Tracing the ancient origins of plant innate immunity

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 334-342

  Staal, Jens ^a,b   Dixelius, Christina ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 1 RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; INNATE IMMUNITY; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; IMMUNITY, NATURAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; RECEPTORS, INTERLEUKIN-1;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 34547520329     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.014     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Golstein P., et al. Cell-death alternative model organisms: why and which?. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4 (2003) 798-807
2. Cornillon S., et al. Programmed cell death in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Sci. 107 (1994) 2691-2704
3. Zipfel C., and Felix G. Plants and animals: a different taste for microbes?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8 (2005) 353-360
4. Mackey D., and McFall A. MAMPs and MIMPs: proposed classifications for inducers of innate immunity. Mol. Microbiol. 61 (2006) 1365-1371
5. Bianchi M.E. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. J. Leukoc. Biol. 81 (2007) 1-5
6. Ausubel F.M. Are innate immune signalling pathways in plants and animals conserved? Nat. Immunol. 10 (2005) 973-979
7. Rolff J. Why did the acquired immune system of vertebrates evolve?. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 31 (2007) 476-482
8. van der Biezen E.A., and Jones J. Plant disease resistance proteins and the gene-for-gene concept. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23 (1998) 454-456
9. Jones J.D., and Dangl J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 444 (2006) 323-329
10. McDonald B.A., and Linde C. Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40 (2002) 349-379
11. Kover P.X., and Cacedo L. The genetic architecture of disease resistance in plants and the maintenance of recombination by parasites. Mol. Ecol. 10 (2001) 1-16
12. Koonin E.V., and Aravind L. Origin and evolution of eukaryotic apoptosis: the bacterial connection. Cell Death Differ. 9 (2002) 394-404
13. Magor B.G., and Magor K. Evolution of effectors and receptors of innate immunity. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 25 (2001) 651-682
14. Dacks J.B., and Doolittle W. Reconstructing/deconstructing the earliest eukaryotes: how comparative genomics can help. Cell 107 (2001) 419-425
15. Blair J.E., et al. Evolutionary sequence analysis of complete eukaryote genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 6 (2005) 53
16. Ciccarelli F.D., et al. Toward automatic reconstruction of highly resolved tree of life. Science 311 (2006) 1283-1287
17. Hunter P. Common defences - comparisons between plant and animal immunity can benefit both research communities. EMBO J. 6 (2005) 504-507
18. Tuskan G.A., et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313 (2006) 1596-1604
19. Meyers B.C., et al. TIR-X and TIR-NB proteins: two new families related to disease resistance TIR-NB-LRR proteins encoded in Arabidopsis and other plant genomes. Plant J. 32 (2002) 77-92
20. Dangl J.L., and McDowell J.M. Two modes of pathogen recognition by plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 8575-8576
21. Hofius D., et al. Inducible cell death in plant immunity. Semin. Cancer Biol. 17 (2007) 166-187
22. Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 43 (2005) 205-227
23. Staal J., et al. Transgressive segregation reveals two Arabidopsis TIR-NB-LRR resistance genes effective against Leptosphaeria maculans, causal agent of blackleg disease. Plant J. 46 (2006) 218-230
24. Tian Y., et al. The absence of TIR-type resistance gene analogues in the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genome. J. Mol. Evol. 58 (2004) 40-53
25. Meyers B.C., et al. Plant disease resistance genes encode members of an ancient and diverse protein family within the nucleotide-binding superfamily. Plant J. 20 (1999) 317-332
26. Liu J.J., and Ekramoddoullah A. Isolation, genetic variation and expression of TIR-NBS-LRR resistance gene analogs from western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl. Ex. D. Don.). Mol. Genet. Genomics 270 (2003) 432-441
27. Akita M., and Valkonen J.P. A novel gene family in moss (Physcomitrella patens) shows sequence homology and a phylogenetic relationship with the TIR-NBS class of plant disease resistance genes. J. Mol. Evol. 55 (2000) 595-605
28. Cannon S.B., et al. Diversity, distribution and ancient taxonomic relationships within the TIR and non-TIR NBS-LRR resistance gene subfamilies. J. Mol. Evol. 54 (2002) 548-562
