An econometric analysis of deficiencies noted in port state control inspections

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 243-258

  Cariou, Pierre ^a   Mejia, Maximo Q ^a,b   Wolff, Francois Charles ^c  

^a WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARGO HANDLING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FERRY BOATS; INSPECTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POISSON EQUATION; PORTS AND HARBORS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

ECONOMETRICS; PORT; PORT OPERATION; VESSEL;

EID: 34447337756     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: 14645254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088830701343047     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kasoulides, GC (1993) Port State Control and Jurisdiction: Evolution of the Port State Regime, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
2. Özçayir Z.O. (2001) Port State Control, LLP, London
3. Clarke, A. (1994) Port state control or sub-standard ships: Who is to blame? What is the cure?. Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2, pp. 202-209.
4. Kiehne, G. (1996) Investigation, detention and release of ships under the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control: A view from practice. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 11, pp. 217-224.
5. Cuttler, M. (1995) Incentives for reducing oil pollution from ships: The case for enhanced port state control. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 8, pp. 175-204.
6. Hare, J. (1997) Port state control: Strong medicine to cure a sick industry. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 26, pp. 571-594.
7. Mcdorman, TL (2000) Regional port state control agreements: Some issues of international law. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 5, pp. 207-225.
8. Owen, P. (1996) Port state control and ship deficiencies. The International Journal of Shipping Law, 5, pp. 267-274.
9. Odeke, A. (1997) Port state control and UK law. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 8, pp. 657-665.
10. Bell, D. (1993) Port State control v flag State control: UK government position. Marine Policy, 17, pp. 367-370.
11. Payoyo, PB (1994) Implementation of international conventions through port state control: An assessment. Marine Policy, 18, pp. 379-392.
12. Özçayir, ZO (2001) The role of port state control. International Maritime Law, 8, pp. 147-159.
13. Özçayir, ZO (2001) Inspection campaigns. International Maritime Law, 8, pp. 171-175.
14. Greene, WH (2003) Econometric Analysis,, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
15. Cameron, C. and Triverdi, P. (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge University Press, New York
16. Winkelmann, R. (2000) Econometric Analysis of Count Data, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany
17. Hausman, J., Hall, B. and Griliches, Z. (1984) Economic models for count data with an application to the Patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, pp. 902-938.
18. Train, KE (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Talley, WK, Jin, D. and Kite-Powell, HK (2005) Determinants of crew injuries in vessel accidents. Maritime policy and Management, 32, pp. 263-278.
20. Cameron, C. and Trivedi, P. (1990) Regression based tested for over-dispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp. 347-364.
21. Fields, G. (2003) Accounting for income inequality and its change: A new method with application to the distribution of earnings in the United States. Research in Labor Economics, 22, pp. 1-38.
22. Mejia Jr, MQ (2005) Evaluating the ISM Code Using Port State Control Statistics, Lund University Department of Design Sciences, Lund, Sweden