Flight deck disturbance management: A simulator study of diagnosis and recovery from breakdowns in pilot-automation coordination

Human Factors

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 553-563

  Nikolic, Mark I ^a   Sarter, Nadine B ^b  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLIGHT DECK DISTURBANCE MANAGEMENT; PILOT ERROR MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES; PILOT-AUTOMATION COORDINATION;

AUTOMATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ERROR DETECTION; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; PERSONNEL TRAINING;

FLIGHT SIMULATORS;

AIRPLANE PILOT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLIGHT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AUTOMATION; AVIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34547215261     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X215647     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amalberti, R. (1996). La conduite des systèmes à risques [The control of high-risk systems]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
2. Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. (2006). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: Worldwide operations 1959-2005 (Aviation Safety, Boeing Commercial Airplanes). Seattle, WA: Author, Aviation Safety Division.
3. Bove, T., & Andersen, H. B. (2003). Validation of an error management taxonomy in ATC. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 3(1), 39-60.
4. Dekker, S. W. A. (2003). Illusions of explanation: A critical essay on error classification. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13(2), 95-106.
5. Helmreich, R. L., Klinect, J. R., & Wilhelm, J. A. (2001). System safety and threat and error management: The line operations safety audit (LOSA). In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1-6). Columbus: Ohio State University.
6. Hutchins, E. (1997). The integrated mode management interface (Final Rep. to contract NCC 2-591). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
7. Jacobsen, A., Chen, S., & Wiedemann, J. (2000). Vertical situation awareness display. Paper presented at the Royal Aeronautical Society's Situation Awareness on the Flight Deck: Avionics and Systems Miniconference held March 23 in London.
8. Jamieson, G., & Vicente, K. (2005). Designing effective human-automation-plant interfaces: A control-theoretic perspective. Human Factors, 47, 12-34.
9. Kanse, L., & Schaaf, T., van der. (2001). Recovery from failures in the chemical process industry. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 199-211.
10. Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2005). Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677-691.
11. Kontogiannis, T. (1997). A framework for the analysis of cognitive reliability in complex systems: A recovery centred approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 58, 233-248.
12. Kontogiannis, T. (1999). User strategies in recovering from errors in man-machine systems. Safety Science, 32, 49-68.
13. Mumaw, R. J., & Boorman, D. (2004). A new autoflight/FMS interface: Guiding design principles. In Proceedings of HCI-Aero 2004 [CD-ROM]. Toulouse, France: EURISCO International.
14. Mumaw, R. J., Salter, N., Wickens, C., Kimball, S., Nikolic, M., Marsh, R., et al. (2000). Analysis of pilots' monitoring and performance on highly automated flight decks (Final Project Rep.: NASA Ames Contract NAS2-99074). Seattle, WA: Boeing Commercial Aviation.
15. Naikar, N., & Saunders, A. (2003). Crossing the boundaries of safe operation: An approach for training technical skills in error management. Cognition, Technology and Work, 5, 171-180.
16. Nikolic, M. I., & Sarter, N. B. (2001). Peripheral visual feedback: A powerful means of supporting effective attention allocation in event-driven, data-rich environments. Human Factors, 43, 30-38.
17. Nikolic, M. I., & Sarter, N. B. (2003). Converging on error management: A review of current findings and future needs. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 513-517). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18. Norman, D. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1-55.
19. Norman, D. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Double-day.
20. Plat, M., & Amalberti, R. (2000). Experimental crew training to deal with automation surprises. In N. B. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 287-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Sarter, N. B., Mumaw, R., & Wickens, C. D. (2007). Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: An empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data. Human Factors, 49, 347-357.
23. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1997). Team play with a powerful and independent agent: Operational experiences and automation surprises on the Airbus A-320. Human Factors, 39, 553-569.
24. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (2000). Team play with a powerful and independent agent: A full-mission simulation study. Human Factors, 42, 390-402.
25. Sarter, N. B., Woods, D. D., & Billings, C. E. (1997). Automation surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed., pp. 1926-1943). New York: Wiley.
26. Schaaf, T. W., van der, & Kanse, L. (2000). Errors and error recovery. In P. F. Elzer, R. H. Kluwe, & B. Boussoffara (Eds.), Human error and system design and management (pp. 27-38). London: Springer-Verlag.
27. Sklar, A. E., & Sarter, N. B. (1999). "Good vibrations": The use of tactile feedback in support of mode awareness on advanced technology aircraft. Human Factors, 41, 543-552.
28. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In V. Patel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Wiener, E. L. (1993). Intervention strategies for the management of human error (NASA Contractor Rep. 4547). Moffett Field, CA: Ames Research Center.
30. Wioland, L., & Amalberti, R. (1998). Human error management: Towards an ecological safety model. A case study in an air traffic control microworld. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 13-19). Le Chesnay, France: European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics (EACE) Press.
31. Woods, D. D. (1984). Some results on operator performance in emergency events. In Institute of Chemical Engineers (Author), D. Whitfield (Ed.), Ergonomic problems in process operations. Symposium Series (pp. 21-31). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
32. Woods, D. D. (1988). Coping with complexity: The psychology of human behavior in complex systems. In L. P. Goodstein, H. B. Andersen, & S. E. Olsen (Eds.), Tasks, errors, and mental models (pp. 128-148). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
33. Woods, D. D. (1993). Process-tracing methods for the study of cognition outside of the experimental psychology laboratory. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 228-251). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Woods, D. D. (1994). Cognitive demands and activities in dynamic fault management: Abductive reasoning and disturbance management. In N. A. Stanton (Ed.), Human factors of alarm design (pp. 63-92). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
35. Woods, D. D., Johannesen, L. J., Cook, R. I., & Sarter, N. B. (1994). Behind human error: Cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: CSERIAC.
36. Woods, D. D., Wise, J. A., & Hanes, L. F. (1981). An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 110-114). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
37. Zapf, D., & Reason, J. T. (1994). Human errors and error handling. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 427-432.