29. van der Biezen E.A., and Jones J. The NB-ARC domain: a novel signalling motif shared by plant resistance gene products and regulators of cell death in animals. Curr. Biol. 8 (1998) R226-R227
30. Leipe D., et al. STAND, a class of P-loop NTPases including animal and plant regulators of programmed cell death: multiple, complex domain architectures, unusual phylogenetic patterns and evolution by horizontal gene transfer. J. Mol. Biol. 343 (2004) 1-28
31. Inohara N., and Nuñez G. NODs: intracellular proteins involved in inflammation and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3 (2003) 371-381
32. Petrilli V., et al. The inflammasome. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) R581
33. Mestre P., and Baulcombe D. Elicitor-mediated oligomerization of the tobacco N disease resistance protein. Plant Cell 18 (2005) 491-501
34. Hibino T., et al. The immune gene repertoire encoded in the purple sea urchin genome. Dev. Biol. 300 (2006) 349-365
35. Fedorova N.D., et al. Comparative analysis of programmed cell death pathways in filamentous fungi. BMC Genomics 6 (2005) 177
36. Beutler B., and Rehli M. Evolution of the TIR, tolls and TLRs: functional inferences from computational biology. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 270 (2002) 1-21
37. Wiens M., et al. Toll-like receptors are part of the innate immune defense system of sponges (Demospongiae: Porifera). Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (2007) 792-804
38. Faigon-Soverna A., et al. A constitutive shade-avoidance mutant implicates TIR-NBS-LRR proteins in Arabidopsis photomorphogenic development. Plant Cell 18 (2006) 2919-2928
39. Liew F.Y., et al. Negative regulation of Toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5 (2005) 446-458
40. O'Neill L.A. How Toll-like receptors signal: what we know and what we don't know. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 18 (2006) 3-9
41. Michael Weaver L., et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana TIR-NB-LRR R-protein, RPP1A; protein localization and constitutive activation of defence by truncated alleles in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant J. 47 (2006) 829-840
42. Marcotte E.M., et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285 (1999) 751-753
43. Dardick C., and Ronald P. Plant and animal pathogen recognition receptors signal through non-RD kinases. PLoS Pathog. 2 (2006) 14-28
44. Fritz J.H., et al. Synergistic stimulation of human monocytes and dendritic cells by Toll-like receptor 4 and NOD1- and NOD2-activating agonists. Eur. J. Immunol. 35 (2005) 2459-2470
45. Gabriëls S.H., et al. cDNA-AFLP combined with functional analysis reveals novel genes involved in the hypersensitive response. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19 (2006) 567-576
46. de la Fuente van Bentem S., et al. Heat shock protein 90 and its co-chaperone protein phosphatase 5 interact with distinct regions of the tomato I-2 disease resistance protein. Plant J. 43 (2005) 284-298
47. Hahn J.S. Regulation of Nod1 by Hsp90 chaperone complex. FEBS Lett. 579 (2005) 4513-4519
48. Mayor A., et al. A crucial function of SGT1 and HSP90 in inflammasome activity links mammalian and plant innate immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 8 (2007) 497-503
49. da Silva Correia J., et al. SGT1 is essential for Nod1 activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 6764-6769
50. Lahaye T. The Arabidopsis RRS1-R disease resistance gene - uncovering the plant's nucleus as the new battlefield of plant defense?. Trends Plant Sci. 7 (2002) 425-427
51. Shen Q.-H., et al. Nuclear activity of MLA immune receptors links isolate-specific and basal disease resistance responses. Science 315 (2007) 1098-1110
52. Uren A.G., et al. Identification of paracaspases and metacaspases: Two ancient families of caspase-like proteins, one of which plays a key role in MALT lymphoma. Mol. Cell 6 (2000) 961-967
53. Siegel R.M. Caspases at the crossroads of immune-cell life and death. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6 (2006) 308-317
54. Vercammen D., et al. Type II metacaspases Atmc4 and Atmc9 of Arabidopsis thaliana cleave substrates after arginine and lysine. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 45329-45336
55. Bozhkov P.V., et al. Cysteine protease mcII-Pa executes programmed cell death during plant embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 14463-14468
56. Hatsugai N., et al. A plant vacuolar protease, VPE, mediates virus-induced hypersensitive cell death. Science 305 (2004) 855-858
