A model for research into course management systems: Bridging technology and learning theory

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 149-173

  Malikowski, Steven R ^a   Thompson, Merton E ^a   Theis, John G ^a  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547420329     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/1002-1T50-27G2-H3V7     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004 (Research. Report No. 0-9677741-8-7). Needham, MA: Sloan. Center for Online Education.
2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, 2005 (Research Report No. 978-0-9766714-2-8). Needham, MA: Sloan-Center for Online Education.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd. ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1.995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
5. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1991). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 133-155). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
6. Ansorge, C. J., & Bendus, O. (2003). The pedagogical impact of course management systems on faculty, students and institutions. In R. H. Bruning, C. A. Horn, & L. M. PytlikZillig (Eds.), Web-based learning: What do we know? Where do we go? (pp. xxii, 275). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Pub.
7. Arabasz, P., Pirani, J. A., & Fawcett, D. (2003). Supporting e-learning in higher education (Research Report No. Vol. 3, 2003). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
8. Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1.991). Theory into practice: How do we link? In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 88-101). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
9. Bennett, J., & Bennett, L. (2003). A review of factors that influence the diffusion of innovation when structuring a faculty training program. Internet & Higher Education, 6(1), 53.
10. Berge, Z. L., & Collins, M. P. (1995a). Computer mediated communication and the online classroom (Vol. 1 : Overview and perspectives). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
11. Berge, Z. L., & Collins, M. P. (1995b). Computer mediated communication and the online classroom (Vol. 2: Higher education). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
12. Berge, Z. L., & Collins, M. P. (1995c). Computer mediated communication and the online classroom (Vol. 3: Distance learning). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
13. Burton, J. K., Moore, D. M., & Magliaro, S. G. (2004). Behaviorism and instructional technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational, communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 3-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Clark, R. E., & Sugrue, B. M. (1.991). Research on instructional media, 1978-1988. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 327-343). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
15. Doyle, B. (2005). Where the wild CMSs are! EContent, 28(12), 1.8-18.
16. Driscoll, M. P. (1.994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
19. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
20. Dutton, W. H., Cheong, P. H., & Park, N. (2004). An ecology of constraints on e-learning in higher education: The case of a virtual, learning environment. Prometheus, 22(2), 131-149.
21. Ertmer, P., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-71.
22. Falvo, D. A., & Johnson, B. F. (2005, March). Use and implementation of learning management systems in the US. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, 2005 16th Annual International Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
23. Foshay, W. R., & Preese, F. (2005). Do we need authoring systems? A commercial perspective. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 2(3), 249-260.
24. Foshay, W. R., Silber, K. H., & Stelnicki, M. B. (2003). Writing training materials that work: How to train anyone to do anything. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
25. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
26. Green, K. (2001, Accessed, on. 1.-5-06). Ecommerce comes slowly to the campus, from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summar.ies/2000/index.html.
27. Hannafin, M. J., & Rieber, L. P. (1989a). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer based instructional technologies, Part 1. Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(2), 91-101.
28. Hannafin, M. J., & Rieber, L. P. (1989b). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer based instructional technologies, Part 2. Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(2), 102-114.
29. Hooper, S. (1.992). Cooperation, learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21-38.
30. Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. (1.988). Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous groups on the learning of progressively complex concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(4), 413-424.
31. Hooper, S., & Reinartz, T. J. (2002). Educational multimedia. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. ix, 415). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
32. Hooper, S., Ward, T., Hannafin, M., & Clark, H. (1989). The effects of aptitude composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(2), 5-1.8.
33. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1986). Computer-assisted cooperative learning. Educational Technology, 26(1), 12-18.
34. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 785-811). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1.998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
36. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
37. Krendl, K. A., Ware, W. H., Reid, K. A., & Warren, R. (1996). Learning by any other name: Communication research traditions in learning and media. In D. H, Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 93-111). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
38. Kvavik, R. B., & Caruso, J. B. (2005). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005: Convenience, connection, control, and learning: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
39. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making student's evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187.
40. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. (2006). Desire2Learn Implementation Project. Retrieved 8-21-06, 2006, from http://d21.project. mnscu.edu/.
41. Morgan, G. (2003). Faculty use of course management systems. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
42. Passmore, D. L. (2000, December 2000). Impediments to adoption of Web-based course delivery among university faculty. ALN Magazine, 4.
43. Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. viii, 1210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1988). Adapting instruction to learner performance and background variables. In D. FI. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 227-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, SC: North Carolina State University.
46. Russell, T. L. (2006). No significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved 2-17-2006, from http://www.nosignificantdiffe.rence.org/.
47. Salisbury, D. F. (1988). Effective drill, and practice strategies. In D. H. Jonassen. (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 103-123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Snelbecker, G. E. (1999). Some thoughts about theories, perfection, and instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A. new paradigm, of instructional theory (pp. 31-47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A. brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191.
50. Wagner, W., & Gagné, R. M. (1988). Designing computer assisted instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 35-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates.
51. Winn, W. (2004). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 79-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Woods, R., Baker, J. D., & Hopper, D. (2004). Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of Web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. Internet & Higher Education, 7(4), 281-297.