Midterm follow-up of patients receiving radial artery as coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector-row CT coronary angiography;Coronaro-TC con apparecchiatura multidetettore a 16 canali nel follow-up a medio termine dei pazienti riceventi l'arteria radiale come bypass aorto-coronarico

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 538-549

  Crusco, F ^a,e   Antoniella, A ^b   Papa, V ^b   Menzano, R ^b   Di Lazzaro, D ^c   Di Manici, G ^c   Ragni, T ^c   Giovagnoni, A ^d  

^a Ospedale di Foligno   (Italy)

^b Ospedale Assisi   (Italy)

^c SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^e NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass graft; Multidetector CT; Radial artery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT OCCLUSION; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RADIAL ARTERY; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNAL MAMMARY-CORONARY ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34447121895     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0160-6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. FitzGibbon GM, Cafka HP, Leach AJ et al (1996) Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1388 patients over 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:616-626
2. Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E et al (2001) Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88:792-795
3. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ et al (2003) Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 229:749-756
4. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P et al (2004) Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1224-1229
5. Dewey M, Lembcke A, Enzweiler C et al (2004) Isotropic half-millimeter angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts with 16-slice computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 77:800-804
6. Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK (2005) MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: how we do it-data acquisition, postprocessing, display, and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1402-1412
7. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK (2004) CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 232:18-37
8. Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C et al (2005) Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 95:1094-1097
9. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A et al (2004) Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 110:3234-3238
10. Frazier AA, Qureshi F, Read KM et al (2005) Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment with multidetector CT in the early and late postoperative settings. Radiographics 25:881-896
11. Loop F, Lytle B, Cosgrove DM et al (1986) Influence of the inter-nalmammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 314:1-6
12. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV (1996) Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts: effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 334:216-219
13. Caputo M, Reeves B, Marchetto G et al (2003) Radial versus right internal thoracic artery as a second arterial conduit for coronary surgery: early and midterm outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:39-47
14. Khot UN, Friedman DT, Pettersson G et al (2004) Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. Circulation 109:2086-2091
15. Khot UN, Friedman DT, Ellis SG (2005) Radial-artery coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 352:941-942
16. Zacharias A, Habib RH, Schwann TA et al (2005) Radial artery conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: current perspective. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:232-233
17. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA (2004) Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 77:93-101
18. Gaudino M, Nasso G, Canosa C et al (2005) Midterm angiographic patency and vasoreactive profile of proximal versus distal radial artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 79:1987-1989
19. Palmas W, Bingham S, Diamond GA et al (1995) Incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium-201 myocardial single photon emission computed tomography late after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:403-409
20. Zellweger M, Lewin HC, Lai S et al (2001) When to stress patients after coronary artery bypass surgery? Risk stratification in patients early and late post-CABG using stress myocardial perfusion SPECT: Implications of appropriate clinical strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:144-152
21. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE (2004) Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 351:2302-2309
22. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on coronary angiography). Circulation 99:2345-2357
23. Khan MF, Herzog C, Landenberger K et al (2005) Visualisation of non-invasive coronary bypass imaging: 4-row vs. 16-row multidetector computed tomography. Eur Radiol 15:118-126
24. Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N, Bonomo L (2004) Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 14:1353-1362
25. Gasparovic H, Rybicki FJ, Millstine J et al (2005) Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28:244-249
26. Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Kobza R et al (2004) Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography-influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility. Radiology 232:568-577
27. Zeff RH, Kkongtahworn C, Iannone LA et al (1988) Internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending artery: prospective randomized study with 10-year followup. Ann Thorac Surg 45:533-536
28. Grondin C, Campeau L, Lesperance J et al (1984) Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of of patients 10 years after operation. Circulation 70:1208-1212
29. Royse AG, Royse CF, Shah P et al (1999) Radial artery harvest technique, use and functional outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:186-193
30. Calafiore A, Teodori G, Di Gianmarco G et al (1995) Coronary revascularization with the radial artery: new interest for an old conduit. J Card Surg 10:140-146
31. Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M et al (1991) Comparative anatomy and histology of the radial artery and the internal thoracic artery. Implication for coronary artery bypass. Surg Radiol Anat 13:283-288
32. Maniar HS, Sundt TM, Barner HB et al (2002) Effect of target stenosis and location on radial artery graft patency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:45-52
33. Desai ND, Fremes SE (2005) Radial artery coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 352:941-942
34. Royse AG, Royse CF, Tatoulis J et al (2000) Postoperative radial artery angiography for coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:294-304