Visually induced motion sickness with radial displays: Effects of gaze angle and fixation

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 78, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 659-665

  Diels, Cyriel ^a   Ukai, Kazuhiko ^b   Howarth, Peter A ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gaze position; Motion sickness; Radial optic flow; Vection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; MOTION SICKNESS; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOGRAPHY; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 34447288057     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bagshaw M, Stott JRR. The desensitisation of chronically motion sick aircrew in the Royal Air Force. Aviat Space Environ Med 1985; 56:1144-51.
2. Brandt T, Dichgans J, Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Exp Brain Res 1973; 16:476-91.
3. Brandt T, Dichgans J, Wist ER. Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Percept Psychophys 1975; 17:497-503.
4. Crowley JS. Simulator sickness: a problem for Army aviation. Aviat Space Environ Med 1987; 58:355-7.
5. Dichgans J, Brandt T. Visual-vestibular interaction: effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R, Leibowitz HW, Teuber HL, eds. Handbook of sensory physiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1978:755-804.
6. Diels C, Howarth PA. Frequency dependence of visually-induced motion sickness in the fore-and-aft direction. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006; 77:346.
7. Diels C, Howarth PA. Visually-induced motion sickness caused by large field optokinetic stimuli. In: Proceedings of the 40th United Kingdom Group Meeting on Human Responses to Vibration; 2005; Liverpool, England. London, UK: Health & Safety Executive; 2005:1-9.
8. Flanagan MB, May JG, Dobie TG. Optokinetic nystagmus, vection, and motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 2002; 73:1067-73.
9. Hettinger LJ. Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In: Stanney KM, ed. Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002:471-91.
10. Howard IP, Heckmann T. Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays. Perception 1989; 18:657-65.
11. Howard IP, Howard A. Vection: the contributions of absolute and relative visual motion. Perception 1994; 23:745-51.
12. Howard IP, Ohmi M. The efficiency of the central and peripheral retina in driving human optokinetic nystagmus. Vision Res 1984; 24:969-76.
13. Hu S, Stern RM, Vasey MS, Koch KL. Motion sickness and gastro myolectric activity as a function of speed of rotation of a circular vection drum. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 60: 411-4.
14. Kennedy RS, Lane N, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1993; 3:203-20.
15. Klosterhalfen S, Kellermann S, Pan F, Stockhorst U, et al. Effects of ethnicity and gender on motion sickness susceptibility. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76:1051-7.
16. Lawson B, Graeber D, Mead A, Muth E. Signs and symptoms of human syndromes associated with synthetic experiences. In: Stanney KM, ed. Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002:589-618.
17. Lestienne F, Soechting JF, Berthoz A. Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp Brain Res 1977; 28:363-84.
18. Lin JJ-W, Parker DE, Lahav M, Furness TA. Unobtrusive vehicle motion prediction cues reduced simulator sickness during passive travel in a driving simulator. Ergonomics 2005; 48:608-24.
19. Mach E. Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen [Fundamentals of the theory of movement perception]. Leipzig: Engelmann; 1875.
20. Mergner T, Wertheim AH, Rumberger A. Which retinal and extra-retinal information is crucial for circular vection? Arch Ital Biol 2000; 138:123-38.
21. Oman CM. Sensory conflict in motion sickness: an observer theory approach. In: Ellis S, Kaiser M, Grunwals A, eds. Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments. London: Taylor & Francis; 1991:363-76.
22. Reason JT, Brand JJ. Motion sickness. London, UK: Academic Press; 1975.
23. Rolnick A, Lubow RE. Why is the driver rarely sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics 1991; 34: 867-79.
24. So RH, Lo WT, Ho AT. Effects of navigation speed on motion sickness caused by an immersive virtual environment. Hum Factors 2001; 43:452-61.
25. Sparto PJ, Whitney SL, Hodges LF, Furman JM, et al. Simulator sickness when performing gaze shifts within a wide field of view optic flow environment: preliminary evidence for using virtual reality in vestibular rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2004; 1:14.
26. Stanney KM, Hash P. Locus of user-initiated control in virtual environments: influences on cybersickness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1998; 7:447-59.
27. Stern RM, Hu S, Anderson RB, Leibowitz HW, et al. The effects of fixation and restricted visual field on vection-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 1990; 61:712-5.
28. Telford L, Frost BJ. Factors affecting the onset and magnitude of linear vection. Percept Psychophys 1993; 53:682-92.
29. Turner M, Kendrick SC. Perceptual style, volitional eye movements, and their relation to visually induced motion sickness. In: Proceedings of 38th UK conference on Human Response to Vibration; 17-19 September 2003; Gosport, UK: Institute of Naval Medicine. Alverstoke, Gosport, UK: Institute of Naval Medicine; 2003:107-18.
30. Warren WH, Kurtz KJ. The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Percept Psychophys 1992; 51:443-54.
31. Webb NA, Griffin MJ. Eye movement, vection, and motion sickness with foveal and peripheral vision. Aviat Space Environ Med 2003; 74:622-5.