57. Rojo E., et al. VPEγ exhibits a caspase-like activity that contributes to defense against pathogens. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 1897-1906
58. Hoeberichts F.A., et al. A tomato metacaspase is upregulated during programmed cell death in Botrytis cinerea-infected leaves. Planta 217 (2003) 517-522
59. Watanabe N., and Lam E. Two Arabidopsis metacaspases AtMCP1b and AtMCP2b are arginine/lysine-specific cysteine proteases and activate apoptosis-like cell death in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 14691-14699
60. Madeo F., et al. A caspase-related protease regulates apoptosis in yeast. Mol. Cell 9 (2002) 911-917
61. Suarez M.F., et al. Metacaspase-dependent programmed cell death is essential for plant embryogenesis. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) R339-R340
62. Bozhkov P., and Jansson C. Autophagy and cell death proteases in plants: two wheels of a funeral cart. J. Exp. Bot. 3 (2007) 136-138
63. Belenghi B., et al. Metacaspase activity of Arabidopsis thaliana is regulated by S-nitrosylation of a critical cysteine residue. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007) 1352-1358
64. Feechan A., et al. A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant disease resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 8054-8059
65. Zeidler D., et al. Innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana: lipopolysaccharides activate nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and induce defense genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 15811-15816
66. Zhivotovsky B. From the nematode and mammals back to the pine tree: on the diversity and evolution of programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ. 9 (2002) 867-869
67. Liu Y., et al. Autophagy regulates programmed cell death during the plant innate immune response. Cell 121 (2005) 567-577
68. Roisin-Bouffay C., et al. Developmental cell death in Dictyostelium does not require paracaspase. J. Biol. Chem. 19 (2004) 11489-11494
69. Kawasaki T., et al. A duplicated pair of Arabidopsis RING-finger E3 ligases contribute to the RPM1- and RPS2-mediated hypersensitive response. Plant J. 44 (2005) 258-270
70. Thomma B., et al. Plant defensins. Planta 216 (2002) 193-202
71. Pfisterer P., et al. CRISP-3, a protein with homology to plant defense proteins is expressed in mouse B cells under the control of Oct2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 (1996) 6160-6168
72. van Eijk M., et al. Characterization of human phagocyte-derived chitotriosidase, a component of innate immunity. Int. Immunol. 17 (2005) 1505-1512
73. Rahme L.G., et al. Plants and animals share functionally common bacterial virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 (2000) 8815-8821
74. He J., et al. The broad host range pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 carries two pathogenicity islands harboring plant and animal virulence genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 2530-2535
75. Jha A.K., et al. Enterococcus faecalis mammalian virulence-related factors exhibit potent pathogenicity in the Arabidopsis thaliana plant model. Infect. Immun. 73 (2005) 464-475
76. Finlay B.B., and McFadden G. Anti-immunology: evasion of the host immune system by bacterial and viral pathogens. Cell 124 (2006) 767-782
77. Chisholm S.T., et al. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 124 (2006) 803-814
78. Lindmark H., et al. Enteric bacteria counteract lipopolysaccharide induction of antimicrobial peptide genes. J. Immunol. 167 (2001) 6920-6923
79. Shao F., et al. A Yersinia effector and a Pseudomonas avirulence protein define a family of cysteine proteases functioning in bacterial pathogenesis. Cell 109 (2002) 575-588
80. Bhattacharjee S., et al. The malaria host-targeting signal is conserved in the Irish potato famine pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 2 (2006) 453-465
81. Winnenburg R., et al. PHI-base: a new database for pathogen host interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) D459-D464
82. Beutler B., et al. Genetic analysis of innate immunity: TIR adapter proteins in innate and adaptive immune responses. Microbes Infect. 6 (2004) 1374-1381
83. Gomez-Gomez L., and Boller T. FLS2: an LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 5 (2000) 1003-1011
84. Swofford, D.L. (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4, Sinauer Associates
85. Yoon H.S., et al. A molecular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 (2004) 809-818
86. Azevedo C., et al. Role of SGT1 in resistance protein accumulation in plant immunity. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 2007-2016