Miscommunication during the anthrax attacks: How events reveal organizational failures

Human Ecology Review

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 119-129

  O'Neill, Karen M ^a   Calia, Jeffrey M ^a   Chess, Caron ^a   Clarke, Lee ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioterrorism; Event structure analysis; Institutions; Organizations; Risk communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547495939     PISSN: 10744827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Beamish, T.D. 2002. Silent Spill: The Organization of an Industrial Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Bresnitz, E.A. and G.T. DiFerdinando, Jr. 2003. Lessons from the anthrax attacks of 2001: The New Jersey experience. Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2, 227-252.
3. Chess, C. 2001. Organizational theory and the stages of risk communication. Risk Analysis 21, 179-187.
4. Chess, C., J. Calia, and K.M. O'Neill. 2004. Communication triage: An anthrax case-study. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism 2, 106-111.
5. Chess, C. and L. Clarke. In press. Risk communication about the anthrax attacks of 2001: The organizational backstory. American Journal of Public Health.
6. Chess, C., A. Saville, M. Tamuz, and M. Greenberg. 1992. The organizational links between risk communication and risk management: The case of Sybron Chemicals Inc. Risk Analysis 12, 431-438.
7. Chess, C., M. Tamuz, and M. Greenberg. 1995. Organizational learning about environmental risk communication: The case of Rohm and Haas' Bristol plant. Society and Natural Resources 8, 57-66.
8. Diamond, M.L. 2001a. Eatontown employees want tests. Asbury Park Press, October 24:A1.
9. Diamond, M.L. 2001b. Two mail sorters' tests are negative. Asbury Park Press, November 1:A1.
10. Diamond, M.L., P. Eichenbaum, and K. Hennessy. 2001, Shore mail handlers: Test us for anthrax; concern mounts with new cases in N.J., Washington. Asbury Park Press, October 26:A1.
11. DiMaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48, 147-160.
12. Dowling, J., and J. Pfeffer. 1975. Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review 18, 122-134.
13. Eichenbaum P. and K. Hennessy. 2001. 2 shore mail sorters ill; new attack threat. Asbury Park Press, October 30, 2001:A1.
14. Griffin, L.J. 1993. Narrative, event-structure analysis, and causal interpretation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology 98, 1094-1133.
15. Hawthorn, G. 1991. Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. Heise, D.R. 1988. Computer analysis of cultural structures. Social Science Computer Review 6, 183-96.
17. Heise, D.R. 1989. Modeling event structures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 14, 139-169.
18. Krimsky, S., and A. Plough. 1988. Environmental Hazards: Communicating Risks as a Social Process. Dover, MA: Auburn House.
19. Lister, S. 2003. NGO legitimacy: Technical issue or social construct? Critique of Anthropology 23, 175-192.
20. Lundgren, R.E. and A. McMakin. 1998. Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
21. Massey, J.E. 2004. Managing organizational images: Crisis response and legitimacy restoration. In D.P. Millar, and R.L. Heath (eds.) Responding to Crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication, 233-246. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. McCullagh, C.B. 1978. Colligation and classification in history. History and Theory 13, 267-84.
23. Mebane F., S. Temin, C.F. Parvanta. 2003. Communicating anthrax in 2001: A comparison of CDC information and print media accounts. Journal of Health Communication 8, Suppl. 1, 50-82.
24. Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363.
25. Meyer, J.W. and W.R. Scott (eds.). 1992. Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. London: Sage.
26. Miles, M. and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
27. National Research Council. 1989. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
28. Perrow, C. 1999 [1984]. Normal Accidents: Risk in a Technological World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29. Pidgeon, N., P. Slovic, and R.E. Kasperson. 2003. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Ragin, C.C. and H.S. Becker. 1992. What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Riederer-Trainor, C., T. Wilkinson, W.D. Snook, G.L. Hoff, R. Griffin and R. Archer. 2005. When bioterrorism strikes: Communication issues for the local health department. Health Promotion Practice 6, 424-429.
32. Robinson S.J. and W.C. Newstetter. 2003. Uncertain science and certain deadlines: CDC responses to the media during the anthrax attacks of 2001. Journal of Health Communication 8, Suppl. 1, 17-34.
33. Scott, W.R. 2001. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Stryker, R. 2000. Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 17, 179-223.
35. Stern, P., and H. Fineberg. 1995. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
36. Tengelsen L., R. Hudson, S. Barnes, and C. Hahn. 2002. Coordinated response to reports of possible anthrax contamination, Idaho, 2001. Emerging Infectious Diseases 8, 1093-1095.
37. Thompson, E.P. 1978. The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. London: Merlin Press.
38. Tilly, C. 1981. As Sociology Meets History. New York: Academic Press.
39. Vanderford, M.L. 2003. Communication lessons learned in the emergency operations center during CDC's anthrax response: A commentary. Journal of Health Communication 8, Suppl. 1, 11-12.
40. Wynne, B. 1989. Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information. Environment 31, 10-15, 33.