Simulator sickness when performing gaze shifts within a wide field of view optic flow environment: Preliminary evidence for using virtual reality in vestibular rehabilitation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Sparto, Patrick J ^a,b,c   Whitney, Susan L ^a,b   Hodges, Larry F ^d   Furman, Joseph M ^a,b,c   Redfern, Mark S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^d University of North Carolina at Charlotte   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLIGHT; FLOW; GAZE; HEAD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INCIDENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICS; RECORDING; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SIMULATOR; SIMULATOR SICKNESS; SYMPTOM; TASK PERFORMANCE; VESTIBULAR SYSTEM; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 15244351517     PISSN: 17430003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-1-14     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Grimby A, Rosenhall U: Health-related quality of life and dizziness in old age.[see comment]. Gerontology 1995, 41(5):286-298.
2. Yardley L, Owen N, Nazareth I, Luxon L: Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working age people.[see comment]. Br J Gen Pract 1998, 48(429):1131-1135.
3. Whitney SL, Hudak MT, Marchetti GF: The dynamic gait index relates to self-reported fall history in individuals with vestibular dysfunction. J Vestib Res 2000, 10:99-105.
4. Tinetti ME, Williams CS: The effect of falls and fall injuries on functioning in community-dwelling older persons. Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences 1998, 53(2):M112-119.
5. Sveistrup H, McComas J, Thornton M, Marshall S, Finestone H, McCormick A, Babulic K, Mayhew A: Experimental studies of virtual reality-delivered compared to conventional exercise programs for rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003, 6(3):245-249.
6. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H: Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther 2002, 82(9):898-915.
7. Girone M, Burdea G, Bouzit M, Popescu V, Deutsch JE: Orthopedic rehabilitation using the "Rutgers ankle" interface. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics 2000, 70:89-95.
8. Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF, Kooper R, Opdyke D, Williford JS, North M: Effectiveness of computer-generated (virtual reality) graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia. Am J Psychiatry 1995, 152(4):626-628.
9. Viirre E: Vestibular telemedicine and rehabilitation. Applications for virtual reality. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics 1996, 29:299-305.
10. Viirre E, Draper M, Gailey C, Miller D, Furness T: Adaptation of the VOR in patients with low VOR gains. J Vestib Res 1998, 8(4):331-334.
11. Kramer PD, Roberts DC, Shelhamer M, Zee DS: A versatile stereoscopic visual display system for vestibular and oculomotor research. J Vestib Res 1998, 8(5):363-379.
12. Herdman SJ, Whitney SL: Treatment of vestibular hypofunction. In In: Vestibular Rehabilitation 2nd edition. Edited by: Herdman SJ. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 1999:387-423.
13. Fetter M, Zee DS: Recovery from unilateral labyrinthectomy in rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 1988, 59(2):370-393.
14. Miles FA, Eighmy BB: Long-term adaptive changes in primate vestibuloocular reflex. I. Behavioral observations. J Neurophysiol 1980, 43(5):1406-1425.
15. Pavlou M, Lingeswaran A, Davies RA, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM: Machine-based vs. customized rehabilitation for the treatment of chronic vestibular disorders. In ISPG Symposium Maastrict, The Netherlands 2001.
16. Shepard NT, Telian SA, Smith-Wheelock M: Habituation and balance retraining therapy. A retrospective review. Neurol Clin 1990, 8(2):459-475.
17. Jacob RG, Woody SR, Clark DB, Lilienfeld SO: Discomfort with space and motion: A possible marker of vestibular dysfunction assessed by the situational characteristics questionnaire. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment 1993, 15:299-324.
18. Bronstein AM: The visual vertigo syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995:45-48.
19. Emmelkamp PM, Krijn M, Hulsbosch AM, de Vries S, Schuemie MJ, van der Mast CA: Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behav Res Ther 2002, 40(5):509-516.
20. Cruz Neira C, Sandin Daniel J, DeFanti Thomas A: Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. Proc-ACM-SIGGRAPH-93-Conf-Comput-Graphics Publ by ACM, New York, NY, USA 1993:135-142.
21. Hettinger Lawrence J, Riccio Gary E: Visually induced motion sickness in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1992, 1(3):306-310.
22. Pausch R, Crea T, Conway M: A literature survey for virtual environments: military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1992, 1(3):344-363.
23. Jacobson J, Redfern MS, Furman JF, Whitney SL, Sparto PJ, Wilson JB, Hodges LF: Balance NAVE: a virtual reality facility for research and rehabilitation of balance disorders. In In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology: 2001; Banff, Alberta, Canada ACM Press; 2001:103-109.
24. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal ML: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1993, 3:203-220.
25. Baltzley DR, Kennedy RS, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG, Gower DW: The time course of postflight simulator sickness symptoms. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989, 60(11):1043-1048.
26. Cobb SVG, Nichols S, Ramsey A, Wilson JR: Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1999, 8(2):169-186.
27. Regan EC, Price KR: The frequency of occurrence and severity of side effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviat Space Environ Med 1994, 65:527-530.
28. Kennedy RS, Stanney KM, Dunlap WP: Duration and exposure to virtual environments: sickness curves during and across sessions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2000, 9(5):463-472.
29. Stanney KM, Kennedy RS, Drexler JM, Harm DL: Motion sickness and proprioceptive aftereffects following virtual environment exposure. Appl Ergon 1999, 30(1):27-38.
30. Mon-Williams M, Wann JP, Rushton S: Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics 1993, 13(4):387-391.
31. Rushton SK, Riddell PM: Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence. Appl Ergon 1999, 30(1):69-78.
32. DiZio P, Lackner JR: Spatial orientation, adaptation, and motion sickness in real and virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1992, 1(3):319-328.
33. Howarth PA, Finch M: The nauseogenicity of two methods of navigating within a virtual environment. Appl Ergon 1999, 30(1):39-45.