Sensitivity of angler benefit estimates from a model of recreational demand to the definition of the substitute sites considered by the angler

Fishery Bulletin

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 161-167

  Gentner, Brad ^a  

^a NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACACIA RETUSA; MORONE;

EID: 34447128919     PISSN: 00900656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bockstael, N. E., K. E. McConnell, and I. E. Strand. 1991. Recreation. In Measuring the demand for environmental quality (J. Braden, and C. Kolstad, eds.), 227-268 p. North-Holland Publs., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2. Gentner, B. J., S. Steinback, and M. Price. 2001. Marine angler expenditures in the Pacific coast region, 2000. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-49, 66 p.
3. Haab, T., and R. Hicks. 1997. Accounting for choice set endogeneity in random utility models of site choice. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 34:127-47.
4. Haab, T., and R. Hicks. 1999. Choice set considerations in models of recreation demand. Mar. Res. Econ. 14:271-281.
5. Hicks, R., A. B. Gautam, D. VanVoorhees, M. Osborn, and B. Gentner. 1999. Thalassorama: an introduction to the NMFS marine recreational fisheries statistical survey with an emphasis on economic valuation. Mar. Res. Econ. 14:375-385.
6. Hicks, R., and I. E. Strand. 2000. The extent of information: Its relevance for random utility models. Land Econ. 76:374-385.
7. Jones, C. A., and F. Lupi. 1999. The effects of modeling substitute activities on recreational benefit estimates. Mar. Res. Econ. 14:357-374.
8. Krinsky, I., and A. L. Robb. 1986. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev. Econ. Stats. 68:715-719
9. Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, 401 p. Economic Soc. Monographs. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY.
10. Parsons, G. R., D. M. Massey, and T. Tomasi. 1999. Familiar and favorite sites in a random utility model of beach recreation. Mar. Res. Econ. 14:299-315.
11. Parsons, G. R., and A. B. Hauber. 1998. Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand. Land Econ. 74:32-48.
12. Steinback, S., B. Gentner, and J. Castle. 2004. Economic impacts of marine recreational angling in the United States. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Prof. Pap. NMFS 2, 169 p.
13. Whitehead, J. C., and T. C. Haab. 1999. Distance and catch based choice sets. Mar. Res. Econ. 14:283-299.