Constrained maneuvering: Rhetoric as a rational enterprise

Argumentation

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 447-466

  Tindale, Christopher W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audience; Olbrechts Tyteca; Perelman; Pragma dialectics; Rhetorical argumentation; Rhetorical features; Strategic maneuvering

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547208596     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9026-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aristotle: 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. J. Barnes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Bakhtin, M.: 1981, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, C. Emerson & M. Holquist (trans.), in M. Holquist (ed.), University of Austin Press, Austin.
3. Bakhtin, M.: 1986, Speech Genres & Other Later Essays, C. Emerson & M. Holquist (trans.), in V. W. McGee (ed.), University of Texas Press, Austin.
4. Crosswhite, James: 1996, The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
5. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1995, 'Perelman and the Fallacies', Philosophy and Rhetoric 28, 122-133.
6. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 1999a, 'Delivering the Goods in a Critical Discussion', in F. H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 163-168, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
7. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 1999b, 'William the Silent's Argumentative Discourse', in F. H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 168-172, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
8. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 1999c, 'Strategic Manoeuvering in Argumentative Discourse', Discourse Studies 1(4), 479-497.
9. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2000a, 'Rhetoric in Pragma-Dialectics'. Argumentation, Interpretation, Rhetoric, 1. Retrieved from www.argumentation.spb.ru/ 2000_1/index.htm
10. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2000b, 'Rhetorical Analysis within a PragmaDialectical Framework: The Case of R. J. Reynolds', Argumentation 14, 293-305.
11. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2001, 'Clear Thinking in Troubled Times: An Integrated Pragma-Dialectical Analysis', Informal Logic 21(2), 17-30.
12. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2002a, 'Strategic Manoeuvering with the Burden of Proof', in F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, pp. 13-29, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
13. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2002b, 'Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance', in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, pp. 131-59, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL.
14. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2003, 'More About Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of the Tu Quoque', in J. A. Blair et al. (eds.), Informal Logic @25. 12pp.
15. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2005, Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity', in D. Hitchcock (ed.), The uses of argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, pp. 75-84, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, Hamilton, ON.
16. Fahnestock, J.: 1999, Rhetorical Figures in Science, Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Foss, S. K. and C. L. Griffin: 1995, 'Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric', Communication Monographs 62, 2-18.
18. Gross, A. and R. Dearin: 2003, Chaim Perelman, State University of New York Press, Albany.
19. Johnson, R. H.: 2000, Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
20. Kennedy, G.: 1991, Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
21. Levi, D.: 2000, In Defense of Informal Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL.
22. McCabe, M. M.: 1994, 'Arguments in Context: Aristotle's Defense of Rhetoric', in D. J. Furley and A. Nehamas (eds.), Aristotle's, Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, pp. 129-165, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
23. Perelman, C.: 1989, The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians: Remembrances and Comments', in R. D. Dearin (ed.), The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response, pp. 239-251, University Press of America, New York.
24. Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation, J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver (Irans.), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
25. Pinto, R. C.: 2001, Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic with an Introduction by Hans V. Hansen, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL.
26. Plato: 1997, Complete Works. Ed. J. M. Cooper, Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.
27. Reboul, O.: 1989, 'The Figure and the Argument', in M. Meyer (ed.), From Metaphysics to Rhetoric, pp. 169-181, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Holland.
28. van Rees, M. A.: 2002, 'Argumentative Functions of Dissociation in Every-day Discussions', in H. V. Hansen et al. (eds.), Argumentation and Its Applications, pp. 14, OSSA, Windsor.
29. van Rees, M. A.: 2005, 'Indications of Dissociation', in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Argumentation in Practice, pp. 53-67, John Benjamins Publishing Co, Amsterdam.
30. Schiappa, E.: 2003, Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning, Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale, IL.
31. Tindale, C. W.: 1999, Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argumentation, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
32. Tindale, C. W.: 2004, Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Toulmin, S.: 2001, Return to Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.