New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 1706-1713

  Lafage, Virginie ^a   Gangnet, Nicolas ^b   Sénégas, Jacques ^c   Lavaste, François ^a   Skalli, Wafa ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

^b BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Centre Aquitain du Dos   (France)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Destabilized spine; Finite element model; Interspinous instrumentation; Lumbar spine

Indexed keywords

POLYESTER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE INJURY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; ARTHRODESIS; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 34447558123     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180b9f429     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Nachemson A. Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain. Int Orthop 1985;9:1-10.
2. Ebara S, Harada T, Hosono N, et al. Intraoperative measurement of lumbar spinal instability. Spine 1992;17(suppl):44 -50.
3. Mimura M, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, et al. Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 1994;19:1371-80.
4. Adams MA. Biomechanics of spinal implants. In: Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Spengler DM, et al, eds. Instrumented Fusion of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: State of the Art, Questions, and Controversies. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
5. Cavagna R, Antonietti P, Gagna G. Analyse des 112 premiers cas traités par instrumentation vertébrale postérieure semi rigide. Rachis 1995;7:283-93.
6. Etebar S, Cahill DW. Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 1999;90:163-9.
7. Kleiner JB, Odom JA Jr, Moore MR, et al. The effect of instrumentation on human spinal fusion mass. Spine 1995;20:90-7.
8. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004;29:1938-44.
9. Strempel A, Muelenaere P, Dutoit G. The effect of spinal implants on implants failure: a prospective multicenter study with minimum follow up of 2 years [poster 109]. European Spine Society Meeting, 1997.
10. Qi-Bin B, Hansen AY. Prosthetic disc replacement: the future? Clin Orthop 2002;394:139-45.
11. Bertagnoli R. Review of modern treatment options for degenerative disc disease. In: Kaech DL, Jinkins JR, eds. Spinal Restabilization Procedures. Paris: Elsevier Science; 2002:365-75.
12. Grevitt MP, Gardner AD, Spilsbury J, et al. The Graf stabilisation system: early results in 50 patients. Eur Spine J 1995;4:169-75; discussion 35.
13. Freudiger S, Dubois G, Lorrain M. Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:127-32.
14. Bernard P. L'instabilité lombaire et son traitement par ligamentoplastie postérieure avec cale [Medical Thesis no. 3089]. Bordeaux, France, 1994.
15. Cohen R. Traitement des instabilités lombaires dégénératives L4-L5 par ligamentoplastie interépineuse [Medical thesis]. Montpellier, France, 1992.
16. Laudet CG, Elberg J-F, Robine D. Comportement biomécanique d'un ressort inter-apophysaire vertébral postérieur analyse expérimentale du comportement discal en compression et en flexion/extension. Rachis 1993;5.
17. Minns RJ, Walsh WK. Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. Spine 1997;22:1819-25; discussion 1826-7.
18. Samani J. The interspinous U. In: Biomechanics: Operating Technique-Indications. Japan, 1996.
19. Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):164 -9.
20. Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, et al. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine 2003;28:26-32.
21. Voydeville G. Etude biomécanique d'une unité spinale L4/L5 saine, lésée puis stabilisée par une cale et un ligament. Paris: Gieda Rachis; 1994.
22. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, et al. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 2005;30:324-31.
23. Rigby MC, Selmon GP, Foy MA, et al. Graf ligament stabilisation: mid- to long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 2001;10:234-6.
24. Jadhav AL, Wardlaw D, Porter RW, et al. Retrospective study of a new technique for soft stabilisation of the lumbar spine. European Spine Society Meeting, 1997.
25. Leahy JC, Mathias KJ, Heaton A, et al. Design of spinous process hooks for flexible fixation of the lumbar spine. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2000;214:479-87.
26. Leahy JC, Mathias KJ, Hukins DW, et al. Mechanical testing of a flexible fixation device for the lumbar spine. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2000;214:489-95.
27. Papp T, Porter RW, Aspden RM, et al. An in vitro study of the biomechanical effects of flexible stabilization on the lumbar spine. Spine 1997;22:151-5.
28. Sénégas J, Vital JM, Guerin J, et al. Stabilisation Lombaire Souple, Instabilité Vertebrales Lombaires. Expansion Scientifique Française 1997;124-32.
29. Shepherd DE, Leahy JC, Hukins DW, et al. Slippage of a spinous process hook during flexion in a flexible fixation system for the lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys 2001;23:135-41.
30. Lavaste F, Asselineau A, Diop A, et al. Experimental procedure for mechanical evaluation of dorso-lumbar segments and osteosynthesis devices. Rachis 1990;2:435-46.
31. Lavaste F, Skalli W, Robin S, et al. Three-dimensional geometrical and mechanical modelling of the lumbar spine. J Biomech 1992;25:1153-64.
32. Skaggs DL, Weidenbaum M, Iatridis JC, et al. Regional variation in tensile properties and biochemical composition of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 1994;19:1310-9.
33. Semaan I, Skalli W, Véron S, et al. Anatomie Quantitative Tridimensionnelle du Rachis Lombaire. Rev Chirurg Orthop 2001;87:340-53.
34. Gangnet N, Pomero V, Dumas R, et al. Variability of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity line: a three-dimensional stereoradiographic study using a force platform. Surg Radiol Anat 2003;25:424-33.
35. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
36. Panjabi MM. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework. Spine 1988;13:1129-34.
37. Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes LE. Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 1998;7:148-54.
38. Kaigle AM, Holm SH, Hansson TH. 1997 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies. Kinematic behavior of the porcine lumbar spine: a chronic lesion model. Spine 1997;22:2796-806.
39. Pope MH, Goel VK, Sumner DR, et al. Biomechanics introduction. 1995 Focus Issue Meeting on Fusion. Spine 1995;20(suppl):84.
40. Roughley PJ. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine 2004;29:2691-9.
41. Holm S. Pathophysiology of disc degeneration. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993;251:13-5.
42. Unglaub F, Lorenz H, Nerlich A, et al. [Stimulation of degenerative changes in the intervertebral disc through axial compression: radiologic, histologic and biomechanical research in an animal model]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003;141:412-7.
43. Kroeber M, Unglaub F, Guegring T, et al. Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs: an in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Spine 2005;30:181-7.