Cumulative Intertrial Inhibition in Repeated Visual Search

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 518-529

  Takeda, Yuji ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

intertrial inhibition; object based mechanism; visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERIODICITY; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PERIODICITY; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34547481863     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.518     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bennet P.J., and Pratt J. The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 76-80
2. Christie J., and Klein R.M. Negative priming for spatial location?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (2001) 24-38
3. Hillstrom A.P. Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 800-817
4. Horowitz T.S., and Wolfe J.M. Visual search has no memory. Nature 394 (1998, August 6) 575-577
5. Horowitz T.S., and Wolfe J.M. Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 272-285
6. Horowitz T.S., and Wolfe J.M. Memory for rejected distractors in visual search?. Visual Cognition 10 (2003) 257-298
7. Irwin D.E. Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (1992) 307-317
8. Kahneman D., Treisman A., and Gibbs B. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992) 175-219
9. Klein R. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature 334 (1988, August 4) 430-431
10. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 138-147
11. Klein R.M., and MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 346-352
12. Kristjánsson A. In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 328-332
13. Kunar M.A., Humphreys G.W., Smith K.J., and Watson D.G. When a reappearance is old news: Visual marking survives occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 185-198
14. Luck S.J., and Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390 (1997, November 20) 279-281
15. Maljkovic V., and Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition 22 (1994) 657-672
16. Maljkovic V., and Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics 58 (1996) 977-991
17. Milliken B., Tipper S.P., Houghton G., and Lupiáñez J. Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1280-1296
18. Müller H.J., and von Mühlenen A. Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1591-1605
19. Neill W.T., and Valdes L.A. Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (1992) 565-576
20. Neill W.T., Valdes L.A., Terry K.M., and Gorfein D.S. Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (1992) 993-1000
21. Ogawa H., Takeda Y., and Yagi A. Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 125-129
22. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W., Heinke D., and Cooper A.C.G. Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 540-560
23. Pashler H. Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics 41 (1987) 191-201
24. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F., Wang R.F., Irwin D.E., and McCarley J.S. Visual search has memory. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 287-292
25. Scholl B.J., and Pylyshyn Z.W. Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology 38 (1999) 259-290
26. Snyder J.J., and Kingstone A. Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited?. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 452-458
27. Takeda Y. Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 71-76
28. Takeda Y., and Yagi A. Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 927-934
29. Tanaka Y., and Shimojo S. Repetition priming reveals sustained facilitation and transient inhibition in reaction time. Journal Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1421-1435
30. Theeuwes J., Kramer A.F., and Atchley P. Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 130-134
31. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 37 A (1985) 571-590
32. Tipper S.P., Brehaut J.C., and Driver J. Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 492-504
33. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature integration theory of perception. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
34. von Mühlenen A., Müller H.J., and Müller D. Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 309-314
35. Watson D.G. Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 74-84
36. Watson D.G., and Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 90-122
37. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W., and Olivers C.N.L. Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 180-186
38. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 (1994) 202-238
39. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. In: Pashler H. (Ed). Attention (1998), Psychology Press, Hove, United Kingdom 13-74