Spatially-Balanced Complete Block designs for field experiments

Geoderma

Volumn 140, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 346-352

  van Es, H M ^a   Gomes, C P ^a   Sellmann, M ^a   van Es, C L ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Agronomy; Autocorrelation; Experimental design; Geostatistics; Periodicity; Trend

Indexed keywords

GEOSTATISTICS; PERIODICITY; RANDOMIZED COMPLETE BLOCK (RCB); SPATIALLY-BALANCED COMPLETE BLOCK (SBCB) DESIGNS;

AGRONOMY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); AUTOCORRELATION; FUNCTIONS; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

SOIL SURVEYS;

AGRONOMY; ANALYTICAL METHOD; AUTOCORRELATION; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD METHOD; GEOSTATISTICS; HETEROGENEITY; LAND EVALUATION; PERIODICITY; TREND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34447308737     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Student. Comparison between balanced and random arrangements of field plots. Biometrika 29 (1938) 363-379
2. Anagnostopoulos A., van Hentenryck M.L., and Vergados Y.P. A simulated annealing approach to the traveling tournament problem. Proc. 5th Intern. Workshop on Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems (CP-AI-OR 2003), Montreal, Canada, May 2003 (2003)
3. Atkinson A.C., and Bailey R.A. One hundred years of the design of experiments on and off the pages of Biometrika. Biometrika 88 (2001) 53-97
4. Brownie C., and Gumperts M.L. Validity of spatial analyses for large field trials. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2 (1997) 1-23
5. Cheng C.S., and Steinberg D.M. Trend-robust two-factorial level designs. Biometrika 78 (1991) 325-336
6. David M. Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation (1977), Elsevier Publ. Co., New York
7. Davidoff B., Lewis J.W., and Selim H.M. A method to verify the presence of a trend in studying spatial variability of soil temperature. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50 (1986) 1122-1127
8. Fagroud M., and van Meirvenne M. Accounting for soil spatial autocorrelation in the design of experimental trials. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66 (2002) 1134-1142
9. Gill P.S., and Sukla G.K. Efficiency of nearest neighbor balanced block designs for correlated observations. Biometrika 72 (1985) 539-544
10. Gomes C., Sellmann M., van Es C., and van Es H. The challenge of generating spatially balanced scientific experiment designs. In: Régin J.-C., and Rueher M. (Eds). Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, First International Conference, CPAIOR 2004, Nice, France, April 20-22, 2004, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3011 Springer 2004 (2004). 3-540-21836-X
11. Jeffreys H. Random and systematic arrangements. Biometrika 31 (1939) 1-8
12. Katsvairo T., Cox W.J., van Es H.M., and Glos M.A. Spatial yield responses of two corn hybrids to two N levels. Agron. J. 95 (2003) 1012-1022
13. Kirk H.J., Haynes F.L., and Monroe R.J. Application of trend analysis to horticultural field trials. J. Am. Hortic. Soc. 105 (1980) 189-193
14. Lopez M.V., and Arrue J.L. Efficiency of an incomplete block design based on geostatistics for tillage experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59 (1995) 1104-1111
15. Magri A., van Es H.M., Glos M., and Cox W.J. Integrated assessment of the use of crop, soil, and remote sensing information for precision management of maize. Precision Agric. 6 (2005) 87-110
16. Martin R.J. On the design of experiments under spatial correlation. Biometrika 73 (1986) 247-277
17. Martin R.J., Eccleston J.A., and Chan B.S.P. Efficient factorial experiments when the data are spatially correlated. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 126 (2004) 377-395
18. McBratney A.B., and Webster R. Detection of ridge and furrow patterns by spectral analysis. Int. Stat. Rev. 49 (1981) 45-52
19. Nielsen D.R., Biggar J.W., and Erh K.T. Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties. Hilgardia 42 (1973) 215-259
20. Papadakis J.S. Methode statistique pour des experiences sur champs. Bull. Inst. Amel. Plantes a Salonique 23 (1937)
21. Russo D., and Bresler E. Effect of field variability in soil hydraulic properties on solutions of unsaturated water and salt flows. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45 (1981) 675-681
22. Tamura R.N., Nelson L.A., and Naderman G.C. An investigation on the validity and usefulness of trend analysis for field plot design. Agron. J. 80 (1988) 712-718
23. van Es H.M. Sources of soil variability. In: Dane J., and Topp C. (Eds). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4: Physical Properties (2002), Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison WI
24. van Es H.M., and van Es C.L. Spatial nature of randomization and its effects on the outcome of field experiments. Agron. J. 85 (1993) 420-428
25. van Es H.M., van Es C.L., and Cassel D.K. Application of regionalized variable theory to large-plot field experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53 (1989) 1178-1183
26. Vieira S.R., Nielsen D.R., and Biggar J.W. Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45 (1981) 1040-1048
27. Watson S. Spatial dependence and block designs in spaced plant herbage trials. J. Agric. Sci. 134 (2000) 245-258
28. Wilkinson G.N., Eckert S.R., Hancock T.W., and Mayo O. Nearest neighbour (NN) analysis of field experiments. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 45 (1983) 151-211
29. Yates F. A new method for arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties. J. Agric. Sci. 26 (1936) 424-455
30. Yates F. The comparative advantages of systematic and randomized arrangements in the design of agricultural and biological experiments. Biometrika 30 (1939) 440-446