An experimental test of strategic trade policy

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 144-156

  Engelmann, Dirk ^a   Normann, Hans Theo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Commercial policy; Experimental economics; Strategic commitment

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447540348     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ansic D. Note: a pilot experimental test of trade hysteresis. Managerial and Decision Economics 16 (1995) 85-91
2. Baldwin R., and Krugman P. Market access and competition: a simulation study of 16 K random access memories. In: Feenstra R. (Ed). Empirical Methods for International Trade (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 171-197
3. Brander, J.A., 1995. Strategic trade policy. In: Grossman, G., Rogoff, K. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 1395-1455.
4. Brander J.A., and Spencer B. Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics 18 (1985) 83-100
5. Charness G., and Rabin M. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2002) 817-869
6. Cooper R., DeJong D.V., Forsythe R., and Ross T.W. Cooperation without reputation: experimental evidence from prisoner's dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior 12 (1996) 187-218
7. Dixit A. Optimal trade and industrial policies for the US automobile industry. In: Feenstra R. (Ed). Empirical Methods for International Trade (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 141-165
8. Eaton J., and Grossman G.M. Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 (1986) 383-406
9. Engelmann D., and Strobel M. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review 94 (2004) 857-869
10. Engelmann, D., Normann, H., 2003. An experimental test of strategic trade policy. CERGE-EI working paper No. 212.
11. Fehr E., and Schmidt K.M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999) 817-868
12. Fischbacher, U., 1999. Z-Tree, Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Working paper Nr. 21, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
13. Franciosi R., Kujal P., Michelitsch R., Smith V., and Deng G. Fairness: effect on temporary and equilibrium prices in posted-offer markets. The Economic Journal 105 (1995) 938-950
14. Grossman G.M. Promoting new industrial activities: a survey of recent arguments and evidence. OECD-Economic Studies 14 (1990) 87-125
15. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Shachat K., and Smith V. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7 (1994) 346-380
16. Holt C.H. An experimental test of the consistent-conjectures hypothesis. American Economic Review 75 (1985) 314-325
17. Krishna K., Hogan K., and Swagel P. The non-optimality of optimal trade policies: the US automobile industry revisited 1979-1985. In: Krugman P., and Smith A. (Eds). Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 11-36
18. Krugman P. The narrow and the broad arguments for free trade. American Economic Review 83 (1993) 362-366
19. Maggi G. Strategic trade policies with endogenous mode of competition. American Economic Review 86 (1996) 237-258
20. Noussair C.N., Plott C., and Riezman R.G. An experimental investigation of the patterns of international trade. American Economic Review 85 (1995) 462-491
21. Noussair C.N., Plott C., and Riezman R.G. The principles of exchange rate determination in an international finance experiment. Journal of Political Economy (1997) 822-861
22. Riedl, A., van Winden, F., 2005. Input versus output taxation in an experimental international economy. CREED Working Paper, University of Amsterdam.