Mimicry on the edge: Why do mimics vary in resemblance to their model in different parts of their geographical range?

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 274, Issue 1621, 2007, Pages 1955-1961

  Harper Jr , George R ^a,b   Pfennig, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b HENDRIX COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Batesian mimicry; Geographical variation; Lampropeltis triangulum elapsoides; Micrurus fulvius; Predation

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; MIMICRY; NATURAL SELECTION; SNAKE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION (SPECIES); NONHUMAN; PREDATION; PREY SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

LAMPROPELTIS TRIANGULUM ELAPSOIDES; MICRURUS FULVIUS;

EID: 34547161394     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0558     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alapegiron, A., Lomonte, B., Gustafsson, B., Dasilva, N. J. & Thelestam, M. 1994 Electrophoretic and immunochemical studies of Micrurus snake venoms. Toxicon 32, 713-723.
2. Bates, H. W. 1862 Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23, 495-566.
3. Brodie III, E. D. & Brodie Jr, E. D. 2004 Venomous snake mimicry. In The venomous reptiles of the western hemisphere, vol. II (eds J. A. Campbell & W. W. Lamar), pp. 617-633. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates.
4. Brodie III, E. D. & Janzen, F. J. 1995 Experimental studies of coral snake mimicry: generalized avoidance of ringed snake patterns by free-ranging avian predators. Funct. Ecol. 9, 186-190. (doi:10.2307/2390563)
5. Brower, L. P. & Brower, J. V. Z. 1962 The relative abundance of model and mimic butterflies in natural populations of the Battusphilenor mimicry complex. Ecology 43, 154-158.
6. Caley, M. J. & Schluter, D. 2003 Predators favour mimicry in a tropical reef fish. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 667-672. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2263)
7. Chippaux, J. P., Williams, V. & White, J. 1991 Snake venom variability: methods of study, results and interpretation. Toxicon 29, 1279-1303. (doi:10.1016/0041-0101(91)90116-9)
8. Darst, C. R. & Cummings, M. E. 2006 Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs. Nature 440, 208-211. (doi:10.1038/nature04297)
9. Edmunds, M. 1974 Defense in animals. A survey of anti-predator defenses. London, UK: Longmans.
10. Edmunds, M. 2000 Why are there good and poor mimics? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70, 459-466. (doi:10.1006/bijl.1999.0425)
11. Endler, J. A. 1991 Interactions between predators and prey. In Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach (eds J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 169-196. London, UK: Blackwell.
12. Fisher, R. A. 1999 The genetical theory of natural selection. A complete variorum edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13. Gavrilets, S. & Hastings, A. 1988 Coevolutionary chase in two species systems with applications to mimicry. J. Theor. Biol. 191, 415-427. (doi:10.1006/jtbi.1997.0615)
14. Getty, T. 1985 Discriminability and the sigmoid functional response: how optimal foragers could stabilize model-mimic complexes. Am. Nat. 125, 239-256. (doi:10.1086/284339)
15. Greene, H. W. & McDiarmid, R. Y. 1981 Coral snake mimicry: does it occur? Science 213, 1207-1212. (doi:10.1126/science.213.4513.1207)
16. Harper, G. R. J. 2006 Evolution of a snake mimicry complex. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
17. Holmgren, N. M. A. & Enquist, M. 1999 Dynamics of mimicry evolution. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 66, 145-158. (doi:10.1006/bijl.1998.0269)
18. Huheey, J. E. 1964 Studies of warning coloration and mimicry. IV. A mathematical model of model-mimic frequencies. Ecology 45, 185-188. (doi:10.2307/1937125)
19. Mallet, J. & Joron, M. 1999 Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 201-233. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.201)
20. Oaten, A., Pearce, C. E. M. & Smyth, M. E. B. 1975 Batesian mimicry and signal detection theory. Bull. Math. Biol. 37, 367-387.
21. Palmer, W. M. & Braswell, A. L. 1995 Reptiles of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
22. Pfennig, D. W., Harcombe, W. R. & Pfennig, K. S. 2001 Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Nature 410, 323. (doi:10.1038/35066628)
23. Pfennig, D. W., Harper, G. R. J., Brumo, A. F., Harcombe, W. R. & Pfennig, K. S. 2007 Population differences in predation on Batesian mimics in allopatry with their model: selection against mimics is strongest when they are common. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 505-511. (doi:10.1007/s00265- 006-0278-x)
24. Pough, F. H. 1988 Mimicry in vertebrates: are the rules different? Am. Nat. 131, S67-S102. (doi:10.1086/284767)
25. Roze, J. A. 1996 Coral snakes of the Americas: biology, identification, and venoms. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
26. Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N. & Speed, M. P. 2004 Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Sherratt, T. N. 2002 The evolution of imperfect mimicry. Behav. Ecol. 13, 821-826. (doi:10.1093/beheco/13.6.821)
28. Wickler, W. 1968 Mimicry in plants and animals. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.