The structure of program evaluation: An approach for evaluating a course, clerkship, or components of a residency or fellowship training program

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 308-318

  Durning, Steven J ^a,b   Hemmer, Paul ^a   Pangaro, Louis N ^a  

^a Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447566281     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10401330701366796     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education, Common Program Requirements, Section VII. C. 2. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/DutyHours/ dutyHoursCommonPR.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2006.
2. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree. Accessed June 2006. Available at: http://www.lcme.org/ functions2006june.pdf
3. Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association 1988;260:1743-8.
4. Stufflebeam DL. CIPP evaluation model checklist. The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, 2002. Available at: http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/ checklists/cippchecklist.htm#bibliography
5. Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP model for program evaluation. In GF Madaus, M Scriven, DL Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 117-41). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1983.
6. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: A method for assessing clinical skills. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003;138:476-81.
7. Durning S, Cation L, Markert R, Pangaro L. Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-CEX in residency training. Academic Medicine 2002;77:50-4.
8. Musick DW. A conceptual model for program evaluation in graduate medical education. Academic Medicine 2006;81:759-65.
9. Kassebaum DG. The measurement of outcomes in the assessment of educational program effectiveness. Academic Medicine 1990;65:293-6.
10. Holmboe ES, Rodak W, Mills G, McFarlane MJ, Schultz HJ. Outcomes-based evaluation in resident education: Creating systems and structured portfolios. American Journal of Medicine 2006;708-14.
11. Gage NL. Hard gains in the soft sciences. Bloomington, IN: CEDR, Phi Delta Kappa, 1985.
12. Durning S, Pangaro L, Denton GD, et al. Inter-site consistency as a measurement of programmatic evaluation. Academic Medicine 2003:78:536-8.
13. Roop SA, Pangaro L. Effect of clinical teaching on student performance during a medicine clerkship. American Journal of Medicine 2001;110:205-10.
14. Cox S, DaRosa DA, Margo K, Morgenstern BZ, Pangaro LN, Sieries FA. Chapter 7: Evaluation of the clerkship: Clinical teachers and program. In RME Fincher (Ed.), Guidebook for clerkship directors (3rd ed.). Omaha, NE: Alliance for Clinical Education, 2005. pp. 251-291.
15. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education 2005;39:309-17.
16. Hejduk G, Kahn N, Ostergaard D. Twenty years of consulting excellence: The residency assistance program. Family Medicine 1997;29:696-700.
17. Colliver JA. Call for greater emphasis on effect-size measures in published articles in Teaching and Learning in Medicine. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2002;14:206-10.