On the efficiency comparison of certain randomized response strategies

Metrika

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 191-197

  Bhargava, Manoj ^a,b   Singh, Ravindra ^a  

^a PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b CSK HIMACHAL PRADESH AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Design probabilities; Efficiency comparison; Jeopardy functions; Privacy protection; Randomized response technique; Warner's model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036384535     PISSN: 00261335     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001840100140     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Dowling T.A., Shachtman R.H. (1975) On the relative efficiency of randomized response models. J Amer Statist Assoc 70:84-87.
2. Folsom R.E., Greenberg B.G., Horvitz D.G., Abernathy J.R. (1973) The two alternate questions randomized response model for human surveys. J Amer Statist Assoc 68:525-530.
3. Greenberg B.G., Abul-Ela A.L.A., Simmons W.R., Horvitz D.G. (1969) The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework. J Amer Statist Assoc 64:520-539.
4. Leysieffer F.W., Warner S.L. (1976) Respondent jeopardy and optimal designs in randomized response models. J Amer Statist Assoc 71:649-656.
5. Mangat N.S. (1994) An improved randomized response strategy. Jl R Statist Soc Ser B 56:93-95.
6. Mangat N.S., Singh R. (1990) An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77:439-442.
7. Moors J.J.A. (1971) Optimization of the unrelated question randomized response model. J Amer Statist Assoc 66:627-629.
8. Warner S.L. (1965) Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Amer Statist Assoc 60:63-69.