Communication correlates of perceived machiavellianism of supervisors: Communication orientations and outcomes

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 127-142

  Teven, Jason J ^a   McCroskey, James C ^b   Richmond, Virginia P ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Machiavellianism; Superior Subordinate Interpersonal Relationships; Supervisor Characteristics; Supervisor Effectiveness; Supervisor Influence; Supervisor Subordinate Communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547305762     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370600650829     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahmed, S. M., & Stewart, R. A., (1981). Factor analysis of the Machiavellian scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 113–115 [CSA]
2. Appelbaum, S. H., & Hughes, B., (1998). Ingratiation as a political tactic: Effects within the organization. Management Decision, 36, 85–95 [CROSSREF][CSA]
3. Bell, R. A., & Daly, J. A., (1985). Some communicator correlates of loneliness. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 121–142 [CSA]
4. Boster, F. J., & Stiff, J. B., (1984). Compliance-gaining message selection behavior. Human Communication Research, 10, 539–556 [CROSSREF][CSA]
5. Burgoon, M., (1971). The relationship between willingness to manipulate others and success in two different types of basic speech communication courses. The Speech Teacher, 20, 178–183 [CSA]
6. Calhoon, R. P., (1969). Niccolo Machiavelli and the twentieth century administrator. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 205–212 [CROSSREF][CSA]
7. Cherulnik, P. D., Way, J. H., Ames, S., & Hutto, D. B., (1981). Impressions of high and low Machiavellian men. Journal of Personality, 49, 388–400 [CROSSREF][CSA]
8. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L., (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
9. Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L., (1980). Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 47, 132–148 [CSA]
10. Cody, M. J., Woefel, M. L., & Jordan, W. J., (1983). Dimensions of compliance-gaining situations. Human Communication Research, 9, 99–113 [CROSSREF][CSA]
11. Deluga, R. J., (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 339–363 [CROSSREF][CSA]
12. DeTurk, M. A., (1985). A transactional analysis of compliance-gaining behavior: Effects of noncompliance, relational contexts, and actors' gender. Human Communication Research, 12, 54–78 [CROSSREF][CSA]
13. Dillard, J. P., & Burgoon, M., (1985). Situational influences on the selection of compliance-gaining messages: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52, 289–304 [CSA]
14. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H., (1959). The bases of social power. In D., Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
15. Geis, F. L., & Moon, T. H., (1981). Machiavellianism and deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 766–775 [CROSSREF][CSA]
16. Hirokawa, R. Y., Mickey, J., & Miura, S., (1991). Effects of request legitimacy on the compliance-gaining tactics of male and female managers. Communication Monographs, 58, 421–436 [CSA]
17. Johnson, G. M., (1992). Subordinate perceptions of superior's communication competence and task attraction related to superior's use of compliance-gaining tactics. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 54–67 [CSA]
18. Jones, E. E., (1964). Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century.
19. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C., (1985). Power in the classroom, III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34, 19–28 [CSA]
20. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I., (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452 [CROSSREF][CSA]
21. Machiavelli, N., (1513/1966). The prince and the discourses. New York: Bantam Books.
22. Marks, E., & Lindsay, C. A., (1966). Machiavellian attitudes: Some measurement and behavioral considerations. Sociometry, 29, 228–236 [INFOTRIEVE][CROSSREF][CSA]
23. Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., & Thweatt, K. S., (1998). Individuals' perceptions of their communication behavior: A validity study of the relationship between the cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale with aggressive communication traits. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 531–540 [CSA]
24. Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B., (1994). Development of a communication flexibility scale. Southern Communication Journal, 59, 171–178 [CSA]
25. Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R., (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30, 350–364 [CROSSREF][CSA]
26. McCroskey, J. C., (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65–72 [CSA]
27. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P., (1983). Power in the classroom, I: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175–184 [CSA]
28. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P., (1989). Bipolar scales. In P., Emmert & L. L., Barker (Eds.), Measurement of communication behavior (pp. 154–167). New York: Longman.
29. McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C., (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192–210 [INFOTRIEVE][CROSSREF][CSA]
30. McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A., (2003). Organizational behavior: Emerging realities for the workplace revolution. New York: McGraw Hill.
31. Mudrack, P. E., & Mason, E. S., (1995). Extending the Machiavellianism construct: A brief measure and some unexplored relationships. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 187–200 [CSA]
32. O'Hair, D., & Cody, M. J., (1987). Machiavellian beliefs and social influence. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 51, 279–303 [CSA]
33. O'Hair, D., Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L., (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication. Human Communication Research, 7, 325–339 [CROSSREF][CSA]
34. Pandey, J., & Rastogi, R., (1979). Machiavellianism and ingratiation. Journal of Social Psychology, 108, 221–225 [CSA]
35. Pandey, J., & Singh, P., (1986). Effects of Machiavellianism, other-enhancement, and power-position on affect, power feeling, and evaluation of the ingratiator. The Journal of Psychology, 121, 287–300 [CSA]
36. Richmond, V. P., (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195 [CSA]
37. Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C., (1984). Power in the classroom, II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125–136 [CSA]
38. Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C., (1990). Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure. Psychological Reports, 67, 449–450 [CROSSREF][CSA]
39. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. D., (2003). Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-reported nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 504–517 [CSA]
40. Ricks, J., & Fraedrich, J., (1999). The paradox of Machiavellianism: Machiavellianism may make for productive sales but poor management reviews. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 197–205 [CROSSREF][CSA]
41. Rim, Y., (1966). Machiavellianism and decisions involving risks. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 36–50 [CSA]
42. Roloff, M. E., & Barnicott, E. F., (1978). The situation use of pro- and antisocial compliance gaining strategies by high and low Machiavellians. In B. D., Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2 (pp. 193–205). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
43. Schultz, C. J., (1993). Situational and dispositional predictors of performance: A test of the hypothesized Machiavellianism X structure interaction among sales persons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 478–498 [CSA]
44. Sewell, W., & Hauser, R., (1975). Education, occupation, and earnings. New York: Academic Press.
45. Shea, M. T., & Beatty, J. R., (1983). Measuring Machiavellianism with Mach V: A psychometric investigation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 509–513 [PUBMED][INFOTRIEVE][CROSSREF][CSA]
46. Singer, J. E., (1964). The use of manipulative strategies: Machiavellianism and attractiveness. Sociometry, 27, 128–150 [CROSSREF][CSA]
47. Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R., (1995). Sex differences in ingratiatory behavior: An investigation of influence tactics in the salesperson-customer dyad. Journal of Business Research, 34, 35–45 [CROSSREF][CSA]
48. Teven, J. J., The relationship between teacher social influence behaviors and teacher effectiveness in the college classroom. Canyon, TX: Department of Communication, West Texas A&M University, forthcoming.
49. Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C., (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1–9 [CSA]
50. Turner, C., & Martinez, D., (1977). Social attainment, cognitive ability, and Machiavellianism. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.
51. Vleeming, R. G., (1979). Machiavellianism: A preliminary review. Psychological Reports, 44, 295–310 [CSA]
52. Walter, H. L., Anderson, C. M., & Martin, M. M., (2005). How subordinates' Machiavellianism and motives relate to satisfaction with superiors. Communication Quarterly, 53, 57–70 [CSA]
53. Wilson, D. S., Near, D. C., & Miller, R. R., (1998). Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitive strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 203–212 [CROSSREF][CSA]