PowerPoint in a new key

Communication Education

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 354-381

  Stoner, Mark R ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Codes; Inscriptional Systems; Logic; Metadiscourse; Pedagogy; PowerPoint

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547294347     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520701342052     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andrews, I. R. (1983). The practice of rhetorical criticism. New York: Macmillan.
2. Aristotle. (1984). The rhetoric and poetics of Aristotle (W. Rhys Roberts & I. Bywater, Trans.). New York: Random House. (Original work published in 1954)
3. Atkinson, C. (2004). PowerPoint usability: Q&A with Don Norman. Retrieved April 3, 2006, from http://www.sociablemedia.com/ articles_norman.htm
4. Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41, 77-86.
5. Byrne, D. (2003). Learning to love PowerPoint. Wired magazine, 11, 112-117.
6. Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (2001). Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education classrooms. Communication Education, 50, 230-240.
7. Cathcart, R. J. (1966). Post-Communication: Critical Analysis and Evaluation. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
8. Cramer, K. M., Collins, K. R., Snider, D., & Fawcett, G. (2007). The virtual lecture hall: Utilisation, effectiveness and student perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 106-115.
9. Downing, I., & Garmon, C. (2001). Teaching students in the basic course how to use presentation software. Communication Education, 50, 218-229.
10. Gaskins, R. (1986). Presenter Marketing Analysis. Retrieved June 6, 2007, from http://www.gbu wizards.com/files/gbu-presenter-vc-strategy-document-june- 1986.pdf
11. Gold, R. (2002). Reading PowerPoint. In N. Allen (Ed.), Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance. Westport, CT: Ablex.
12. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Gunduz, S. (2006). Comparing student understanding of quantum physics when embedding multimodal representations into two different writing formats: Presentation format versus summary report format. Science Education, 90, 1092-1112.
14. Jahandarie, K. (1999). Spoken and written discourse: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
15. Keefe, D. D., & Willett, J. D. (2004). A case for PowerPoint as a faculty authoring system. Cell Biology Education, 3, 156-158.
16. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., & Reid, E. (2005). English in urban classrooms: A multimodal perspective on teaching and learning, London: Routledge Falmer.
17. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. London: Continuum.
18. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
19. Kumpf, E. P. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9, 401-424.
20. Kunkel, K. R. (2004). A research note assessing the benefit of presentation software in two different lecture courses. Teaching Sociology, 32, 188-196.
21. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46-70.
22. Langer, S. K. (1959). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art (2nd ed). New York: The New American Library.
23. Lanius, C. (2004). PowerPoint, not your grandmother's presentations, but is it evil? Cell Biology Education, 3, 158-160.
24. Levasseur, D. G., Dean, K. W., & Pfaff, J. (2004). Speech pedagogy beyond the basics: A study of instructional methods in the advanced public speaking course. Communication Education, 53, 234-252.
25. Levasseur, D. G., & Sawyer, J. K. (2006). Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A research review of the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom. The Review of Communication, 6, 101-123.
26. Mantei, E. (2000). Using internet class notes and PowerPoint in the physical geology lecture. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 301-305.
27. Mason, R., & Hlynka, D. (1998). PowerPoint' in the classroom: Where's the power? Educational Technology, 38, 42-45.
28. McDonald, K. (2004). Examining PowerPointlessness. Cell Biology Education, 3, 160-161.
29. 2007 Microsoft Office Suites. Powerpoint 2007. [Computer software]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
30. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63, 81-97.
31. Nickerson, R. S. (1993). On the distribution of cognition: Some reflections. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 229-262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
33. O'Neil, J. (2005/2006). The relational aesthetics of PowerPoint: Affective/Not Effective Commu-nication. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 1, 85-91.
34. Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20, 167-182.
35. Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Quine, W. V. (1937). New foundations for mathematical logic. The American Mathematical Monthy, 44, 70-80.
37. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (1994). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 582-601). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
38. Salomon, G. (1994). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational researcher, 20, 2-9.
40. Seligman, J. (2001). Reasoning with diagrams. Retrieved February 8, 2007, from http:// www.arts.auckland.ac.nz/FileGet.cfm?ID=F4AOOBE6-10EB-4BC8- A828-B8EA9ED6F53A
41. Stoner, M., & Perkins, S. (2005). Making sense of messages: A critical apprenticeship in rhetorical criticism. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
42. Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint's power in the classroom: Enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers & Education, 45, 203-215.
43. Tufte, E. (2003a). PowerPoint is evil. Wired magazine, 11, 118-119.
44. Tufte, E. R (2003b). The cognitive style of PowerPoint: Pitching out corrupts within. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
45. Voss, D. (2004). PowerPoint in the classroom, is it really necessary? Cell Biology Education, 3, 155-156.