Phylogenetic relationships among native and naturalized Hieracium (Asteraceae) in Canada and the United States based on plastid DNA sequences

Systematic Botany

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 478-485

  Gaskin, J F ^a   Wilson, L M ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Chloroplast DNA; Hieracium; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ANDRYALA; ASTERACEAE; HIERACIUM; HIERACIUM CANADENSE; PILOSELLA;

EID: 34447298093     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364407781179752     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
3. BEAMAN, J. 1990. Revision of the Hieracium (Asteraceae) in Mexico and Central America. Systematic Botany Monographs 29: 1-77.
4. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
5. DOYLE, J. J., J. I. DAVIS, R. J. SORENG, D. GARVIN, and M. J. ANDERSON. 1992. Chloroplast DNA inversions and the origin of the grass family (Poaceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A 89: 7722-7726.
6. FEHRER, J., A. KRAHULCOVÁ, F. KRAHULEC, E. BRÄUTIGAM, and S. BRÄUTIGAM. 2003. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of Hieracium subgen. Pilosella and its relationship to the other subgenera and to Andryala. Abstract, 7th Hieracium Workshop, Křivoklát, Czech Republic http://www.ibot.cas.cz/ hieracium/studygroup/presabs.html #20.
7. GADELLA, T. W. J. 1987. Sexual tetraploid and apomictic pentaploid populations of Hieracium pilosella, Compositae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 157: 219-246.
8. GARLAND, M. 1990. Infrageneric names applicable to Hieracium subgenus Chionoracium (Compositae: Lactuceae). Taxon 39: 119-124.
9. GASKIN, J. F. and B. A. SCHAAL. 2002. Hybrid Tamarix widespread in US invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A 99: 11256-11259.
10. GUINDON, S. and O. GASCUEL. 2003. A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696-704.
11. GUPPY, G. 1978. Species relationships of Hieracium (Asteraceae) in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 3008-3019.
12. HAMILTON, M. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molecular Ecology 8: 521-523.
13. HILLIS, D. M., B. K. MABLE, A. LARSON, S. K. DAVIS, and E. A. ZIMMER. 1996. Molecular systematics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
14. LEE, C. and J. WEN. 2004. Phylogeny of Panax using chloroplast trnC-trnD intergenic region and the utility of trnC-trnD in interspecific studies of plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 894-903.
15. MABBERLEY, D. J. 1993. The plant book. ed. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. MADDISON, D. R. and W. P. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.0. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
17. MAKEPEACE, W. 1985. Growth, reproduction, and production biology of mouse-ear and king-devil hawkweed in eastern South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 23: 65-78.
18. MCKOWN, A. D., J. M. MONCALVO, and N. G. DENGLER. 2005. Phylogeny of Flaveria (Asteraceae) and inference of C-4 photosynthesis evolution. American Journal of Botany 92: 1911-1928.
19. MORGAN-RICHARDS, M., S. A. TREWICK, H. M. CHAPMAN, and A. KRAHULCOVA. 2004. Interspecific hybridization among Hieracium species in New Zealand: evidence from flow cytometry. Heredity 93: 34-42.
20. PELSER, P. B., B. GRAVENDEEL, and R. VAN DER MEIJDEN. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction in the gap between too little and too much divergence: the closest relatives of Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae) according to DNA sequences and AFLPs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 613-628.
21. PEMBERTON, R. W. 2000. Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control. Oecologia 125: 489-494.
22. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest, testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinfomatics 14: 817-818.
23. RAMBAUT, A. 1996. Se-Al sequence alignment editor, version v1.0 alpha 1. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/software.html.
24. READER, R. J. 1978. Structural changes in a Hieracium floribundum (Compositae) population associated with the process of patch formation. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 1-9.
25. ROLHF, F. J. and R. R. SOKAL. 1995. Statistical tables. 3rd edition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
26. SAMUEL, R., T. F. STUESSY, K. TREMETSBERGER, C. M. BAEZA, and S. SILJAK-YAKOVLEV. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) based on ITS, plastid trnL intron, trnL-F spacer, and matK sequences. American Journal of Botany 90: 496-507.
27. SELL, P. 1987. An introduction to the study of the British Hieracia, 1. History and classification. Watsonia 16: 365-371.
28. SHAW, H. 1973. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. ed. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. SIMMONS, M. and H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
30. STROTHER, J. L. 2006. Hieracium. Pp. 278-294 in Flora of North America North of Mexico. vols. 19-21, eds. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2000. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
32. TABERLET, P., L. GEILLY, G. PAUTOU, and J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
33. TREWICK, S. A., M. MORGAN-RICHARDS, and H. M. CHAPMAN. 2004. Chloroplast DNA diversity of Hieracium pilosella (Asteraceae) introduced to New Zealand: reticulation, hybridization, and invasion. American Journal of Botany 91: 73-85.
34. TUTIN, T. G., V. H. HEYWOOD, N. A. BURGESS, D. M. MOORE, D. H. VALENTINE, S. M. WALTERS, and D. A. WEBB. 1976. Flora Europea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. USDA. 2005. The PLANTS database national plant data center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 U.S.A. http://plants.usda.gov/
36. VOSS, E. G. and M. W. BOHLKE. 1978. The status of certain hawkweeds (Hieracium subgenus Pilosella) in Michigan. Michigan Botanist 17: 35-47.
37. WAPSHERE, A. J. 1974. A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Annals of Applied Biology 77: 201-211.
38. WILSON, L. M. and R. H. CALLIHAN. 1999. Meadow and orange hawkweed. Pp. 238-248 in Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds, eds. R. L. Sheely and J. Petroff. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
39. _, J. FEHRER, S. BRÄUTIGAM, and G. GROSSKOPF. 2006. A new invasive hawkweed, Hieracium glomeratum (Lactuceae, Asteraceae), in the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Botany 84: 133-142.
40. _, J. P. MCCAFFREY, P. C. QUIMBY, and J. L. BIRDSALL. 1997. Hawkweeds in the northwestern United States. Rangelands 19: 18-23.
41. ZAHN, K. 1921-1923. Compositae-Hieracium. Pp. 1147-1705 in Das Pflanzenreich Heft 82, ed. A. Engler, Leipzig.