Erratum: Simple models show the general advantages of dendrites in coincidence detection (Journal of Neurophysiology (2007) 97, (3449-3459) DOI: 10.1152/jn.00669.2005);Simple models show the general advantages of dendrites in coincidence detection

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 3449-3459

  Dasika, Vasant K ^a,b,c   White, John A ^a,b   Colburn, H Steven ^a,b  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BRAIN FUNCTION; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; COMPARTMENT MODEL; DENDRITE; DENDRITIC CELL; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; HEARING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENDRITES; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS;

EID: 34447324142     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.z9k-8470-corr.2007     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. Agmon-Snir H, Carr CE, Rinzel J. The role of dendrites in auditory coincidence detection. Nature 393: 268-272, 1998.
2. Archie KA, Mel BW. A model for intradendritic computation of binocular disparity. Nat Neurosci 3: 54-63, 2000.
3. Boord RL. Ascending projections of the primary cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris in the pigeon. J Comp Neurol 133: 523-541, 1968.
4. Brand A, Behrend O, Marquardt T, McAlpine D, Grothe B. Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding. Nature 30: 543-547, 2002.
5. Brew HM. Modeling of interaural time difference detection by neurons of mammalian superior olivary nucleus. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 25: 680, 1998.
6. Brown CH. Sound localization. In: Comparative Hearing: Mammals. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994, vol. 4.
7. Carr CE, Boudreau RE. Organization of the nucleus magnocellularis and the nucleus laminaris in the barn owl: encoding and measuring interaural time differences. J Comp Neurol 334: 337-355, 1993.
8. Dasika VK, White JA, Carney LH, Colburn HS. Effects of inhibitory feedback in a network model of avian brain stem. J Neurophysiol 94: 400-414, 2005.
9. Durlach NI, Colburn HS. Binaural phenomena. In: Handbook of Perception. New York: Academic Press, 1978, vol. 4.
10. Funabiki K, Koyano K, Ohmori H. The role of GABAergic inputs for coincidence detection in the neurons of nucleus laminaris of the chick. J Physiol 508: 851-869, 1998.
11. Grau-Serrat V, Carr CE, Simon JZ. Modeling coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris. Biol Cybern 89: 388-396, 2003.
12. Grothe B. New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 540-550, 2003.
13. Grothe B, Sanes DH. Synaptic inhibition influences the temporal coding properties of medial superior olivary neurons: an in vitro study. J Neurosci 14: 1701-1709, 1994.
14. Jeffress LA. A place theory of sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psych 41: 35-39, 1948.
15. Joris PX, Smith PH, Yin TC. Coincidence detection in the auditory system: 50 years after Jeffress. Neuron 21: 1235-1238, 1998.
16. Joseph AW, Hyson RL. Coincidence detection by binaural neurons in the chick brain stem. J Neurophysiol 69: 1197-1211, 1993.
17. Koch C. Biophysics of Computation. Information Processing in Single Neurons. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, p. 19-37, 1999.
18. Kuba H, Yamada R, Fukui I, Ohmori H. Tonotopic specialization of auditory coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris of the chick. J Neurosci 25: 1924-1934, 2005.
19. MacLeod KM, Soares D, Carr CE. Interaural timing difference circuits in the auditory brainstem of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). J Comp Neurol 495: 185-201, 2006.
20. Parks TN, Rubel EW. Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: organization of projections from n. magnocellularis to n. laminaris. J Comp Neurol 164: 435-448, 1975.
21. Pinsky PF, Rinzel J. Intrinsic and network rhythmogenesis in a reduced Traub model for CA3 neurons. J Comput Neurosci 1: 39-60, 1994.
22. Rall W. Cable properties of dendrites and effects of synaptic location. In: Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms, edited by Anderson P, Jansen JKS. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget, 1970, p. 175-187.
23. Rall W. Theoretical significance of dendritic trees for neuronal input-output relations (1964). In: The Theoretical Foundation of Dendritic Function: Selected Papers of Wilfrid Rall with Commentaries, edited by Segev I, Rinzel J, Shephard G. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995, p. 122-146.
24. Ramón y Cajal S. Les ganglions terminaux du nerf acoustique des oiseaux [in French]. Trab Lab Invest Biol Univ Madrid 6: 195-225, 1908.
25. Reyes AD, Rubel EW, Spain WJ. In vitro analysis of optimal stimuli for phase-locking and time-delayed modulation of firing in avian nucleus laminaris neurons. J Neurosci 16: 993-1007, 1996.
26. Rothman JS, Young ED, Manis PB. Convergence of auditory nerve fibers onto bushy cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus: implications of a computational model. J Neurophysiol 70: 2562-2583, 1993.
27. Segev I. Sound grounds for computing dendrites. Nature 393: 207-208, 1998.
28. Simon J, Carr CE, Shamma S. A dendritic model of coincidence detection in the avian brainstem. Neurocomputing 26/27: 263-269, 1999.
29. Smith DJ, Rubel EW. Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: dendritic gradients in nucleus laminaris. J Comp Neurol 186: 213-239, 1979.
30. Smith PH. Structural and functional differences distinguish principal from nonprincipal cells in the guinea pig MSO slice. J Neurophysiol 73: 1653-1667, 1995.
31. Smith ZD. Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: dendritic development in n. laminaris. J Comp Neurol 203: 309-333, 1981.
32. Stotler W. An experimental study of the cells and connections of the superior olivary complex of the cat. J Comp Neurol 98: 401-432, 1953.
33. Svirskis G, Dodla R, Rinzel J. Subthreshold outward currents enhance temporal integration in auditory neurons. Biol Cybern 89: 333-340, 2003.
34. Svirskis G, Kotak V, Sanes D, Rinzel J. Sodium along with low-threshold potassium currents enhance coincidence detection of subthreshold noisy signals in MSO neurons. J Neurophysiol 91: 2465-2473, 2004.
35. Traub RD, Wong RK, Miles R, Michelson H. A model of a CA3 hippocampal pyramidal neuron incorporating voltage-clamp data on intrinsic conductances. J Neurophysiol 66: 635-650, 1991.
36. Warchol ME, Dallos P. Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol A Sens Neural Behav Physiol 166: 721-734, 1990.
37. Williams SR, Stuart GJ. Dependence of EPSP efficacy on synapse location in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Science 295: 1907-1910, 2002.
38. Xu NL, Ye CQ, Poo MM, Zhang XH. Coincidence detection of synaptic inputs is facilitated at the distal dendrites after long-term potentiation induction. J Neurosci 26: 3002-3009, 2006.
39. Yang L, Monsivais P, Rubel EW. The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem. J Neurosci 19: 2313-2325, 1999.
40. Zhou Y, Carney LH, Colburn HS. A model for interaural time difference sensitivity in the medial superior olive: interaction of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs, channel dynamics, and cellular morphology. J Neurosci 25: 3046-3058, 2005.