Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative

Croatian Medical Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 635-638

  Bossuyt, Patrick M ^a   Reitsma, Johannes B ^b   Bruns, David E ^b   Gatsonis, Constantine A ^b   Glasziou, Paul P ^b   Irwig, Les M ^b   Lijmer, Jeroen G ^b   Moher, David ^b   Rennie, Drummond ^b   De Vet, Henrica C W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0242443903     PISSN: 03539504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH, Haynes RB, Drummond M. A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ 1986;134:587-94.
2. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991;11:88-94.
3. Kent DL, Larson EB. Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1992;27:245-54.
4. Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI, Greenland P. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications. Ann Intern Med 1981;94(4 Pt 2):557-92.
5. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. The selection of diagnostic tests. In: Sackett D, editor. Clinical epidemiology. 2nd edition. Boston/Toronto/London: Little, Brown and Company, 1991. p.47-57.
6. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-98.
7. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995;274:645-51.
8. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000;217:105-14.
9. de Vries SO, Hunink MG, Polak JF. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves as a technique for meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in peripheral arterial disease. Acad Radiol 1996;3:361-9.
10. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests [published erratum appears in JAMA 2000;283:1963]. JAMA 1999; 282:1061-6.
11. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests [published erratum appears in JAMA 2000;283:1963]. JAMA 1999; 282:1061-6.
12. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9.
13. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001;285:1987-91.
14. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials. A comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001; 285:1992-5.
15. Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [published erratum appears in JAMA 1998;279:510]. JAMA 1997;277:927-34.
16. Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [published erratum appears in JAMA 1998;279:510]. JAMA 1997;277:927-34.
17. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7-18.
18. Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C; CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials). Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2001;285:1996-9.
19. Knottnerus JA. The effects of disease verification and referral on the relationship between symptoms and diseases. Med Decis Making 1987;7:139-48.
20. Panzer RJ, Suchman AL, Griner PF. Workup bias in prediction research. Med Decis Making 1987;7:115-9.
21. Begg CB. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Stat Med 1987;6:411-23.