Outcomes after off-pump reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting

Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 29-32

  Morris, Cullen D ^a   Puskas, John D ^a,c   Pusca, Sorin V ^a   Lattouf, Omar M ^a   Cooper, William A ^a   Vassiliades, Thomas A ^a   Chen, Edward P ^a   Thourani, Vinod H ^a   Kilgo, Patrick D ^b   Guyton, Robert A ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

High risk CABG; OPCAB; Redo; Redo CABG; Reoperative CABG

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA DISEASE; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTERY INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; ON PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; TRANSFUSION;

EID: 34547421817     PISSN: 15569845     EISSN: 15590879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.IMI.0000250499.99341.97     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs. conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and one-year graft patency, cost, and quality of life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1841-1849.
2. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump vs. conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:797-808.
3. Dewey TM, Magee MJ, Acuff T, et al. Beating heart surgery reduces mortality in the reoperative bypass patient. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(Suppl 4):S301-S316.
4. Alamanni F, Pompilio G, Polvani G, et al. Off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: technical aspects and early results. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(Suppl 4):S432-S444.
5. Mack MJ. Off-pump surgery and alternatives to standard operation in redo coronary surgery. J Card Surg. 2004;19:313-319.
6. Lytle BW. Coronary artery reoperations. In: Cohn, LH Edmunds LH, eds. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. New York: McGraw-Hill;2003:659-679.
7. Dewey TM, Mack MJ. Myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass. In: Cohn LH, Edmunds LH, eds.Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. New York: McGraw-Hill;2003:609-625.
8. Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. Safety and efficacy of off-pump bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:704.
9. Stamou SC, Pfister AJ, Dangas G, et al. Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1383.
10. Craver JM, Hodakowski GT, Shen Y, et al. Third-time coronary artery bypass operations: surgical strategy and results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1801-1807.
11. Trehan N, Mishra YK. Malhotra off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1026.
12. Kleisli T, Cheng W, Jacobs MJ, et al. In the current era, complete revascularization improves survival after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1283-1291.
13. Osaka S, Ohsawa H, Nabuchi A. Redo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for high risk hemodialysis patients. J Card Surg. 2002;17:383-386.
14. Vassiliades TA, Nielsen JL. Alternative approaches in off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3:203-206.
15. Foster EM. Propensity score matching: an illustrative analysis of dose response. Med Care. 2003;41:1183-1192.
16. Di Mauro M, Iaco AL, Contini M, et al. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:81-87.