Differences in cardiovascular sensitivity to propofol in a chromosome substitution rat model

Croatian Medical Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 312-318

  Stekiel, Thomas A ^a,b   Weber, Craig A ^a   Contney, Stephen J ^a   Bošnjak, Željko J ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b CLEMENT J ZABLOCKI VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME SUBSTITUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSE INCREASE; DRUG SENSITIVITY; INBRED STRAIN; INFUSION RATE; INTROGRESSION; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; RAT; SHOCK;

ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, CONGENIC; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; PHARMACOGENETICS; PROPOFOL; RATS; RATS, INBRED BN; RATS, INBRED DAHL; SHOCK;

EID: 34447130273     PISSN: 03539504     EISSN: 13328166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kayser B, Rajaram S, Thomas S, Morgan PG, Sedensky MM. Control of anesthetic response in C. elegans. Toxicol Lett. 1998;100-101:339-46.
2. Stekiel TA, Contney SJ, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP, Roman RJ, Stekiel WJ. Chromosomal substitution-dependent differences in cardiovascular responses to sodium pentobarbital. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:799-805.
3. Stekiel TA. J Contney S, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP, Roman RJ, Stekiel WJ. Reversal of minimum alveolar concentrations of volatile anesthetics by chromosomal substitution. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:796-8.
4. Cowley AW Jr, Liang M, Roman RJ, Greene AS, Jacob HJ. Consomic rat model systems for physiological genomics. Acta Physiol Scand. 2004;181:585-92.
5. Schwinn DA, Booth JV. Genetics infuses new life into human physiology: implications of the human genome project for anesthesiology and perioperative medicine. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:261-3.
6. Stekiel TA, Contney SJ, Kokita N, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP, Stekiel WJ. Mechanisms of isoflurane-mediated hyperpolarization of vascular smooth muscle in chronically hypertensive and normotensive conditions. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:496-506.
7. Gamo S, Dodo K, Matakatsu H, Tanaka Y. Molecular genetical analysis of Drosophila ether sensitive mutants. Toxicol Lett. 1998;100-101:329-37.
8. Sonner JM, Gong D, Eger EI II. Naturally occurring variability in anesthetic potency among inbred mouse strains. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:720-6.
9. Simpson VJ, Rikke BA, Costello JM, Corley R, Johnson TE. Identification of a genetic region in mice that specifies sensitivity to propofol. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:379-89.
10. Lasocki S, Iglarz M, Seince PF, Vuillaumier-Barrot S, Vicaut E, Henrion D, et al. Involvement of renin-angiotensin system in pressure-flow relationship: role of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:271-5.
11. Homanics GE, Xu Y, Tang P. Integrated approaches to the action of general anesthetics and alcohol. Physiol Behav. 2002;77:495-9.
12. Gamo S. Studies on target genes of general anesthetics. Curr Drug Targets. 2002;3:31-41.
13. Nadeau JH, Singer JB, Matin A, Lander ES. Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet. 2000;24:221-5.
14. Iwai J, Knudsen KD, Dahl LK, Tassinari L. Effects of adrenalectomy on blood pressure in salt-fed, hypertension-prone rats. Failure of hypertension to develop in absence of evidence of adrenal cortical tissue. J Exp Med. 1969;129:663-78.
15. Pennisi E. Genomics. Rat genome off to an early start. Science. 2000;289:1267-9.