CDM potential of bagasse cogeneration in India

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 4779-4798

  Purohit, Pallav ^a   Michaelowa, Axel ^b  

^a Hamburg Institute of International Economics   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bagasse cogeneration; Clean development mechanism; India

Indexed keywords

BAGASSE COGENERATION; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM;

BAGASSE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INDIA; INVESTMENTS; POWER GENERATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; COGENERATION; DEVELOPING WORLD; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENERGY USE; ESTIMATION METHOD; INVESTMENT; MITIGATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TREND ANALYSIS;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 34447509281     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.029     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ang B.W., and Ng T.T. The Use of Growth Curves in Energy Studies. Energy 17 1 (1992) 25-36
2. Banerjee R. Comparison of options for distributed generation in India. Energy Policy 34 1 (2006) 101-111
3. Bhattacharya S.C., Attalage R.A., Leon M.A., Amur G.Q., Salam P.A., and Thanawat C. Potential of biomass fuel conservation in selected Asian countries. Energy Conversion and Management 40 11 (1999) 1141-1162
4. Bode S., and Michaelowa A. Avoiding perverse effects of baseline and investment additionality determination in the case of renewable energy projects. Energy Policy 31 6 (2003) 505-517
5. CEA 2007. Baseline Carbon Dioxide Emission Database: Version 1.1. Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Ministry of Power, Government of India, New Delhi.
6. CEC. Cogeneration Handbook (1982), California Energy Commission, California
7. Cundy V.A., Maples D., and Tauzin C. Combustion of bagasse: use of an agricultural-derived waste. Fuel 62 7 (1983) 775-780
8. Das P., Ganesh A., and Wangikar P. Influence of pretreatment for deashing of sugarcane bagasse on pyrolysis products. Biomass and Bioenergy 27 5 (2004) 445-457
9. Eniasivam S. India: Utopia amidst political chaos and myopia?. World Cogeneration 7 5 (1995)
10. ESCAP. 2000. Guidebook on Cogeneration as a Means of Pollution Control and Energy Efficiency in Asia. Environment and Sustainable Development Division (ESDD), United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), Bangkok.
11. FAO. 2007. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome 〈http://apps.fao.org/page/collections?subset=agriculture accessed on 13 February 2007〉.
12. FAO. Changing Patterns in India: a report on pulping prospects. Unasylva 36 2 (1984) 44-51
13. GRI. Policy Implications of the GRI Baseline Projection of US Energy Supply and Demand to 2015 (1996), Gas Research Institute, USA
14. Habib M.A. Thermodynamic analysis of the performance of cogeneration plants. Energy 17 5 (1992) 485-491
15. ICRA. The Indian Sugar Industry: July 2006 (2006), Information and Credit Rating Agency (ICRA), Gurgaon
16. IREDA. 2006. Biomass Power And Cogeneration Programme Guidelines for Loan Assistance. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited (IREDA), New Delhi 〈http://www.iredaltd.com/pdf/biomass_cogen.pdf〉.
17. Islam M.N., and Haque M.M. Technology, Planning and Control (1994), World University Service Press, Dhaka
18. Kartha S., Lazarus M., and Bosi M. Baseline recommendations for greenhouse gas mitigation projects in the electric power sector. Energy Policy 32 4 (2004) 545-566
19. Kumar A., Purohit P., Rana S., and Kandpal T.C. An approach to the estimation of the value of agricultural residues used as biofuels. Biomass and Bioenergy 22 3 (2002) 195-203
20. Lok Sabha Secretariat (2005). Biomass power/cogeneration programme: an evaluation. Standing Committee on Energy (2005-06), Fourteenth Lok Sabha, Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, New Delhi, submitted for publication.
21. Loulou R., Shukla P.R., and Kanudia A. Energy and Environmental Policies for a Sustainable Future: Analysis with the Indian MARKAL Model (1997), Allied Publishers Limited, New Delhi
22. Martino J.P. A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70 8 (2003) 719-733
23. Martinot E. Renewables 2005: Global Status Report. Renewable Energy Policy Network (REN21) (2005), Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC
24. Mbohwa C., and Fukuda S. Electricity from bagasse in Zimbabwe. Biomass and Bioenergy 25 2 (2003) 197-207
