Creation and critique of studies of diagnostic accuracy: Use of the STARD and QUADAS methodological quality assessment tools

Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 93-102

  Cook, Chad ^a   Cleland, Joshua ^b   Huijbregts, Peter ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Diagnostic accuracy; Methodological quality assessment tools; QUADAS; Special tests; STARD

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERVICOBRACHIAL NEURALGIA; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; ORTHOPEDICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY STUDIES; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDS FOR REPORTING OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;

EID: 34547491189     PISSN: 10669817     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/106698107790819945     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bossuyt PMM. The quality of reporting in diagnostic test research: Getting better, still not optimal. Clin Chem 2004;50:465-467.
2. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-1063.
3. Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:9.
4. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, et al. The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1129-1135.
5. Woolf SF. Do clinical practice guidelines define good medical care? The need for good science and the disclosure of uncertainty when defining "best practices." Chest 1998;113(3 Suppl):166S-171S.
6. nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
7. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:389-391.
8. Spurling RG, Scoville WB. Lateral rupture of the cervical intervertebral disc. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1944;78:350-358.
9. Uchihara T, Furukawa T, Tsukagoshi H. Compression of brachial plexus as a diagnostic test of cervical cord lesion. Spine 1994;19:2170-2173.
10. Shah KC, Rajshekhar V. Reliability of diagnosis of soft cervical disc prolapse using Spurling's test. Br J Neurosurg 2004;18:480-483.
11. Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, et al. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2003;28:52-62.
12. Viikari-Juntura E, Porras M, Lassonen EM. Validity of clinical tests in the diagnosis of root compression in cervical disc disease. Spine 1989;14:253-257.
13. Sandmark H, Nisell R. Validity of five common manual neck pain provoking tests.Scand J Rehabil Med 1995;27:131-136.
14. Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa K. The Spurling test and cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2002;27:156-159.
15. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J 2003;44:639-650.
16. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J 2003;44:635-638.
17. Jaeschke R, Meade M, Guyatt G, Keenan SP, Cook DJ. How to use diagnostic test articles in the intensive care unit: Diagnosing weanability using f/vt. Crit Care Med 1997;25:1514-1521.
18. Fritz JM, Wainner RS. Examining diagnostic tests: An evidence-based perspective. Phys Ther 2001;81(9):1546-1564.
19. Cibulka MT, Kodekoff R. Clinical usefulness of a cluster of sacroiliac joint tests in patients with and without low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999;29:83-89.
20. Kim SH, Ha KI, Han KY. Biceps load test: A clinical test for superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in shoulders with recurrent anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:300-303.
21. Glaser J, Cure J, Bailey K, Morrow D. Cervical spinal cord compression and the Hoffmann sign. Iowa Orthop J 2001;21:49-52.
22. Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Family Practice 2004;21:4-10.
23. Lew PC, Briggs CA. Relationship between the cervical component of the slump test and change in hamstring muscle tension. Man Ther 1997; 2:98-105.
24. Johnson EK, Chiarello CM. The slump test: The effects of head and lower extremity position on knee extension. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997; 26:310-317.
25. Lew PC, Morrow CJ, Lew AM. The effect of neck and leg flexion and their sequence on the lumbar spinal cord: Implications in low back pain and sciatica. Spine 1994; 19:2421-2424.
26. Cameron DM, Bohannon RW, Owen SV. Influence of hip position on measurements of the straight leg raise test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;19:168-172.
27. Hall TM, Elvey RL. Nerve trunk pain: Physical diagnosis and treatment. Man Ther 1999;4:63-73.
28. Charnley, J. Orthopaedic signs in the diagnosis of disc protrusion with special reference to the straight-leg-raising test. Lancet 1951;1:186-192.
29. McCombe PF, Fairbank JT, Cockersole BC, Pynsent PB. Reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 1989;14:908-918.
30. Bossyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:W1-W12.
31. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Clin Chem 2003;49:1-6.
32. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy. Explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003;49:7-18.
33. Whiting P, Harbord R, Kleijnen J. No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:19.
34. Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, Wainner R, Magel J, Rendeiro D, et al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 2002;27:2835-2843.
35. Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:920-928.
36. Fritz JM, Childs JD, Flynn TW. Pragmatic application of a clinical prediction rule in primary care to identify patients with low back pain with a good prognosis following a brief spinal manipulation intervention. BMC Family Practice 2005;6:29.
37. Tseng YL, Wang WTJ, Chen WY, Hou TJ, Chen TC, Lieu FK. Predictors for the immediate responders to cervical manipulation in patients with neck pain. Man Ther 2006;11:306-315.
38. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL. Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: Use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education. Phys Ther 2007;87:9-23.