Myocardial perfusion spect imaging: Current concepts;Übersichtsarbeit: Aktuelle konzepte der myokardperfusionsszintigraphie

Deutsches Arzteblatt

Volumn 104, Issue 14, 2007, Pages

  Lindner, Oliver ^a   Rusche, Herbert ^b   Schäfers, Michael ^c   Schober, Otmar ^c   Burchert, Wolfgang ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b ST JOSEF HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiological diagnosis; Coronary artery disease; Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; Revascularization; SPECT

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 34447260771     PISSN: 00121207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Bundesärztekammer, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung: Nationale Versorgungs-Leitlinie Chronische KHK (Kurzfassung). Mai 2006; Version 1.1., www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/thertien/khk/pdf/nvl_khk_kurz.pdf
2. Bundesärztekammer, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung: Nationale Versorgungs-Leitlinie Chronische KHK (Langfassung). 11. Februar 2006. www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/ themen/khk/pdf/nvl_khk-lang.pdf
3. Bruckenberger E: Herzbericht 2004 mit Transplantationschirurgie; 2005. Selbstverlag, Hannover, Hitzackerweg 1a.
4. Heller GV: Tracer selection with different stress modalities based on tracer kinetics. J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 3: S15-21.
5. Kapur A, Latus KA, Davies G, et al.: A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29: 1608-16.
6. ICRP Publication 62: Radiological protection in biomedical research. Annals of the ICRP Vol. 22/4, Pergamon Press; 1993.
7. ICRP Publication 80: Radiological protection in biomedical research. Annals of the ICRP Vol 28/3, Pergamon Press; 1998.
8. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz: Röntgendiagnostik - schädlich oder nützlich? 2006. www.bfs.de/www/extfs/bfs/druck/ strahlenthemen/STTH_Roentgen.pdf
9. Cerqueira MD: Pharmacologic stress versus maximal-exercise stress for perfusion imaging: which, when, and why? J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 3: S10-4.
10. Paul AK, Hasegawa S, Yoshioka J et al.: Exercise-induced stunning continues for at least one hour: evaluation with quantitative gated single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 410-5.
11. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE: Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004; 11: 171-85.
12. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH et al.: ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging - executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2003; American College of Cardiology Web site. www.acc.org/clinical/ guidelines/radio/index.pdf
13. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K et al.: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina - summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). 2003; American College of Cardiology. www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/stable/stable_clean.pdf.
14. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ et al.: Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 535-43.
15. Abdel Fattah A, Kamal AM, Pancholy S et al.: Prognostic implications of normal exercise tomographic thallium images in patients with angiographic evidence of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 769-71.
16. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB et al.: Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1999; 100: 1035-42.
17. Sharir T, Germano G, Kang X et al.: Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 831-7.
18. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V: Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995; 92: 657-71.
19. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E et al.: From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003; 108: 1664-72.
20. Hasdai D, Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR Jr., Higano ST, Lerman A: Coronary endothelial dysfunction in humans is associated with myocardial perfusion defects. Circulation 1997; 96: 3390-5.
21. Zeiher AM, Krause T, Schachinger V, Minners J, Moser E: Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of coronary resistance vessels is associated with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1995; 91: 2345-52.
22. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217-25.
23. Pompa JJ, Kuntz RE, Baim DS: Percutaneous coronary and valvular intervention. In: Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Braunwald E, eds. Braunwald's Heart Disease. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005: 1367-98.
24. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS: The use of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 2005; 35: 62-72.
25. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS: Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003; 107: 2900-7.