25. Mbohwa C.T. Bagasse energy cogeneration potential in the Zimbabwean sugar industry. Renewable Energy 28 2 (2002) 191-204
26. Mbohwa C.T. Zimbabwe: where the electricity industry needs to go?. The Electricity Journal 15 7 (2002) 82-91
27. MFCA. 2007. Department of Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Food and Consumer Affairs (MFCA), Government of India, website 〈http://fcamin.nic.in〉 accessed on 13 February 2007.
28. Michaelowa A., and Jotzo F. Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 33 4 (2005) 511-523
29. Michaelowa A., Stronzik M., Eckermann F., and Hunt A. Transaction costs of the Kyoto Mechanisms. Climate Policy 3 3 (2003) 261-278
30. MNES. Baselines for Renewable Energy Projects under Clean Development Mechanism. Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources (2003), Government of India, New Delhi
31. MNES. 2006. Annual Report: 2005-06. Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources (MNES), Government of India, New Delhi.
32. MOA. 2003. Indian Agricultural Statistics at a Glance: 2002-03. Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), Government of India, New Delhi.
33. Murty M.N., Kumar S., and Paul M. Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: a case study of the sugar industry in India. Journal of Environmental Management 79 1 (2006) 1-9
34. Osawa B. Cogeneration in Kenya: opportunities and implications?. Refocus 5 5 (2004) 34-37
35. Perez M., Chaala A., and Roy C. Vacuum pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 65 2 (2002) 111-136
36. Prasertsan S., and Sajjakulnukit B. Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: potential, opportunity and barriers. Renewable Energy 31 5 (2006) 599-610
37. Purohit P., and Kandpal T.C. Renewable energy technologies for irrigation water pumping in India: projected levels of dissemination, energy delivery and investment requirements using available diffusion models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 9 6 (2005) 592-607
38. Purohit, P., Michaelowa, A., 2006. CDM potential of SPV pumps in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.011.
39. Purohit, P., Michaelowa, A., 2007. CDM potential of SPV lighting systems in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, doi:10.1007/s11027-006-9078x.
40. 2 emissions mitigation potential of bagasse based cogeneration in India. Proceeding of the ISES Solar World Congress 2005, Florida.
41. Quevauvilliers, J.M., 2001. Implications for cogeneration industry: description of an advanced cogeneration plant. Paper Presented to the AFREPREN Energy Workshop on Power Sector Reforms-Implications for the Cogeneration Industry, Quatre Bornes, Mauritius, August 2001.
42. Reddy K.B.K. Bagasse based co-generation: potential and prospects in India. IREDA News 8 3 (1997) 147
43. Sharma M.P., and Sharma J.D. Bagasse based co-generation system for Indian sugar mills. Renewable Energy 16 1-4 (1999) 1011-1014
44. Skelton, T., 1996. Small-Scale Cogeneration: Revised Analysis. Centre for Analysis and Dissemination of Demonstrated Energy Technologies Newsletter, No. 1.
45. Smouse S.M., Staats G.E., Rao S.N., Goldman R., and Hess D. Promotion of biomass cogeneration with power export in the Indian sugar industry. Fuel Processing Technology 54 1-3 (1998) 227-247
46. SRS, 2007. Shree Renuka Sugars (SRS) Ltd. Mumbai website www.renukasugars.com accessed on 13 February 2007.
47. Szklo A.S., and Tolmasquim M.T. Strategic cogeneration-fresh horizons for the development of cogeneration in Brazil. Applied Energy 69 4 (2001) 257-268
48. UNFCCC, 2002. Decision 17/CP.7, Report of the Conference of Parties on its Seventh Session, Marrakesh. 〈http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13a02.pdf〉.
49. UNFCCC, 2006. Indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small-scale project activity categories. Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities, Version 8, 3 March, Bonn.
50. USAID, 1993. Advancing cogeneration in the Indian sugar industry. USAID Report No. 93-02, Winrock International, USA.
51. WADE. Bagasse Cogeneration-Global Review and Potential (2004), World Alliance for Decentralized Energy, UK
52. WADE. Cogeneration and On-Site Production: Review Issue 2005-2006 (2005), World Alliance for Decentralized Energy, UK
53. WRI. World Resources 1994-1995 - A Guide to the Global Environment (1994), World Resources Institute (WRI), Washington, DC