Classification of Usability Problems (CUP) scheme: Augmentation and exploitation

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 189, Issue , 2006, Pages 281-290

  Vilbergsdóttir, Sigurbjörg Gróa ^a   Hvannberg, Ebba Thora ^a   Law, Effie Lai Chong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Defect classification; Reliability; Think aloud; Usability; User test; Validity

Indexed keywords

PROBLEM SOLVING; RELIABILITY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

DEFECT CLASSIFICATION; USER TEST;

SOFTWARE TESTING;

EID: 34547153764     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1182475.1182505     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Altman, D., Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, 1991.
2. Andre, T.S., Hartson, H.R., Belz, S.M. and McCreary, F.A., The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools. Int. J. HumanComputer Studies 54, (2001), 107-136.
3. Card, D., Learning from our mistakes with Defect Cause Analysis. IEEE Software Jan/Feb, (1998), 56-63.
4. Chillarege, R., Bhandari, I.S., Chaar, J.K., Halliday, M.J., Moebus, D.S., Ray, B.K. and Wong, M., Orthogonal Defect Classification - A Concept for InProcess Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18, 11 (1992), 943-956.
5. Constantine, L.L. and Lockwood, L.A.D., Software for use. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1999.
6. Davis, F.D., Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319-340.
7. El Emam, K., Benchmarking Kappa: Interrater Agreement in Software Process Assessments. Empirical Software Engineering 4, (1999), 113-133.
8. Fleiss, J.L., Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76, (1971), 378-382.
9. Freimut, B. Developing and using defect classification schemes; Fraunhofer: 2001.
10. Grady, R., Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement. Prentice Hall, 1992.
11. Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., Persson, J., Hektor, A. and Herulf, L., Making a difference - a survey of the usability profession in Sweden. In NordiCHI, ACM: Tampere, Finland, 2004.
12. Hudson, W., Toward Unified Models in User-Centered and Object-Oriented Design. In Object Modeling and User Interface Design, van Harmelen, M., Ed. Addison-Wesley: New Jersey, 2001; pp 313-362.
13. 13.Hvannberg, E.T. and Law, E.L.-C. Classification of Usability Problems (CUP) Scheme, In Interact, (2003), 655-662.
14. King, J.E. Microsoft Excel templates for calculating a generalized kappa statistic. http://www.ccit.bcm.tmc.edu/jking/homepage/.
15. King, J.E., Software solutions for obtaining a kappatype statistic for use with multiple raters. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Dallas, TX, 2004.
16. Lezak, M., Perry, D.E. and Stell, D. A case study in root cause defect analysis, In Proc. of ICSE, (2000), 428-437.
17. Mays, R.G., Jones, C.L., Holloway, G.J. and Studinski, D.P., Experiences with defect prevention. IBM Systems Journal 29, 1 (1990), 4-32.
18. 18.Moody, D.L., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T. and Sølvberg, A. Evaluating the quality of information models: empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework, In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering,IEEE Computer Society (2003), 295-305.
19. QSR International Pty Ltd. N6. http://www.qsr.com.au/products/ productoverview/N6.htm.
20. Siegel, S. and Castellan, N.J., Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1988.
21. TechSmith Camtasia Studio Screen Recording Software: 2005.
22. van Harmelen, M., Designing with Idiom. In Object Modeling and User Interface Design, Addison-Wesley: New Jersey, 2001; pp 71-113.