Angio-seal in antegrade endovascular interventions: Technical success and complications in a 55-patient series

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 382-386

  Kapoor, Baljendra ^a   Panu, Anukul ^b   Berscheid, Bruce ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^c Saskatoon Health Region St Pauls Hospital   (Canada)

Author keywords

Common femoral artery; Hemostasis; Outcome analysis; Vascular access; Vascular closure device

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY PUNCTURE; COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY; DEVICE; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMATOMA; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VASCULAR ACCESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMATOMA; HEMORRHAGE; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUNCTURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34447319129     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/06-2050.1     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Ricci MA, Trevisani GT, Pilcher DB. Vascular complications of cardiac catheterization. Am J Surg. 1994;167:375-378.
2. Eidt JF, Habibipour S, Saucedo JF, et al. Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices. Am J Surg. 1999;178:511-516.
3. Aksoy M, Becquemin J-P, Desgranges P, et al. The safety and efficacy of Angioseal in therapeutic endovascular interventions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:90-93.
4. Semler HJ. Transfemoral catheterization: mechanical versus manual control of bleeding. Radiology. 1985;154:234-235.
5. Prayck J, Wall TC, Longabaugh P, et al. A randomized trial of vascular hemostasis techniques to reduce femoral vascular complications after coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:970-976.
6. Michalis L, Rees M, Patsouras D, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of three commercially available closure devices (Angioseal, Vasoseal and Duett). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:423-429.
7. Abando A, Hood D, Weaver F, et al. The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:287-290.
8. Vaitkus PT. A metaanlysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:243-246.
9. Bos JJ, Hunink MG, Mali WP. Use of a collagen hemostatic closure device to achieve hemostasis after arterial puncture: a cost effective analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7:479-486.
10. Silber S, Tofte A, Kjellevand T, et al. Report of the European multicentre registry using the Duett vascular sealing device. Hertz. 1999;24:620-623.
11. Silber S. 10 years of arterial closure devices: a critical analysis of their use after PTCA. Z Kardiol. 2000;89:383-389.
12. Mukhopadhyay K, Puckett MA, Roobottom CA. Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56:409-412.
13. Kirchhof C, Schickel S, Schmidt-Lucke JA. Local vascular complications after use of the hemostatic puncture closure device Angioseal. Vasa. 2002;31:101-106.
14. Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, et al. Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:3-7.
15. Wide J, Vos JA, Overtoom TT, et al. Acute leg ischemia: the dark side of a percutaneous femoral closure device. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:278-281.
16. Shaw JA, Gravereaux EC, Winters GL, et al. An unusual cause of claudication. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;60:562-565.