Dynamics of mimicry evolution

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 145-158

  Holmgren, Noél M A ^a,b   Enquist, Magnus ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Batesian mimicry; Communication; Imitation; Signalling

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; MIMICRY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 0033065033     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/bijl.1998.0269     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bates HW. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 23: 495-566.
2. Benson WW. 1972. Natural selection for Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica. Science 176: 936-939.
3. Brower JVZ. 1958a. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Part I. The monarch Danaus plexippus, and the viceroy, Limenitis archippus archippus. Evolution 12: 32-47.
4. Brower JVZ. 1958b. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Part II. Ballus philenor and Papilio troilus, P. polyxenes and P. glaucus. Evolution 12: 123-136.
5. Brower JVZ. 1958c. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Part III. Danaus gilippus bernice and Limenitis archippus floridensis. Evolution 12: 273-285.
6. Dafni A. 1987. Pollination in Orchis and related genera: Evolution from rewards to deception. In: Arditti J, ed. Orchid Biology, Reviews and Perspectives Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 80-104.
7. Dawkins MS, Guilford, T. 1995. An exaggerated preference for simple neural network models of signal evolution? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B261: 357-360.
8. Dittrich W, Gilbert F, Green P, McGregor P, Grewcock D. 1993. Imperfect mimicry: a pigeon's perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B251: 195-200.
9. Dixey FA. 1897. Mimetic attraction. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1897: 317-332.
10. Dixey FA. 1909. On Müllenan mimicry and diaposematism. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1909: 559-583.
11. Enquist M, Arak A. 1993. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses, Nature 361:446-448.
12. Enquist M, Arak A. 1998. Neural representation and the evolution of signal form In: Dukas R. ed. Cognitive ecology Chicago: Chicago University Press.
13. Fisher RA. 1927. On some objections to mimicry theory; statistical and genetic. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1927: 269-278.
14. Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Ford EB. 1963. Mimicry. Proceeding of the XVI International Congress of Zoology, 184-186.
16. Ghirlanda S, Enquist M. 1998. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control. Animal Behaviour (in press).
17. Haykin S. 1994. Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation. New York: MacMillan College Publishing Company.
18. Hinde RA. 1970. Animal behaviour: a synthesis of ethology and comperative psychology. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogukusha.
19. Kamo M, Kubo T, Iwasa Y. 1998. Neural network for female mate preference, trained by a genetic algorithm. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London B353: 399-406.
20. Lloyd JE. 1965. Aggressive mimicry in Photuris: firefly femmes fatales. Science 149: 653-654.
21. Mackintosh NJ. 1974. The psychology animal learning. London: Academic Press.
22. Maki WS, Abunawass AM. 1991. A connectionist approach to conditional discriminations: Learning, short-term memory, and attention. In: Commons ML, Grossberg S, Staddon JER, eds. Neural network models of conditioning and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum, 241-278.
23. Marshall GAK. 1908. On diaposematism, with reference to some limitations of the Müllerian hypothesis of mimicry. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1908: 93-142.
24. Müller F. 1879. Ituna and Thyridis; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1879: xx-xxix.
25. Nicholson AJ. 1927. A new theory of mimicry in insects. Austral. Zoology 5: 10-10.
26. Nur U. 1970. Evolutionary rates of models and mimics in Batesian mimicry. American Naturalist 104: 477-486.
27. Pearce JM. 1994. Similarity and discrimiation: a selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review 101: 587-607.
28. Poulton EB. 1898. Natural selection: the cause of mimetic resemblance and common warning colours. Linnean Society Journal of Zoology 26: 558-612.
29. Rilling M. 1977. Stimulus control and inhibitory process In: Honig WK, Staddon JER, eds. Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 432-480.
30. Shepard RN. 1987. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237: 1317-1323.
31. Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, Brown KS, Benson WW, Singer MC. 1985. Genetics and the evolution of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London 308: 433-613.
32. Turner JRG. 1977. Butterfly mimicry: the genetical evolution of an adaptation. In: Hecht MK, Steere WC, Wallace B, eds. Evolutionary Biology New York: Plenum Press, 163-206.
33. Turner JRG. 1981. Adaptation and the evolution in Heliconius: a defence of nco-Darwinism. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 99-121.
34. Turner JRG. 1987. The evolutionary dynamics of Batesian and Muellerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecol. Entomology 12: 81-95.
35. Turner JRG, Speed MP. 1996. Learning and memory in mimicry. I. Simulations of laboratory experiments. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London B351: 1157-1170.
36. Wallace AR. 1866. On the phenomena of variation and geographical distribution, as illustrated by the Papilionidac of the Malayan region. Transactions Linnean Society of London 25: 1-72.