The continued usage of business e-learning courses in Hong Kong corporations

Education and Information Technologies

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 175-188

  Yeung, Paul ^a,b   Jordan, Ernest ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b 8/F VTC Tower ^*  (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Consumer behavior; Continued IT usage; e learning; Postadoption behavior; Survey research; Technology acceptance; User satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547178334     PISSN: 13602357     EISSN: 15737608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-007-9042-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alter, S. (1999). A general, yet useful theory of information systems (Vol 1, pp. 1-70) Atlanta, GA, USA: Association for Information Systems.
2. ASTD (2001). A vision of e-learning for America's workforce. Developed by American Society of Training and Development (ASTD) and the National Governors Associations (NGA). Retrieved October 14, 2002, from http://www.nga.org/Files/ pdf/ELEARNINGREPORT.pdf.
3. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
4. Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309-334.
5. CIPD (2002). How do people learn? In J. Reynolds, L. Caley & R. Mason (Eds.) Research report. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
6. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
7. Cross, J., & Hamilton, I. (2002). The DNA of eLearning, excerpt from beyond eLearning, Internet Time Group. Retrieved July 7, 2005, from http://www.internettime.com/beyond.
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
9. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
11. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
12. Fornell, C. (1982). A second generation of multivariate analysis. New York: Praeger.
13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
14. Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out. Workforce, 80, 53-60, (October).
15. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Hong S. J., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2005). Understanding continued IT usage: An extension to the expectation-confirmation model in IT domain. In C. P. Wei & B. Yen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Pacific-Asia conference on information system 2005 (pp. 1267-1280).
17. Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information & Management, 29(5), 227-238.
18. Jasperson, J, Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525-557.
19. Jöreskog, K. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Retrieved August 15, 2005, from http://www.ssicentral. com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf.
20. Levine, D. M., Berenson, M. L., & Stephen, D. (1999). Statistics for managers (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
21. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
22. Moshinskie, J. (2002). How to keep e-learners from e-escaping. In A. Rosette (Ed.), The ASTD e-learning handbook (pp. 218-233). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Rothwell, W. (2002). The workplace learner: How to align training initiatives with individual learning competencies. New York: AMACOM.
24. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253.
25. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W. Y., & Tam K. Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(3), 215-242.
26. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.
27. Yeung, P. (2006). Understanding the continued usage of business e-learning courses in HK Corporations (D.B.A. thesis). Australia: Macquarie University.
28. Yeung, P., & Jordan, E. (2006). Understanding the continued usage of business e-learning courses in HK corporations. In D. Kumar & J. Turner (Eds.), International federation for information processing, volume 210, education for the 21st century-impact of ICT and digital resources, WCC 2006 Santiago, Chile (pp. 245-254). Boston: Springer.
29. Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146-169.
30. Yu, J., & Cooper, H. (1983). A qualitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 36-44.