Adoption of Technology-Mediated Distance Education: A longitudinal analysis

Information and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 467-479

  Ozdemir, Zafer D ^a   Abrevaya, Jason ^b  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; E learning; Online learning; Technology Mediated Distance Education

Indexed keywords

ONLINE LEARNING; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY MEDIATED DISTANCE EDUCATION;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 34447314454     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2007.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alavi M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: an empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly 18 2 (1994) 150-174
2. Alavi M., and Leidner D.E. Research commentary: technology-mediated learning-a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research 12 1 (2001) 1-10
3. Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing. Organization Science 3 1 (1992) 1-19
4. S. Baker, H. Green, The Info Tech 100, Business Week, June 21, 2004.
5. Boynton A.C., Zmud R.W., and Jacobs G.C. The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Quarterly 18 3 (1994) 299-318
6. Carnegie Classification Descriptions. Last assessed on May 21, 2007 at: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/index.asp%3Fkey=785.
7. Cohn E., Rhine S.L.W., and Santos M.C. Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: economies of scale and scope. Review of Economics and Statistics 71 2 (1989) 284-290
8. Cooper R.B., and Zmud R.W. Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36 2 (1990) 123-139
9. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989) 319-340
10. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
11. Ehrenberg R.G. The supply of American higher education institutions. In: McPherson M., and Schapiro M. (Eds). Ford Policy Forum 2001: Exploring the Economics of Higher Education (2001), Forum for the Future of Higher Education, Cambridge, MA 15-23
12. Eveland J.D., and Tornatzky L.G. The deployment of technology. In: Tornatzky L.G., and Fleischer M. (Eds). The Process of Technological Innovation (1990), Lexington Books, Lexington, MA 117-148
13. Fichman R.G. The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. In: Zmud R.W. (Ed). Framing the Domains of IT Management (2000), Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, OH 105-127
14. Forman C., Goldfarb A., and Greenstein S. How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. Journal of Urban Economics 58 3 (2005) 389-420
15. Hannan T., and McDowell J. The determinants of technology adoption: the case of the banking firm. Rand Journal of Economics 15 3 (1984) 328-335
16. Jasperson J.S., Carter P.E., and Zmud R.W. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoption behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly 29 3 (2005) 525-557
17. Kettinger W.J., and Grover V. The use of computer-mediated communication in an interorganizational context. Decision Sciences 28 3 (1997) 513-555
18. Kimberly J.R., and Evanisko M.J. Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technical and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal 24 4 (1981) 689-713
19. Leidner D.E., and Fuller M. Improving student learning of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning. Decision Support Systems 20 2 (1997) 149-163
20. Leidner D.E., and Jarvenpaa S.K. The information age confronts education: case studies on electronic classrooms. Information Systems Research 4 1 (1993) 24-54
21. L. Lewis, D. Levin, B. Greene, Distance education at postsecondary institution: 1997-1998. 1999. Last accessed on May 21, 2007 at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000013.pdf.
22. Nerlove M. On tuition and the costs of higher education. The Journal of Political Economy 80 3 (1972) S178-S218
23. Ong C., Lai J., and Wang Y. Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management 41 6 (2004) 795-804
24. Z.D. Ozdemir, K. Altinkemer, J.M. Barron, Adoption of Technology-Mediated Distance Education among Higher-Education Institutions, Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, IN, submitted for publication.
25. Piccoli G., Ahmad R., and Ives B. Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly 25 4 (2001) 401-426
26. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations (1995), Free Press, New York
27. Saadé R., and Bahli B. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42 2 (2005) 317-327
28. Swanson E.B. Information systems innovations among organizations. Management Science 40 9 (1994) 1069-1092
29. W.C. Symonds, Colleges in crisis, Business Week, April 28, 2003.
30. Thompson R.L., Higgins C.A., and Howell J.M. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly 15 1 (1991) 125-143
31. Toutkoushian R.K. Changes in the demand for public land-grant universities: the use of panel datasets. Research in Higher Education 42 6 (2001) 679-707
32. U.S. Census Bureau Computer and Internet use in the United States, 2003. Last accessed on May 21, 2007 at http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p23-208.pdf.
33. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., and Ackerman P.L. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83 1 (2000) 33-60
34. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
35. T. Waits, L. Lewis, B. Greene, Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000-2001. Last accessed on 21 May, 2007 at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003017.pdf.
36. Wang Y. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management 41 1 (2003) 75-86
37. Webster J., and Hackley P. Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal 40 6 (2003) 1282-1309 1997
38. Zemsky R., and Oedel P. The Structure of College Choice (1983), College Entrance Examination Board, New York
39. Zhang D., Zhao J.L., Zhou L., and Nunamaker J.F. Can e-learning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM 47 5 (2004) 75-79
40. Zhang D., Zhou L., Briggs R.O., and Nunamaker J.F. Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management 43 1 (2006) 15-27