Pelvic rotations: A pelvic phantom study

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 650-657

  Foss, O A ^a,b   Klaksvik, J ^a   Benum, P ^a   Anda, S ^a  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NONE   (Norway)

Author keywords

Conventional radiography; Laboratory tests; Pelvis; Prosthesis; Skeletal, axial

Indexed keywords

BONE; CHARACTERIZATION; CORRELATION METHODS; JOINT PROSTHESES; JOINTS (ANATOMY); PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY; LABORATORY TESTS; LINEAR CORRELATIONS; PROSTHESIS; TILT TABLE;

RADIOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; PELVIC GIRDLE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROTATION;

HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PELVIC BONES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROTATION;

EID: 34547269789     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850701326941     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anda S, Svenningsen S, Grontvedt T, Benum P. Pelvic inclination and spatial orientation of the acetabulum - a radiographic, computed tomographic and clinical investigation. Acta Radiol 1990;31:389-94.
2. Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Lisle DA. Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy. Australas Radiol 1994;38:106-11.
3. Bowerman JW, Sena JM, Chang R. The teardrop shadow of the pelvis - anatomy and clinical significance. Radiology 1982;143:659-62.
4. Devane PA, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Hardie RM, Horne JG. Measurement of polyethylene wear in metal-backed acetabular cups. I. Three-dimensional technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;321:303-16.
5. Eddine TA, Migaud H, Chantelot C, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A. Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup. Surg Radiol Anat 2001;23: 105-10.
6. Fackler CD, Poss R. Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;153:169-78.
7. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Munuera L. Dislocation in low-friction arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1992;7:149-55.
8. Hassan DM, Johnston GHF, Dust WNC, Watson G, Dolovich AT. Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:80-4.
9. Herrlin K, Selvik G, Pettersson H. Space orientation of total hip prosthesis. A method for three-dimensional determination. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1986;27:619-27.
10. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Lund B, Soballe K, Kiaer T, Rovsing H, et al. Pelvic orientation and assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:721-9.
11. Katada SAK. A roentgenographic evaluation of the indices for hip dysplasia in children influenced by the pelvic tilt. In: Aniythys UR, editor. The hip: clinical studies and basic research. Amserdam: Elsevier Science, 1984:137-40.
12. Katz JF. Precise identification of radiographic acetabular landmarks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;145:166-8.
13. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:530-4.
14. Kojima A, Nakagawa T, Tohkura A. Simulation of acetabular coverage of femoral head using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117:330-6.
15. Krismer M, Bauer R, Tschupik J, Mayrhofer P. EBRA a method to measure migration of acetabular components. J Biomechanics 1995;28:1225-36.
16. Martell JM, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79A:1635-41.
17. McKibbin B. Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970;52:148-59.
18. Muller O, Lembeck B, Reize P, Wulker N. Quantification and visualization of the influence of pelvic tilt upon measurement of acetabular inclination and ante-version. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005;143:72-8.
19. Muramatsu Y, Tsuda Y, Nakamura Y, Kubo M, Takayama T, Hanai K. The development and use of a chest phantom for optimizing scanning techniques on a variety of low-dose helical computed tomography devices. J Comp Ass Tomogr 2003;27:364-74.
20. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:140-51.
21. Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz ME, et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty - a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:252-60.
22. Olivecrona L, Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP. Model studies on acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semiautomated program for volume merging. Acta Radiol 2003;44:419-29.
23. Plochocki JH. Directional bilateral asymmetry in human sacral morphology. Int J Osteoarch 2002;12:349-55.
24. Prapavat V, Runge W, Mans J, Krause A, Beuthan J, Muller G. Development of a finger joint phantom for the optical simulation of early stages of rheumatoid arthritis. Biomedizinische Technik 1997;42:319-26.
25. Ritter MA. Dislocation and subluxation of total hipreplacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;121:92-4.
26. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Radiol 1990;31:113-26.
27. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:241-8.
28. Tannast M, Langlotz U, Siebenrock KA, Wiese M, Bernsmann K, Langlotz F. Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:144-50.
29. Tonnis D. Normal values of hip-joint for evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;121:39-47.