Let's make a deal: Quality and availability of second-stage information as a catalyst for change

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 248-272

  Howard, Jeffrey N ^a   Lambdin, Charles G ^a   Datteri, Darcee L ^a  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547287564     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546780600848049     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aaron, E., & Spivey, M. (1998). Frequency vs. probability formats: Framing the three doors problem. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 13-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
2. Bar-Hilel, M., & Falk, R. (1982). Some teasers concerning conditional probabilities. Cognition, 11, 109-122.
3. Bown, N.J., Read, D., & Summers, B. (2003). The lure of choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 297-308.
4. Burns, B. D., & Wieth, M. (2004). The collider principle in causal reasoning: Why the Monty Hall Dilemma is so hard. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 434-449.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
6. Falk, R. (1992). A closer look at the probabilities of the notorious three prisoners. Cognition, 43, 197-223.
7. Franco-Watkins, A. M., Derks, P. L., & Dougherty, M. R. P. (2003). Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem: Examining choice behaviour and probability judgements. Thinking and Reasoning, 9(1), 67-90.
8. Frazier, K. (1992). "Three Door" problem provokes letters, controversy. Skeptical Inquirer, 16, 192-199.
9. Friedman, D. (1998). Monty Hall's three doors: Construction and deconstruction of a choice anomaly. The American Economic Review, 88(4), 933-946.
10. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Goldstein, D. G., Gigerenzer, G., & the ABC Research Group (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Granberg, D. (1999). A new version of the Monty Hall Dilemma with unequal probabilities. Behavioural Processes, 48(1-2), 25-34.
13. Granberg, D., & Dorr, N. (1998). Further exploration of two-stage decision making in the Monty Hall dilemma. American Journal of Psychology, 111(4), 561-579.
14. Kraus, S., & Wang, X. T. (2003). The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 3-22.
15. Lindman, H. R. (1974). Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.
16. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805-824.
17. Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Inevitable illusions: How mistakes of reason rule our minds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18. Tubau, E., & Alonso, D. (2003). Overcoming illusory interferences in a probabilistic counterintuitive problem: The role of explicit representations. Memory and Cognition, 31(4), 596-607.