|
Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 97-102
|
A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: What is the added value of the second generation?
|
Author keywords
Classification and labeling; Developmental toxicity; Fertility; NOAEL; One generation study; Reproductive toxicity; Risk assessment; Two generation study
|
Indexed keywords
TOXIC SUBSTANCE;
ARTICLE;
DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER;
INFERTILITY;
NONHUMAN;
ONE GENERATION STUDY;
PROGENY;
REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TOXICITY TESTING;
TWO GENERATION STUDY;
ANIMALS;
BODY WEIGHT;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG;
EMBRYO IMPLANTATION;
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS;
EPIDIDYMIS;
FEMALE;
FERTILITY;
GERM CELLS;
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT;
LITTER SIZE;
MALE;
NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL;
PESTICIDES;
POPULATION DYNAMICS;
REPRODUCTION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SPERMATOZOA;
TIME FACTORS;
TOXICITY TESTS, CHRONIC;
ANIMALIA;
|
EID: 34447265983
PISSN: 08906238
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.04.068 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (56)
|
References (4)
|