-
2
-
-
13844283060
-
-
Fine, M, Meshii, M, Wayman, C, Eds, Academic Press: New York
-
Nishiyama, Z. Martensitic Transformation; Fine, M., Meshii, M., Wayman, C., Eds.; Academic Press: New York: 1978: pp 23.
-
(1978)
Martensitic Transformation
, pp. 23
-
-
Nishiyama, Z.1
-
3
-
-
0035476990
-
-
Podzorov, V.; Kim, B. G.; Kiryukhin, V.; Gershenson, M. E.; Cheong, S.-W. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 140406.
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.64
, pp. 140406
-
-
Podzorov, V.1
Kim, B.G.2
Kiryukhin, V.3
Gershenson, M.E.4
Cheong, S.-W.5
-
4
-
-
0000483978
-
-
Kajimoto, R.; Yoshizawa, H.; Kawano, H.; Kuwahara, H.; Tokura, Y.; Ohoyama, K.; Ohashi, M. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 9506.
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.60
, pp. 9506
-
-
Kajimoto, R.1
Yoshizawa, H.2
Kawano, H.3
Kuwahara, H.4
Tokura, Y.5
Ohoyama, K.6
Ohashi, M.7
-
5
-
-
0001406668
-
-
Jung, J. H; Lee, H. J.; Noh, T. W.; Choi, E. J.; Moritomo, Y.; Wang, Y. J.; Wei, X. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, 481.
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.62
, pp. 481
-
-
Jung, J.H.1
Lee, H.J.2
Noh, T.W.3
Choi, E.J.4
Moritomo, Y.5
Wang, Y.J.6
Wei, X.7
-
6
-
-
13844266087
-
-
Kolb, P. W.; Romero, D. B.; Drew, H. D.; Moritomo, Y.; Souchkov, A. B.; Ogale, S. B. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 224415.
-
(2004)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.70
, pp. 224415
-
-
Kolb, P.W.1
Romero, D.B.2
Drew, H.D.3
Moritomo, Y.4
Souchkov, A.B.5
Ogale, S.B.6
-
7
-
-
0001401041
-
-
Moritomo, Y.; Kuwahara, H.; Tomioka, Y.; Tokura, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55, 7549.
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.55
, pp. 7549
-
-
Moritomo, Y.1
Kuwahara, H.2
Tomioka, Y.3
Tokura, Y.4
-
8
-
-
0000715313
-
-
Lee, H. J.; Jung, J. H.; Lee, Y. S.; Ahn, J. S.; Noh, T. W.; Kim, K. H.; Cheong, S.-W. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 5251.
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.60
, pp. 5251
-
-
Lee, H.J.1
Jung, J.H.2
Lee, Y.S.3
Ahn, J.S.4
Noh, T.W.5
Kim, K.H.6
Cheong, S.-W.7
-
9
-
-
0342923305
-
-
Schiffer, P.; Ramirez, A. P.; Bao, W.; Cheong, S.-W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 3336.
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. Lett
, vol.75
, pp. 3336
-
-
Schiffer, P.1
Ramirez, A.P.2
Bao, W.3
Cheong, S.-W.4
-
10
-
-
0029267575
-
-
Valaskovic, G. A.; Holton, M.; Morrison, G. H. Appl. Opt. 1995, 34, 1215.
-
(1995)
Appl. Opt
, vol.34
, pp. 1215
-
-
Valaskovic, G.A.1
Holton, M.2
Morrison, G.H.3
-
11
-
-
84858088032
-
-
A model of NSOM contrast treats the NSOM probe as a shadowed point source. Rays at larger angles to the normal transmit into the far-field with less loss because they experience fewer reflections between the metalized tip and sample. Accordingly, s and p modes have different reflectivities and transmit with different efficiencies. Alternatively, the metalized tip in close proximity to the sample can be thought of as an effective waveguide. Depending on the properties of the sample, the waveguide transmission can be sensitive to Ex or Ez, which is present in the near-field. Boundary conditions require continuity of the tangential electric field. As a result, all modes from Ex are cut off when the tip-sample spacing goes below λ/2 for a metal sample. Because this constraint is more severe for metal samples, their response to Ex is reduced more than it is for insulators. Conversely, the condition of tangential continu
-
z. Surface currents act to support the tangential H field. Higher conductivity allows metals to transmit this mode more effectively than insulators.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
34547338206
-
-
In principle, the differences in bond lengths within the ab plane that give rise to optical anisotropy are temperature dependant. Additionally, the polarization used from scan to scan may not be the same because it was necessary to adjust the polarization with temperature to compensate for the temperature-dependant polarization rotation of fiber bends in the cryostat. Furthermore, the collection efficiency for a particular polarization was likely changing as a function of temperature. In general, the far-field collection efficiency of NSOM systems is dependant of the geometry of the collection system. In principle, the lens and parabolic mirror used in these experiments provides symmetric collection with no polarization sensitivity. In reality, the system demonstrates significant polarization sensitivity due to differences in focus, alignment, and orientation of the optical axes with the sample and asymmetric blocking of light in the optical path by the z-approach mechanism. In
-
In principle, the differences in bond lengths within the ab plane that give rise to optical anisotropy are temperature dependant. Additionally, the polarization used from scan to scan may not be the same because it was necessary to adjust the polarization with temperature to compensate for the temperature-dependant polarization rotation of fiber bends in the cryostat. Furthermore, the collection efficiency for a particular polarization was likely changing as a function of temperature. In general, the far-field collection efficiency of NSOM systems is dependant of the geometry of the collection system. In principle, the lens and parabolic mirror used in these experiments provides symmetric collection with no polarization sensitivity. In reality, the system demonstrates significant polarization sensitivity due to differences in focus, alignment, and orientation of the optical axes with the sample and asymmetric blocking of light in the optical path by the z-approach mechanism. In an alternative interpretation of the fading contrast, the FMM and COI phases mix uniformly and gradually with temperature. However, this picture is inconsistent with the results of the far-field imaging where regions of different phase are well demarcated.
-
-
-
|