:2, pp. 169-188.
22. Lehtonen, M. (2005) Environmental policy evaluation in the service of sustainable development: Influence of the OECD Environmental Performance Reviews from the perspective of institutional economics. Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, U.F.R. des Sciences Sociales et des Humanités, France
23. Lehtonen, M. (2006) Deliberative democracy, participation, and OECD peer reviews of environmental policies'. American Journal of Evaluation, 27:2, pp. 185-200.
24. Leknes, E. (2001) The roles of EIA in the decision-making process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21:4, pp. 309-334.
25. Lenschow, A. (2002) New regulatory approaches in 'greening' EU policies. European Law Journal, 8:1, pp. 19-37.
26. Liberatore, A. (1997) The integration of sustainable development objectives into EU policy-making: Barriers and prospects. The Politics of Sustainable Development, pp. 107-126. Routledge, London
27. March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1998) The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52:4, pp. 943-969.
28. Marcussen, M. (2003) Multilateral surveillance and the OECD: Playing the idea game. The OECD and European Welfare States
29. Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G. and O'Neill, J. (1998) Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26:3, pp. 277-286.
30. Mickwitz, P. and Kivimaa, P. (2004) Evaluating Policy Integration - the case of policies for environmentally friendlier technological innovations.
31. Nilsson, M. A. (2005) Connecting Reason to Power: Assessments, Learning, and Environmental Policy Integration in Swedish Energy Policy, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm
32. Nilsson, M. A. (2005) Learning, frames and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23:2, pp. 207-226.
33. Nollkaemper, A. (2002) Three conceptions of the integration principle in international environmental law. Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe, pp. 22-32. Earthscan, London
34. OECD (1996) Integrating Environment and Economy: Progress in the 1990s, OECD, Paris
35. OECD (1997) Guiding the Transition to Sustainable Development: A Critical Role for the OECD, OECD High-Level Advisory Group on the Environment, OECD, Paris
36. OECD (1997) Workshop on the second cycle of reviews/lessons from the first cycle of reviews. document prepared by the Finnish Delegation, OECD Environment Directorate/Enviornmental Policy Committee
37. OECD (1998) OECD environmental performance reviews: Second cycle work plan.
38. OECD (2001) Policies to Enhance Sustainable Development, OECD, Paris
39. OECD (2001) OECD Environmental Strategy for the First Decade of the 21st Century, OECD, Paris
40. OECD (2001) Sustainable Development: Critical Issues, OECD, Paris
41. OECD (2002) Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth, OECD, Paris
42. OECD (2002) Improving Policy Coherence and Integration for SD: A Checklist, OECD, Paris
43. OECD (2003) Peer Review: An OECD Tool for Co-operation and Change, OECD, Paris
44. OECD (2003) Future direction of the OECD: Report on OECD's role in global architecture. report prepared by Ambassador Jorma Julin
45. OECD (2003) OECD Environmental Indicators: Development, Measurement and Use, Reference Paper, OECD, Paris
46. OECD (2004) Measuring Sustainable Development: Integrated Economic, Environmental and Social Frameworks, OECD, Paris
47. OECD (2004) Meeting of the Environmental Policy Committee at Ministerial Level. Agenda, OECD, Paris
48. OECD (2004) Draft final report to ministers: Ad hoc group on sustainable development.
49. OECD (2004) Programme of work and budget 2005-06: Secretary-General's submission.
50. O'Neill, J. (1997) Managing without prices: The monetary valuation of biodiversity. Ambio, 26:8, pp. 546-550.
51. Owens, S. and Rayner, T. (1999) "When knowledge matters": The role and influence of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 1:1, pp. 7-24.
52. Patton, M. Q. (1998) Discovering process use. Evaluation, 4:2, pp. 225-233.
53. Persson, Å. and Nilsson, M. (2003) Framework for analysing environmental policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5:4, pp. 333-359.
54. Pollit, C. (1998) Evaluation in Europe: Boom or bubble?. Evaluation, 4:2, pp. 214-224.
55. Radaelli, C. (2000) Discourse and institutional change: The case of Italy in the euro-zone.
56. Room, G. (2005) Policy benchmarking in the European Union: Indicators and ambiguities. Policy Studies, 26:2, pp. 117-132.
57. Sabatier, P. (1987) Knowledge, policy-oriented learning and policy change: An advocacy coalition framework. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation, 8:4, pp. 649-692.
58. Schout, A. and Jordan, A. (2005) Coordinated European governance: self-organising or centrally steered?. Public Administration, 83:1, pp. 201-220.
59. Sharman, J. C. (2005) OECD reputation as OECD effectiveness. paper presented at the International Studies Association Meeting Honolulu, Hawaii
60. Strang, D. and Chang, P. M. Y. (1993) The International Labour Organisation and the welfare state: Institutional effects on national welfare spending, 1960-80. International Organization, 47:2, pp. 235-262.
61. United Nations (1994) Agenda 21: Programme of Action from Rio, United Nations Department of Public Information, New York
62. Upton, S. (2002) Retour à l'essentiel. L'Observateur OCDE, pp. 8-10.
63. Valovirta, V. (2002) Evaluation utilization as argumentation. Evaluation, 8:1, pp. 60-80.
64. Van der Meer, F. B. (1999) Evaluation and the social construction of impacts. Evaluation, 5:4, pp. 387-406.
65. Vedung, E. (1991) Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning, Studentlitteratur, Lund
66. WCED (World Commission on the Environment and Development) (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford
67. Weiss, C. H. (1987) The circuitry of enlightenment: Diffusion of social science research to policymakers. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation, 8:2, pp. 274-281.
68. Weiss, C. H. (1999) The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation, 5:4, pp. 468-486.
69. Wildavsky, A. B. (1987) Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ
70. Wilkinson, D., Skinner, I. and Ferguson, M. (2002) The Future of the Cardiff Process, a report for the Danish Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Project no. 748, Institute for Environmental Policy and Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen