A multiple-task measurement framework for assessing maximum-typical performance

Human Performance

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 241-258

  Mangos, Phillip M ^a   Steele Johnson, Debra ^b   Lahuis, David ^b   White III, Edward D ^c  

^a NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

^b WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Air Force Institute of Technology

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547229723     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08959280701333115     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arthur, W., Jr., Day, E. A., Bennett, W., Jr., McNeIIy, T. L., & Jordan, J. A. (1997). Dyadic versus individual training protocols: Loss and reacquisition of a complex skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 783-791.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
3. Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362-387.
4. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061-1071.
6. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C E. (1993). A theory of job performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
9. Diefendorff, J. M., Hall, R. J., Lord, R. G., & Strean, M. L. (2000). Action-state orientation: Construct validity of a revised measure and its relationship to work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 250-263.
10. DuBois, C L. Z., Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1993). Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: Definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 205-211.
11. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1997). Cognitive and developmental factors in expert performance. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp. 3-41). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
13. Gopher, D. (1996). Attention control: Explorations of the work of an executive controller. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 23-38.
14. Gopher, D., Weil, M., & Siegel, D. (1989) Practice under changing priorities: An approach to the training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 147-177.
15. Kirk, A. K., & Brown, D. F. (2003). Latent constructs of proximal and distal motivation predicting performance under maximum test conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 40-49.
16. Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., Weber, T. A., & Bardell, L. (1999). Training for executive control: Task coordination strategies and aging. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII (pp. 617-652). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Kuhl, J. ( 1994). A theory of action and state orientations. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 9-46). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
18. Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 610-621.
20. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
21. Mané, A., & Donchin, E. (1989). The Space Fortress game. Acta Psychologica, 71, 17-22.
22. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
23. Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, F. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482-486.
24. Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1993). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 263-331). New York: Macmillian.
25. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1990). Attentional requirements of automatic and controlled processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 67-82.
26. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.