Forced quantitative randomized response model: A new device

Metrika

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 243-257

  Gjestvang, Christopher R ^a   Singh, Sarjinder ^a  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forced questions; Randomized response model; Sensitive variable

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547364383     PISSN: 00261335     EISSN: 1435926X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00184-006-0108-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bar-Lev SK, Bobovitch E, Boukai B (2004) A note on randomized response models for quantitative data. Metrika 60:255-260
2. Bhargava M (1996) An investigation into the efficiencies of certain randomized response strategies. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
3. Bhargava M, Singh R (2001) Efficiency comparison of certain randomized response schemes with U-model. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 54(1): 1.9-28
4. Bhargava M, Singh R (2002) On the efficiency comparison of certain randomized response strategies. Metrika 55(3):191-197
5. Cochran WG(1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
6. Eichhorn BH, Hayre LS (1983) Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative data. J Stat Plan Infer 7:307-316
7. Fox JA, Tracy PE (1986) Randomized response: a method for sensitive surveys. SAGE Publications, London
8. Gjestvang CR, Singh S (2006) A new randomized response model. J R Stat Soc B 68:523-530
9. Kuk AYC (1990) Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika 77:436-438
10. Lanke J (1975) On the choice of the unrelated question in Simons version of randomised response. J Am Stat Assoc 70:80-83
11. Lanke J (1976). On the degree of protection in randomized interviews. Int Stat Rev 44:197-203
12. Leysieffer FW, Warner SL (1976) Respondent jeopardy and optimal designs in randomized response models. J Am Stat Assoc 71:649-656.h
13. Liu PT, Chow LP (1976a) A new discrete quantitative randomized response model J Am Stat Assoc 71:72-73
14. Liu PT, Chow LP (1976b) The efficiency of the multiple trial randomized response technique. Biometrics, 32:607-618.
15. Mangat NS (1994) An improved randomized response strategy. J R Stat Soc B 56:93-95
16. Mangat NS, Singh R (1990) An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77(2):439-442 Moors JJA (1997) A critical evaluation of Mangat's two-step procedure in randomized response. Discussion paper at Center for Economic Research. Tilburg University, The Netherlands
17. Nayak TK (1994) On randomized response surveys for estimating a proportion. Commun Stat Theory Methods, 23(1):3303-3321
18. Singh S (2003) Advanced sampling theory with applications: how Michael "Selected" Amy. Kluwer, The Netherlands
19. Stem DE, Steinhorst RK (1984) Telephone interview and mail questionnaire applications of the randomized response model. J Am Stat Assoc 79:555-564
20. Tracy DS, Mangat NS (1996) Some developments in randomized response sampling during the last decade - A follow up of review by Chaudhuri and Mukerjee. J Appl Stat Sci 4(2/3): 147-158
21. Warner SL (1965) Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc 60:63-69
22. Zou G (1997) Two-stage randomized response procedures as single stage procedures. Aust J Stat 39:235-236