Enlargement processes and distributional conflicts: The politics of discriminatory membership in the European Union

Public Choice

Volumn 132, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 85-102

  Schneider, Christina J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discriminatory membership; Enlargement; European Union; Transitional periods

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547239370     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-006-9135-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alberto, A., & Spolaore, E. (1997), On the number and size of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1027-1056
2. Alesina, A., Angeloni, I., & Etro, F. (2001). The Political Economy of International Unions. NBER Working Paper 8645.
3. Baldwin, R.E., Francois, J.F., & Portes, R. (1997). The costs and benefits of eastern enlargement The impact on the EU and Central Europe. Economic Policy, 12(24), 126-176.
4. Bernheim, D.B., Peleg, B., & Whinston, M.D. (1987a). Coalition-proof Nash equilibria I, Concepts, Journal of Economic Theory, 42(1), 1-12.
5. Bernheim, D.B., & Whinston, M.D. (1987b), Coalition-proof Nash equilibria II. Applications. Journal of Economic Theory, 42(1), 13-29.
6. Brams, S.J. (1975). Game theory and politics. New York: Free Press.
7. Brams, S.J., & Affuso, P. (1985). New Paradoxes of voting power on the EC Council of Ministers. Electoral Studies, 4, 135-139.
8. Braun, D. (2001), Intergovernmentale Beziehungen und Fiskalpolitik in Bundesstaaten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 42(4), 624-654.
9. Brou, D., & Ruta, M. (2004). A Positive Explanation of EU Enlargement. EUI Working Paper 2004(30).
10. Buchanan, J.M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economics, 32(125), 1-14.
11. European Parliament (1999). Livre Blanc Sur L'Largissement De L'Union Europénne. Volume II Rapport Sur Les Positions Des Etats Membres Et Des tats Candidats Sur Lelargissement De L' Union Europeenne. Luxembourg: European Parliament
12. Eurostat (2005). Statistical Indicators for EU Member States and Acceding States, http://www.eu-datashop.de/.
13. Holzinger, K. (2001). Optimal regulatory units. A concept of regional differentiation of environmental standards in the European Union. In K. Holzinger & P. Knöpfel (Eds.), Environmental policy in a European Union of variable geometry (pp. 65-107). Basel: Helbig and Lichtenhahn.
14. Hosli, M.O. (1993). Admission of European Free Trade Association States to the European Community: Effects on voting power in the European Community Council of Ministers. International Organization, 47, 629-643.
15. IMF. various years. Direction of trade statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary F'und.
16. Johnston, R.J. (1995). The conflict over qualified majority voting in the European Union Council of Ministers: An analysis of the UK negotiating stance using power indices. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 245-288.
17. Marshall, M.G., & Jaggers, K. (2003). Polity IV dataset version p4v2002e [Computer File]. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
18. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2002). Political economics. Explaining economic policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Plumper, T., Schneider, C.J., & Tröger, V.E. (2006). The politics of EU eastern enlargement Evidence from a Heckman selection model. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 17-38.
20. Roland, G., & Verdier, T. (2000). Law Enforcement and Transition. Unpublished Working Paper.
21. Ruta, M. (2005). Economic theories of political (dis)integration. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(1), 1-21.
22. Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55(1), 47-80.
23. Schimmelfennig, F. (2003). The EU, NATO and the integration of Europe: Rules und rhetoric. Cambridge: Campridge University Press.
24. Schneider, C.J. (2006). Differenzierte Mitgliedschaft und die EU-Osterweiterang: Das Beispiel der Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit. Swiss Political Science Review, 12(2), 67-99
25. Sjurson, H. (2002). Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in Ihe EU's enlargement policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(3), 491-513.
26. Stackelberg, H. von (1934). Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Vienna: Julius Springer.
27. Torreblanca, J. (2001). The reuniting of Europe: Promises, negotiations and compromises. Aldershot: Ashgate.
28. Treaty of Accession (n.d.). Temporary provisions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
29. Welfens, P.J.J. (1995). Die Europäische Union und die mitteleuropäischen Länder: Entwicklungen und wirtschaftspolitische Optionen. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 39, 22-31.
30. Widgren, M. (1994). Voting power in the EC decision-making and the consequences of two different enlargements. European Economic Review, 38, 1153-1170.
31. Yarbrough, B., & Yarbrough, R. (2001). Cooperation and governance in international trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.