Does target viewing time influence perceived reachability?

International Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1331-1339

  Gabbard, Carl ^a   Ammar, Diala ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Imagined movements; Motor imagery; Perceived reachability; Reaching

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTING RESPONSE; PERCEPTION; REACHING; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WORKPLACE;

EID: 34547213680     PISSN: 00207454     EISSN: 15635279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207450600936809     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Carello, C., Grosofsky, A., Reichel, F. D., Soloan, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1989). Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology, 1, 27-54.
2. Coren, S. (1993). The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and eardness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 1-3.
3. Decety, J. (1996). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 45-52.
4. Fischer, M. H. (2005). Perceived reachability: The role of handedness and hemifield. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 283-289.
5. Gabbard, C., Ammar, D., & Rodrigues, L. (2005a). Handedness effects on mentally simulated reaching. Human Movement Science, 24(4), 484-495.
6. Gabbard, C., Ammar, D., & Rodrigues, L. (2005b). Perceived reach in hemispace. Brain and Cognition, 58(2), 172-177.
7. Gabbard, C., Ammar, D., & Rodrigues, L. (2005c). Visual cues and perceived reachability. Brain and Cognition, 59(3), 287-291.
8. Gentilluci, M., Roy, A. C., & Stefanini, S. (2004). Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: Are these tasks guided by a common motor representation Experimental Brain Research, 157(4), 496-506.
9. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Glover, S., Dixon, P., Castiello, U., & Rushworth, M. F. (2005). Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 496-506.
11. Heft, H. (1993). A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: Distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Psychology, 5, 256-271.
12. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioural Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
13. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103-S109.
14. Johnson, S., Corballis, P., & Gazzaniga, M. (2001). Within grasp but out of reach: Evidence for a double dissociation between imagined hand and arm movements in the left cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 39, 36-50.
15. Mark, L. S., Nemeth, K., Gardner, D., Dainoff, M. J., Duffy, M., & Grandt, K. (1997). Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1365-1379.
16. Robinovitch, S. N. (1998). Perception of postural limits during reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(4), 352-358.
17. Rochat, P., & Wraga, M. (1997). An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1), 199-212.
18. Sabate, M., Gonzales, B., & Rodriquez, M. (2004). Brain lateralization of motor imagery: Motor planning asymmetry as a cause of movement lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1041-1049.
19. Sheng, L., Latash, M. L., & Zatsiorsky, V. M. (2004). Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 273-280.
20. Stinear, C. M., Byblow, W. D., Steyvers, M., Levin, O., & Swinnen, S. P. (2006). Kinesthetic, but not visual imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 157-164.