Semen quality of fertile US males in relation to their mothers' beef consumption during pregnancy

Human Reproduction

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1497-1502

  Swan, Shanna H ^a   Liu, F ^a   Overstreet, J W ^b   Brazil, C ^b   Skakkebaek, N E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Beef; Fertility; Meat; Semen quality; Sperm

Indexed keywords

ANABOLIC AGENT; STEROID; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD CONTAMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; MATERNAL NUTRITION; MEAT; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF REPORT; SEMEN ABNORMALITY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOZOON DENSITY; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SUBFERTILITY; TESTIS DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34447311377     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem068     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andersson AM, Skakkebæk NE. Exposure to exogenous estrogens in food: possible impact on human development and health. Eur J Endocrinol 1999;140:477-85.
2. Bay K, Andersson A-M, Skakkebæk NE. Estradiol levels in prepubertal boys girls - analytical challenges. Int J Androl 2004;27 266-73.
3. Brazil C, Swan SH, Drobnis EZ et al. Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. J Androl 2004; 25:635-44.
4. Carlsen E, Swan SH, Holm PJ et al. Longitudinal changes in semen parameters in young Danish men from the Copenhagen area. Hum Reprod 2005;20:942-9.
5. Cho E, Chen WY, Hunter DJ et al. Red meat intake and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:2253-9.
6. Damgaard IN, Skakkebæk NE, Toppari J et al. Persistent pesticides in human breast milk and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:1133-8.
7. Duby RT, Travis HF. Influence of dienestrol diacetate on reproductive performance of female mink (Mustela vision). Am J Vet Res 1971; 32:1599-602.
8. Epstein SS. The chemical jungle: Today's beef industry. Int J Health Serv 1990;20:277-80.
9. Henricks DM, Gray SL, Owenby JJ et al. Residues from anabolic preparations after good veterinary practice. APMIS 2001;109 273-83.
10. Howell JM, Pickering CM. Suspected synthetic oestrogen poisoning in mink. Vete Rec 1964;76:169-70.
11. Jensen TK, Jørgensen N, Punab M et al. Association of in utero exposure to maternal smoking with reduced semen quality and testis size in adulthood: A cross-sectional study of 1,770 young men from the general population in five European countries. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:49-58.
12. Marcus A. Cancer from Meat. Johns Hopkins Press, 1994.
13. Meyer HH. Biochemistry and physiology of anabolic hormones used for improvement of meat production. APMIS 2001;109:1-8.
14. Parent A-S, Teilmann G, Juul A et al. The timing of normal puberty and the age limits of sexual precocity: Variations around the world, secular trends and changes after migration. Endocr Rev 2003;24 668-93.
15. Raun AP, Preston RL. History of diethylstilbestrol use in cattle. J Am Soc Anim Sci 2002, www.asaa.org/bios/raunhist.pdf
16. SAS Institute. The SAS system for windows, version 8.2. Cary NC SAS Institute, Inc., 2001.
17. Sharpe RM. Pathways of endocrine disruption during male sexual differentiation and masculinization. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:91-110.
18. Skakkebæk NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: An increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod 2001;16:972-8.
19. Stephany RW. Hormones in meat:dIfferent approaches in the EU and in the USA. APMIS 2001;109:S357-S363.
20. Sundqvist C, Amador AG, Bartke A. Reproduction and fertility in the mink (Mustela vision). J Reprod Fertil 1989;85:413-41.
21. Swan SH. Intrauterine exposure to diethylstilbestrol: Long-term effects in humans. APMIS 2000;108:793-804.
22. Swan SH, Brazil C, Drobnis EZ et al. Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males. Environ Health Perspect 2003a; 111:414-20.
23. Swan SH, Kruse RL, Liu F et al. Semen quality in relation to biomarkers of pesticide exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2003b; 111:1478-84.
24. Wade N. DES: A case study of regulatory abdication. Science 1972;177:335-7.
25. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987;1-67.
26. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.