In vitro inhibition of bacterial growth using different dental adhesive systems

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 388-393

  Walter, Ricardo ^a,b   Duarte, Wagner R ^a   Pereira, Patricia N R ^a   Heymann, Harald O ^a   Swift Jr , Edward J ^a   Arnold, Roland R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLUMA COMFORT BOND; GLUTARALDEHYDE; IBOND; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ONE UP BOND F; ONE-UP-BOND F; RESIN CEMENT; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACTINOMYCES VISCOSUS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DRUG EFFECT; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; LACTOBACILLUS; STREPTOCOCCUS; TIME;

ACTINOMYCES VISCOSUS; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLUTARAL; GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA; LACTOBACILLUS; METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; STREPTOCOCCUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547483354     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/06-115     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ & Syed SA (1982) Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp Journal of Oral Pathology 11(6) 439-450.
2. Anderson MH, Loesche WJ & Charbeneau GT (1985) Bacteriologic study of a basic fuchsin caries-disclosing dye The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 54(1) 51-55.
3. Boston DW & Graver HT (1989) Histological study of an acid red caries-disclosing dye Operative Dentistry 14(4) 186-192.
4. Boston DW & Liao J (2004) Staining of non-carious human coronal dentin by caries dyes Operative Dentistry 29(3) 280-286.
5. Banerjee A, Kidd EA & Watson TF (2003) In vitro validation of carious dentin removed using different excavation criteria American Journal of Dentistry 16(4) 228-230.
6. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA & Wilson NH (1999) Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices Primary Dental Care 6(1) 17-20.
7. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA & Wilson NH (1999) Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom Quintessence International 30(4) 234-242.
8. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW & Mjör IA (2001) Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement Journal of Dentistry 29(5) 317-324.
9. Mjör IA & Toffenetti F (2000) Secondary caries: A literature review with case reports Quintessence International 31(3) 165-179.
10. Fontana M & González-Cabezas C (2000) Secondary caries and restoration replacement: An unresolved problem Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 21(1) 15-30.
11. Emilson CG & Bergenholtz G (1993) Antibacterial activity of dentinal bonding agents Quintessence International 24(7) 511-515.
12. Imazato S (2003) Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems Dental Materials 19(6) 449-457.
13. Munksgaard EC & Asmussen E (1984) Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde Journal of Dental Research 63(8) 1087-1089.
14. Felton D, Bergenholtz G & Cox CF (1989) Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment Journal of Dental Research 68(3) 491-495.
15. Fraga RC, Siqueira JF Jr & de Uzeda M (1996) In vitro evaluation of antibacterial effects of photo-cured glass ionomer liners and dentin bonding agents during setting The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 76(5) 483-486.
16. Herrera M, Carrion P, Bravo M & Castillo A (2000) Antibacterial activity of four dentin bonding systems International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 15(4) 305-309.
17. Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Göhring TN & Waltimo TM (2004) Glutaraldehyde in bonding systems disinfects dentin in vitro The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 6(1) 61-64.
18. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC & Turck M (1966) Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method American Journal of Clinical Pathology 45(4) 493-496.
19. nd ed NCCLS, Villanova, P aeruginosa.
20. Imazato S, Kuramoto A, Kaneko T, Ebisu S & Russell RR (2002) Comparison of antibacterial activity of simplified adhesive systems American Journal of Dentistry 15(6) 356-360.
21. Schmalz G, Ergücü Z & Killer KA (2004) Effect of dentin on the antibacterial activity of dentin bonding agents Journal of Endodontics 30(5) 352-358.
22. Ergücü Z, Killer KA & Schmalz G (2005) Influence of dentin on the effectiveness of antibacterial agents Journal of Endodontics 31(2) 124-129.
23. Prati C, Fava F, Di Gioia D, Selighini M & Pashley DH (1993) Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems Dental Materials 9(6) 338-343.