Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 350-361

  Most, Tova ^a   Peled, Miriam ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 34447556780     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enm012     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Adi-Bensaid, L., & Bat-El, O. (2004). The development of the prosodic word in the speech of a hearing-impaired child with a cochlear implant device. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 2, 187-206.
2. Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., Paatsch, L. E., Barry, J. G., Bow, C. P., Wales, R. J., et al. (2001). Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 44, 264-285.
3. Boothroyd, A. (1982). Hearing impairment in young children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Boothroyd, A. (1984). Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 27, 134-144.
5. Boothroyd, A. (1988). Perception of speech pattern contrasts from auditory presentation of voice fundamental frequency. Ear & Hearing, 9, 313-321.
6. Boothroyd, A., & Eran, O. (1994). Auditory speech perception capacity of child implant users expressed as equivalent hearing loss. Volta Review, 96(5), 151-168.
7. Borden, G. J., Harris, K. S., & Raphael, L. J. (1994). Speech science primer (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
8. Carney, A. E., Kienle, M., & Miyamoto, R. C. (1990). Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: A comparison with a single-channel tactile device. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 33, 229-237.
9. Cohen-Licht, D., & Most, T. (2000). The contribution of speech envelope to the perception of intonation by hearing and hearing impaired individuals. Unpublished master's thesis, School of Education, Tel-Aviv University. (Hebrew).
10. Dowell, R. C., Dettman, S. J., Hill, K., Winton, E., Barker, E. J., & Clark, G. M. (2002). Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear implants: Older is not always poorer. Annual Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 111, 97-101.
11. Engen, T., Engen, E. A., Clarkson, R. L., & Blackwell, P. M. (1983). Discrimination of intonation by hearing-impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 149-160.
12. Erber, N. P. (1979). Speech perception by profoundly hearing-impaired children. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 44, 255-270.
13. Fu, Q. J., Hsu, C. J., & Horng, M. J. (2004). Effects of processing strategy on Chinese tone recognition by Nucleus-24 cochlear implant users. Ear & Hearing, 25, 501-508.
14. Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 17, 765-768.
15. Geers, A. E., & Moog, J. S. (1989). Evaluating speech perception skills: Tools for measuring benefits of cochlear implants, tactile aids, and hearing aids. In E. Owens & D. K. Kessler (Eds.), Cochlear implants in young deaf children (pp. 227-256). Boston: College Hill.
16. Gold, T. G. (1987). Communication skills of mainstreamed hearing-impaired children. In H. Levitt, N. S. McGarr, & D. Geffner (Eds.), Development of language and communication skills in hearing-impaired children (pp. 108-122). ASHA Monograph, 26.
17. Grant, K. W. (1987). Identification of intonation contours by normally hearing and profoundly hearing impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1172-1178.
18. Green, T., Faulkner, A., & Rosen, S. (2004). Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society in America, 116, 2298-2310.
19. Greenwood, D. D. (1990). A cochlear frequency-position function for several species: 29 years later. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 87, 2592-2605.
20. Harrison, R. V., Gordon, K. A., & Mount, R. J. (2005). Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing speech perception performance after implantation. Developmental Psychology, 46, 252-261.
21. Henry, B. A., & Turner, C. W. (2003). The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 2861-2873.
22. Isenberg, D., & Gay, T. (1978). Acoustic correlates of perceived stress in an isolated synthetic disyllable. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 64, S21.
23. Jackson, P., & Kelly, D. (1986). The relationship between word and stress pattern recognition ability and hearing level in hearing impaired young adults. Volta Review, 88, 279-288.
24. Keifer, J., Hohl, S., Stürsebecher, E., Pfennigdorff, T., & Gstöettner, W. (2001). Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology, 40, 32-42.
25. Ketten, D. R., Skinner, M. W., Wang, G., Vannier, M. W., Gates, G. A., & Neely, J. G. (1998). In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Annals of Otology Rhinology Laryngology Supplement, 175, 1-16.
26. Kishon-Rabin, L., Eran, O., & Boothroyd, A. (1990). Hebrew version of the speech pattern contrast (SPAC) test. Unpublished Report #42. New York: Graduate Center, City University of New York.
27. Kishon-Rabin, L., Taitelbaum, R., Segal, O., Henkin, Y., Tene, S., Muchnik, C., et al. (2000). Speech perception: Implanted vs. aided children. In S. Waltzman & N. Cohen (Eds.), Cochlear implants (pp. 212-214). New York: Thieme.
28. Klieve, S., & Jeanes, R. C. (2001). Perception of prosodic features by children with cochlear implants: Is it sufficient for understanding meaning differences in language? Deafness and Education International, 3(1), 15-37.
29. Kong, Y-Y., Stickney, G., & Zeng, F-G. (2005). Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 117, 1351-1361.
30. Ling, D. (1976). Speech and the hearing impaired child: Theory and practice. Washington, DC: A.G. Bell Association for the Deaf.
31. Linthicum, F. H., Fayad, J., Otto, S. R., Galey, F. R., & House, W. F. (1991). Cochlear implant histopathology. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 12, 245-311.
32. Meyer, T. A., Svirsky, M. A., Kirk, K. I., & Miyamoto, R. T. (1998). Improvement in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: Effects of device, communication mode, and chronological age. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 41, 846-858.
33. Moore, B. C. J. (1998). Cochlear hearing loss. London: Whurr.
34. Most, T. (1985). Perception of intonation by severely and profoundly hearing impaired children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
35. Most, T. (2000). Production and perception of syllable stress by children with normal hearning and children with hearing impairment. Volta Review, 101(2), 51-70.
36. Most, T., & Frank, Y. (1991). The relationship between the perception and the production of intonation by hearing impaired children. Volta Review, 93, 301-309.
37. Most, T., & Frank, Y. (1994). The effect of age and hearing loss on tasks of perception and production of intonation. Volta Review, 96 137-149.
38. Nadol, J. B., Young, Y-S., & Glynn, R. J. (1989). Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: Implications for cochlear implantation. American Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 98, 411-416.
39. Novelli-Olmstead, T., & Ling, D. (1984). Speech production and speech discrimination by hearing impaired children. Volta Review, 86, 72-80.
40. O'Halpin, R., Falkoner, A., Rosen, S., & Viani, L. (2006, March). The perception of stress and intonation by children with cochlear implants Paper Presented at the 8th European Symposium of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation, Venice, Italy.
41. Osberger, M. J., & McGarr, N. (1982). Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. In N. Lass (Ed.), Speech and language advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 8, pp. 221-283). New York: Academic Press.
42. Pasanisi, E., Bacciu, A., Vincenzo, V., Guida, M., Berghenti, M. T., Barbot, A., et al. (2002). Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 64, 159-163.
43. Psarros, C. E., Plant, K. L., Lee, K., Decker, J. A., Whitford, L. A., & Cowan, R. S. C. (2002). Convention from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: Speech perception and speech production outcomes. Ear & Hearing, 23(1S), 18S-27S.
44. Rubin-Spitz, J., & McGarr, N. (1986). Perception of stress contrasts by the hearing impaired. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 79 1), 10S.
45. Snow, D. (2001). Transcription of suprasegmentals. Topics in Language Disorders, 21(4), 41-51.
46. Stark, R. E., & Levitt, H. (1974). Prosodic feature reception and production in deaf children. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. 55(S63).
47. Waltzman, S., & Hochberg, I. (1990). Perception of speech pattern contrasts using a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear & Hearing, 11 1), 50-55.
48. Weiss, A. L., Carney, A. E., & Leonard, L. B. (1985). Perceived contrastive stress production in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing children. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 28, 26-35.