A new design criterion for robust parameter experiments

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 279-295

  Del Castillo, Enrique ^a,c   Alvarez, María Jesús ^b,d   Ilzarbe, Laura ^b,d   Viles, Elizabeth ^b,d  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^c Departments of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and of Statistics   (United States)

^d Department of Industrial Management ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Design optimality; Genetic algorithms; Noise factors; Robust parameter design

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

DESIGN OPTIMALITY; NOISE FACTORS; ROBUST PARAMETER DESIGN;

ROBUST CONTROL;

EID: 34547346634     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2007.11917693     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BAZARAA, M. S.; SHERALI, H. D.; and SHETTY, C. M. (1993). Nonlinear Programming - Theory and Algorithms, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.
2. BINGHAM, D. R. and LI, W. (2002). "A Class of Optimal Robust Parameter Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 244-259.
3. BORROR, C. M.; MONTGOMERY, D. C.; and MYERS, R. H. (2002). "Evaluation of Statistical Designs for Experiments Involving Noise Variables". Journal of Quality Technology 34(3), pp. 54-70.
4. BORROR, C. M. and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (2000). "Mixed Resolution Designs as Alternatives to Taguchi Inner/Outer Array Designs for Robust Design Problems". Quality and Reliability Engineering International 16, pp. 117-127.
5. BORKOWSKI, J. J. and LUCAS, J. M. (1997). "Design of Mixed Resolution for Process Robustness Studies". Technometrics 39, pp. 63-70.
6. BOX, G. E. P. and BENHKEN, D. W. (1960). "Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables". Technometrics 2, pp. 455-475.
7. BOX, G. E. P. and DRAPER, N. R. (1987). Empirical model building and response surfaces. Wiley, New York, NY.
8. BOX, G. E. P. and JONES, S. (1990). "Designing Products That Are Robust to the Environment. Report Series in Quality and Productivity. CPQI, University of Wisconsin, Number 56.
9. DRAPER, N. R. and LIN, D. K. J. (1990). "Connections Between Two-Level Designs of Resolutions III* and V". Technometrics 32(3), pp. 187-194.
10. GOLDFARB, H. B.; BORROR, C. M.; MONTGOMERY, D. C.; and ANDERSON-COOK, C. M. (2005). "Using Genetic Algorithms to Generate Mixture-Process Experimental Designs Involving Control and Noise Variables". Journal of Quality Technology 37(1), pp. 60-74.
11. HARTLEY, H. O. (1959). "Smallest Composite Designs for Quadratic Response Surfaces". Biometrics, December 1959, pp. 611-624.
12. HEREDIA-LANGNER, A.; CARLYLE, W. M.; MONTGOMERY, D. C.; BORROR, C. M.; and RUNGER, G. C. (2003). "Genetic Algorithms for the Construction of D-Optimal Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 35(1), pp. 28-47.
13. HOKE, A. T. (1974). "Economical Second-Order Designs Based on Irregular Fractions of the 3n Factorial". Technometrics 16(3), pp. 375-384.
14. HOUCK, C. R.; JOINES, J. A.; and KAY, M. G. (1996). "A Genetic Algorithm for Function Optimization: A Matlab Implementation". Dept. of Industrial Engineering, North Carolina State University at Raleigh.
15. LUCAS, J. M. (1994). "How to Achieve a Robust Process Using Response Surface Methodology". Journal of Quality Technology 26, pp. 248-260.
16. MEE, R. W. (2004). "Efficient Two-Level Designs for Estimating All Main Effects and Two-Factor Interaccions". Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 400-412.
17. MIRO, G. and DEL CASTILLO, E. (2004). "Two Approaches for Enhancing the Dual Response Approach to Robust Parameter Design". Journal of Quality Technology 36(2), pp. 154-168.
18. MONTGOMERY, D. C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th ed. Wiley, New York, NY.
19. MORRIS, M. D. (2000). "A Class of Three-Level Experimental Designs for Response Surface Modeling". Technometrics 42, pp. 111-121.
20. MYERS, R. H. (1991). "Response Surface Methodology in Quality Improvement". Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 20(2), pp. 457-476.
21. MYERS, R. H.; KIM, Y.; and GRIFFITHS, K. L. (1997). "Response Surface Methods and the Use of Noise Variables. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 429-440.
22. MYERS, R. H. and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley, New York, NY.
23. NEFF, A. R. and MYERS, R. H. (1999). "Recent Developments in Response Surface Methodology and Its Applications in Industry". In: Statistical Process Monitoring and Optimization, Sung H. Park and G. G. Vining, eds.Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 457-481.
24. NOTZ, W. (1982). "Minimal Point Second Order Designs". Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 6, pp. 47-58.
25. ORTIZ, JR., F.; SIMPSON, J. R.; and PIGNATIELLO, JR., J. J. (2004). "A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multiple Response Optimization". Journal of Quality Technology 36(4), pp. 432-449.
26. ROQUEMORE, K. G. (1976). "Hybrid Designs for Quadratic Response Surfaces". Technometrics 18(4), pp. 419-423.
27. SHOEMAKER, A. C.; TSUI, K.-L.; and WU, C. F. J. (1991). "Economical Experimentation Methods for Robust Design". Technometrics 33, pp. 415-427.
28. TAGUCHI, G. (1987). System of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Cost. Quality Resources, White Plains, NJ.
29. WU, C. F. J. and HAMADA, M. (2000). Experiments. Planing, Analysis and Parameter Design Optimization, Wiley, New York, NY.