Comparison of options for distributed generation in India

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 101-111

  Banerjee, Rangan ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Annualized life cycle cost; Distributed generation; Load factor

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COSTS; DIESEL FUELS; FUEL CELLS; GASIFICATION; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

COST REDUCTION; DISTRIBUTED GENERATION (DG); LOAD FACTORS;

ENERGY MANAGEMENT;

ELECTRICITY GENERATION;

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA; WORLD;

EID: 20444503388     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. T. Ackerman G. Andersson L. Sodder Distributed generation: A definition Electric Power Systems Research 57 2001 195-204
2. ASCENT, 1998. Status of Biomass Gasification Technology, India, October 1998; http://www.bgtechnologies.net/ankur.htm.
3. A.M. Borbely J.F. Kreider Distributed Generation, The Power Paradigm for the New Millennium 2001 CRC Press Boca Raton, USA
4. DESI Power, 2003. www.desipower.com.
5. A. Ganesh R. Banerjee Biomass pyrolysis for power generation-a potential technology Renewable Energy 22 2001 9-14
6. Gokak Committee Report on Distributed Generation, 2003. Submitted to the Ministry of Power, Government of India, 2003; available at powermin.nic.in.
7. ICRA, 2003. Indian Credit Rating Agency New Delhi, Rating Feature, The Indian Natural Gas Industry, January; available on the web at // www.icraindia.com/biz-arch/naturalgasindustry-changes.pdf.
8. Ministry of Non Conventional Energy Sources, 2001. Renewable Energy in India, Business Opportunities, Government of India, March 2001.
9. Ministry of Non Conventional Energy Sources, 2002. Wind power development in India: Towards global leadership; New Delhi, October 2002.
10. Ministry of Non Conventional Energy Sources, Annual Reports, New Delhi, 1993, 2000, 2001, 2002.
11. Ministry of Power, 2001. Blueprint for Power Sector Development, Government of India, New Delhi; available at powermin.nic.in.
12. Ministry of Power, 2003a. Annual Report 2002-2003, Government of India, New Delhi.
13. Ministry of Power, 2003b. Discussion Paper on Rural Electrification Policies, November 2003, Government of India, New Delhi.
14. Mukunda, H. S., 1999. A biomass option for enhancing energy security. NIAS Report R4-99, National Institute of Advanced Studies, IISc Bangalore.
15. Parikh, P.P., 1984. State of the Art Report on Gasification of Biomass, Report submitted to DNES, Government of India.
16. J. Raghu Ram R. Banerjee Energy and cogeneration targeting for a sugar factory Applied Thermal Engineering 23 2003 1567-1575
17. N.H. Ravindranath D.O. Hall Biomass Energy, and Environment, A Developing Country Perspective From India 1995 Oxford University Press New York
18. Resource Dynamics Corporation, 2001. Assessment of Distributed Generation Technology Applications, Prepared for Maine Public Utilities Commission by Resource Dynamics Corporation, Vienna, VA, USA; available on the web at //www.distributed-generation.com.
19. S.M. Smouse G.E. Staats S.N. Rao R. Golman D. Hess Promotion of biomass cogeneration with power export in the Indian sugar industry Fuel Processing Technology 54 1998 227-247
20. Tata Energy Data Directory, 1999. Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi, 2000.
21. USDOE, Department of Energy, 1998. Fuel Cell Handbook, Fourth Edition, November 1998, Office of Fossil Energy, Federal Energy Technology Centre, Pittsburgh, USA; available on the web at //www.fetc.doe.gov/ publications.
22. USDOE, 2003. Energy Prices from the Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy; available on the web at http://www.eia.doe.gov/price.html.